DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 121955--------------------------------------------------
UKPC NTK disabled parking bay
DIR By: Mocede28
Date: June 16, 2026, 7:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hello all
I have received ntk today few minutes ago in the post for driver
parking in a disabled bay on the 30/05/26. There is clear
signage for the blue badge holder bays.
I’m not sure as the keeper if I can appeal based on this ntk
being non pofa compliant?
HTML https://ibb.co/238s2wGq
HTML https://ibb.co/hRrVhwYz
Any help or advice appreciated, thanks.
#Post#: 121957--------------------------------------------------
Re: UKPC NTK disabled parking bay
DIR By: jfollows
Date: June 16, 2026, 7:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
There is no “period of parking” for starters.
--- Quote ---
> 9(1)A notice which is to be relied on as a notice to keeper
for the purposes of paragraph 6(1)(b) is given in accordance
with this paragraph if the following requirements are met.
>
> (2)The notice must—
>
> (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was
parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 121962--------------------------------------------------
Re: UKPC NTK disabled parking bay
DIR By: InterCity125
Date: June 16, 2026, 8:32 am
---------------------------------------------------------
It also fails PoFA Schedule 4 Paragraph 9(2)(b) as the notice
fails to specify that the parking charges have not be paid in
full which is the second part of the sentence set out in the
legislation.
#Post#: 121964--------------------------------------------------
Re: UKPC NTK disabled parking bay
DIR By: Mocede28
Date: June 16, 2026, 8:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Oh that’s good to hear, there are multiple failures of
compliance.
Would anyone be kind enough to draft an appeal which I can copy
into my appeal? Please.
#Post#: 121991--------------------------------------------------
Re: UKPC NTK disabled parking bay
DIR By: Mocede28
Date: June 16, 2026, 11:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Is this any good ?
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am appealing this Parking Charge Notice as the registered
keeper.
The Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the requirements of
Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 and therefore
keeper liability cannot be established.
Firstly, the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with Paragraph
9(2)(a) of Schedule 4. The notice specifies only a single
timestamp (“30/05/2026 at 15:42:45”) and does not specify the
required “period of parking” to which the notice relates.
Secondly, the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with Paragraph
9(2)(b) of Schedule 4 as it does not contain the wording
required by the legislation regarding the parking charges
remaining unpaid by the driver.
As the Notice to Keeper does not comply with the mandatory
requirements of Schedule 4, you cannot transfer liability from
the driver to the keeper.
There is no legal obligation upon me to identify the driver, and
I will not be doing so.
In the circumstances, please confirm that the Parking Charge
Notice has been cancelled. Should you reject this appeal, please
provide a POPLA verification code so that the matter may be
referred to independent adjudication.
I look forward to your confirmation that this Parking Charge
Notice has been cancelled.
Yours faithfully,
Registered Keeper
#Post#: 121993--------------------------------------------------
Re: UKPC NTK disabled parking bay
DIR By: jfollows
Date: June 16, 2026, 11:24 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Looks OK to me - they’ll reject it, POPLA probably will, but
you’ve got the basis of a defence for a court claim already and
UKPC seem to use DCB Legal who usually discontinue rather than
pay the court fee.
#Post#: 122038--------------------------------------------------
Re: UKPC NTK disabled parking bay
DIR By: Mocede28
Date: June 16, 2026, 5:38 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I’ve had some horizon ones in the past and appealed along the
non pofa compliance route and managed to get them dismissed also
helped a friend with one being successful too.
I was wondering why you’re saying it will be rejected but after
having a good snoop on here regarding UKPC it seems they truly
are heartless, not even the slightest of discretions. I have no
hope in POPLA but I do wonder how they have become a body who
see to appeals.
Sorry intercity125 I sent you PM before due research I have my
answer after snooping.
#Post#: 122048--------------------------------------------------
Re: UKPC NTK disabled parking bay
DIR By: jfollows
Date: June 17, 2026, 1:14 am
---------------------------------------------------------
On receipt of an appeal, parking companies have two choices:
- Accept the appeal. They get no money
- Reject the appeal. They may still get money
So which do you think most of them do? Lots of people don’t
appeal, but many who do just pay up when their appeal is
rejected. These companies only care about getting your money.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1