DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 122139--------------------------------------------------
Dagenham Code 62 PCN / Lawrence Cres
DIR By: tekko10
Date: June 17, 2026, 2:40 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hey,
Ive moved to Dagenham a few months ago and have always parked in
the same area. I parked like all the other cars half on the
pavement. I hadnt checked up on my car for couple of days and
when i checked today I had 2 PCN's with the Code 62. My question
is if this is fair as I was the only one who received PCN's. Ive
checked with the owners of the other cars which are seen in the
councils evidence and they have not received any PCN's. Do I
have a chance to appeal this ?
Google Drive (Pictures):
HTML https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1rJD_-7DcUjWihe_H1pmYUdaxbB6RgYKi?usp=sharing
Location:
HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/brW535r6aafBLGKGA
Thanks
#Post#: 122140--------------------------------------------------
Re: Dagenham Code 62 PCN / Lawrence Cres
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: June 17, 2026, 2:45 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Pleas also post the PCN. Do not redact anything if this is a
kerbside PCN. Redact only name and address on postal PCNs and on
other postal enforcement documents.
Sorry, found it !
#Post#: 122142--------------------------------------------------
Re: Dagenham Code 62 PCN / Lawrence Cres
DIR By: tekko10
Date: June 17, 2026, 2:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Added the PCN's on the google drive
#Post#: 122143--------------------------------------------------
Re: Dagenham Code 62 PCN / Lawrence Cres
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: June 17, 2026, 2:58 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Dagenham are absolutely shite at this sort of thing because GSV
shows cars parked part-off-carriageway in virtually all these
type of streets; i.e. they have form !!
Unfortunately, the latest view of this street is 2020, and much
can change in that time. There should be signs on both sides of
the street to indicate whether off-carriageway parking is
permitted and from where to where on the street. Are there such
signs ? With GSV out-of-date, it is now your task to tell us if
there are any signs indicating off-carriageway parking. I had a
quick look at other streets in this estate and there are NO such
signs in 2020, yet cars parked part off-carriageway indicating
it was tolerated then.
#Post#: 122144--------------------------------------------------
Re: Dagenham Code 62 PCN / Lawrence Cres
DIR By: tekko10
Date: June 17, 2026, 3:08 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hey,
I have now added up to date pictures on the Google Drive inc the
CPZ Map of Dagenham. There are no signs stating anything other
than the Lorry sign.
#Post#: 122146--------------------------------------------------
Re: Dagenham Code 62 PCN / Lawrence Cres
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: June 17, 2026, 3:13 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
As I suspected, they "tolerate" off-carriageway parking and
leave it up to CEOs to decide whether to serve a PCN or not
depending on the car's position. I suggest you talk to a few
neighbours to find out what is going on, and also contact the
local councillors to ask the same question.
#Post#: 122150--------------------------------------------------
Re: Dagenham Code 62 PCN / Lawrence Cres
DIR By: tincombe
Date: June 17, 2026, 4:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
IMO, an adjudicator would disregard your claims regarding
whether other cars park as you but without being penalised.
But what they can consider IMO is 'Ive moved to Dagenham a few
months ago and have always parked in the same area'. This is
your experience which could inform a defence of 'legitimate
expectation'. But you'll need to put meat into this claim.
#Post#: 122158--------------------------------------------------
Re: Dagenham Code 62 PCN / Lawrence Cres
DIR By: stamfordman
Date: June 17, 2026, 6:06 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
As the car hadn't moved the second PCN falls as it is a
continuous contravention.
There are other possible issues. Before I look at the traffic
order map post the reverse of the PCNs.
#Post#: 122165--------------------------------------------------
Re: Dagenham Code 62 PCN / Lawrence Cres
DIR By: tekko10
Date: June 18, 2026, 1:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I have uploaded the Reverses on google drive aswell as a video I
had with the CEO who issued the Tickets
I have also sent an email to my local councillor about this now.
#Post#: 122174--------------------------------------------------
Re: Dagenham Code 62 PCN / Lawrence Cres
DIR By: tincombe
Date: June 18, 2026, 3:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I have also sent an email to my local councillor about this now.
They might interest themselves in the wider issue of footway
parking in that area, but they cannot interfere in your case:
you must make representations on your own behalf.
In short I can see:
You were parked in contravention of the London-wide 1974
prohibition of footway parking in a road subject to this
restriction;
According to the OP, the car was stationary between 16th and
17th June
PCNs were issued by the same CEO at on 8.09 on 16 June and on
7.43 on 17 June, a gap of less than 24 hours;
Both PCNs are visible on 17th(which supports the contention that
the car did not move between PCNs);
The second PCN has something attached between the envelope and
the screen(OP, what was this?);
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 2
DIR Next Page