URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 121143--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden, Maple Street - Failing to Comply with a one-way
       restriction
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: June 8, 2026, 10:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The contravention is 7 March 2026, the PCN is 3 June 2026. Is it
       a lease car?
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/NdDZy61h/cam-ezgif-com-video-to-gif-converter.gif
       #Post#: 121155--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden, Maple Street - Failing to Comply with a one-way
       restriction
   DIR By: Europlus
       Date: June 8, 2026, 11:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It is a lease car, but the lease company have passed on my
       details and the PCN has come to me
       #Post#: 121168--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden, Maple Street - Failing to Comply with a one-way
       restriction
   DIR By: Europlus
       Date: June 8, 2026, 11:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Europlus link ---
       >
       > It is a lease car, but the lease company have passed on my
       details and the PCN has come to me
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Ah, I think I get your point now. Are you questioning the time
       taken to send me the PCN? That hadn't occurred to me, but as it
       is a lease car, I expect there are grounds to send the PCN
       later?
       #Post#: 121174--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden, Maple Street - Failing to Comply with a one-way
       restriction
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: June 8, 2026, 12:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Europlus link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Europlus link=topic=11089.msg121155#msg121155
       date=1780934539]
       > It is a lease car, but the lease company have passed on my
       details and the PCN has come to me
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Ah, I think I get your point now. Are you questioning the time
       taken to send me the PCN? That hadn't occurred to me, but as it
       is a lease car, I expect there are grounds to send the PCN
       later?
       [/quote]
       The lease company have 28 days to respond to the PCN, then, when
       the council accept their reps cancel the PCN, which will take
       some days, they then have 28 days to serve a second PCN.
       #Post#: 121177--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden, Maple Street - Failing to Comply with a one-way
       restriction
   DIR By: Europlus
       Date: June 8, 2026, 12:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The lease company have 28 days to respond to the PCN, then, when
       the council accept their reps cancel the PCN, which will take
       some days, they then have 28 days to serve a second PCN.
       [/quote]
       So, The Lease company would have had until 4 April to respond,
       and assuming, generously that the council needed the 28 days to
       turn around a new PCN, they would have had to start the new PCN
       on the 6 May, so would it be fair to assume 32 days of the info
       sitting around in the council offices is reasonable?
       If we assume 7 days is reasonable, the council should have
       reissued a new PCN to me on the 9 May (or 11th as it was a
       Saturday) and not almost a month later (88 days after the event)
       #Post#: 121211--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden, Maple Street - Failing to Comply with a one-way
       restriction
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: June 8, 2026, 4:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I gave you the arithmetic, but forgot to mention that the
       council's second 28 days is from the date of cancellation of the
       first PCN. So I think you do have a second string to your
       representations bow of "PCN served out of time". The council
       will then have to explain their tardiness in serving the second
       PCN. It's not a slam-dunk argument, though, just another hoop
       for them to jump through !
       I always say make the bug***s do at least some work !!
       #Post#: 121494--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden, Maple Street - Failing to Comply with a one-way
       restriction
   DIR By: Europlus
       Date: June 11, 2026, 11:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks all for your help and guidance. I've now submitted my
       Reps, slightly amended from my draft above so I could make
       reference to the 88 day delay between alleged contravention and
       PCN issue (albeit it via the leasing company in the first
       instance).
       I'll be back with an update but given that a) I didn't fail to
       comply with a one-way restriction and b) the excessive notice
       delay, I can only expect an early positive outcome - barring any
       devilment on behalf of the issuing council... in which case it
       will be appealed
       #Post#: 121511--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden, Maple Street - Failing to Comply with a one-way
       restriction
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: June 11, 2026, 2:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Europlus link ---
       >
       > Thanks all for your help and guidance. I've now submitted my
       Reps, slightly amended from my draft above so I could make
       reference to the 88 day delay between alleged contravention and
       PCN issue (albeit it via the leasing company in the first
       instance).
       >
       > I'll be back with an update but given that a) I didn't fail to
       comply with a one-way restriction and b) the excessive notice
       delay, I can only expect an early positive outcome - barring any
       devilment on behalf of the issuing council... in which case it
       will be appealed
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Don't expect them to roll over and cancel because they won't.
       London councils ruthlessly game the system to maximise their
       income by refusing all reps however valid they are. Basically,
       people are ignorant of parking and traffic law detail, so if
       reps are refused, >95% of people then just cough-up to get the
       discount. People are also terrified of going to adjudication,
       thinking it will cost them a packet of money, whereas the
       maximum amount possible is the full PCN penalty, there being no
       other costs whatsoever.
       #Post#: 124047--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden, Maple Street - Failing to Comply with a one-way
       restriction
   DIR By: Europlus
       Date: July 8, 2026, 3:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good morning all,
       As predicted, my Reps have been rejected so I am about to submit
       an appeal to the tribunal. I have 28 days from 30 June so will
       take some time to prepare it properly.
       When I submitted my Reps, I also sent in a CEO complaint -
       specifically addressed to Mr J Rowney - but apparently it was
       just passed on to the traffic team, in which I asked about the
       number of tickets at this junction, for this offence. I've
       subsequently asked for some clarifications because they said
       there have been 9,562 PCNs at this junction of which 65 have
       been appealed and over 70% of those appeals have been won (by
       driver), cancelled for some other reason or are yet to be heard
       (lumping "cancelled" and "yet to be heard" skews the figures,
       but that's how it was presented).
       I've also asked, as prompted by the most recent appeal, if there
       is a valid traffic management order which prohibits a left turn
       at this junction. I am hoping to have a response to that, and my
       complaint follow-up, before I submit my appeal.
       I also had a response to the point about delayed issue of the
       PCN. The reason given, with dates (I'll check with leasing
       company) was:
       Contravention occurred on 7/3/26
       Original PCN issued 11/3/26
       Response to PCN (from leasing co) 15/5/26
       Transferred to me on 2/6/26
       PCN issued to me 9/6/26
       I'll keep you posted, but any suggestions would be welcomed.
       Thanks :)
       #Post#: 124057--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden, Maple Street - Failing to Comply with a one-way
       restriction
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: July 8, 2026, 5:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Another case, and Camden was there so i'd say there is potential
       for costs.
       -------------
       Case reference
       Appellant
       Authority
       VRM
       
       PCN Details
       PCN
       Contravention date
       Contravention time
       Contravention location
       Penalty amount
       Contravention
       
       Referral date
       
       Decision Date
       Adjudicator
       Appeal decision
       Direction
       Reasons
       attended the hearing of this appeal today on the Microsoft Teams
       video conferencing platform.
       The contravention alleged in these proceedings was that this
       vehicle failed to comply with a one-way restriction.
       On the council's online footage of the incident, the vehicle
       turned left at this junction in contravention, on the council's
       case as put at the hearing, of the direction to proceed ahead in
       accordance with signage posted prior to it.
       Had the PCN been issued for a failure to proceed in the
       direction shown by an arrow on a blue sign then the
       contravention may well have been made out, but it was not.
       A contravention may well have occurred in this case, but it was
       not that stated on the PCN, and I was accordingly satisfied that
       it had not occurred.
       The appeal was allowed.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 4
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page