DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 121699--------------------------------------------------
epping forest pcn
DIR By: Ray236
Date: June 13, 2026, 9:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://imgpile.com/p/JT1S87I#GGruLmq
Hi everyone,
I've just received my first Parking Charge Notice from Horizon
Parking and I'm looking for some advice on whether I have
grounds to appeal.
My daughter is a Blue Badge holder, and the Blue Badge was
displayed in the vehicle at the time. We genuinely believed that
she was entitled to park there without payment because of her
disability and the badge being displayed. We've now received a
parking charge for allegedly failing to pay for parking.
Is there any way to appeal this successfully based on the fact
that a valid Blue Badge was displayed and that the vehicle was
being used by a disabled person? Has anyone had experience with
Horizon Parking or a similar situation?
Any advice on the best way to approach the appeal would be
greatly appreciated. If possible, I'd be grateful for any
responses as soon as possible, as I don't want to miss any
appeal deadlines.
Many thanks in advance.
#Post#: 121704--------------------------------------------------
Re: epping forest pcn
DIR By: jfollows
Date: June 13, 2026, 10:28 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The terms and conditions for parking should be clearly displayed
on signs at the location.
When parking on private land, there is no requirement to provide
free parking for blue badge holders, although of course they can
offer this if they want to.
Assuming that a blue badge entitles the holder to park for free
on private land is a mistake.
Whatever you or your daughter believed, the important terms
should be displayed on the signs and the driver enters into a
contract by reading them and by parking. If the signs are
unclear, there may be an argument in their favour.
If you want more specific advice, please read
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/read-this-first-private-parking-charges-forum-guide/<br
/>and post the information it requests (and I note you have
posted
the PCN, but what about the signs?). But just assuming a blue
badge means free parking anywhere may be a mistake.
HTML https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-blue-badge-scheme-rights-and-responsibilities-in-england/the-blue-badge-scheme-rights-and-responsibilities-in-england
--- Quote ---
> The badge is intended for on-street parking only.
>
> Off-street car parks, such as those provided by shopping
centres, hospitals or supermarkets are covered by separate
rules.
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 121728--------------------------------------------------
Re: epping forest pcn
DIR By: InterCity125
Date: June 14, 2026, 2:22 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Epping Forest is subject to Byelaws making it land subject to
statutory control.
HTML https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/assets/Green-Spaces/epping-forest-act-1878.pdf
This means that it is unlikely that the parking operator can
rely on PoFA.
Furthermore, the NtK is not PoFA compliant.
You could send the following reply sent as an appeal make by the
KEEPER.
Never reveal the driver.
PCN Number -
Registration Mark -
To whom it may concern,
I am the Registered Keeper of the above vehicle.
I write in relation to the above parking charge.
The vehicle driver is not known to you and there is no
obligation in law for me to reveal the driver details and I will
not be doing so.
Your PCN is clearly not relying on PoFA in order to invoke
'keeper liability'.
Your choices are therefore;
1. Cancel this PCN
OR
2. Waste more time, money and resources by rejecting my appeal
and supplying me with a POPLA code.
I am sorry that I cannot help you further.
Best wishes,
xxxxx xxxxxxxx
#Post#: 121744--------------------------------------------------
Re: epping forest pcn
DIR By: DWMB2
Date: June 14, 2026, 10:06 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Please show us the back of the PCN.
[member=6750]InterCity125[/member] sometimes Horizon PCNs that
seem otherwise non-compliant seem to cover quite a lot of the
requirements on the back (although not often).
--- Quote ---
> Epping Forest is subject to Byelaws making it land subject to
statutory control.
--- End Quote ---
Usual caveat here that being subject to statutory control does
not on its own render land 'non-relevant', the parking of
vehicles on the said land must be subject to statutory control.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1