URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 120250--------------------------------------------------
       Waltham Forest - 50L prohibited turn- Grove Road / Southwest
       Road E11
   DIR By: shah123
       Date: June 1, 2026, 5:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Pcn fr68311757
       GSV:
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/o6DgSfq7jFTbQzbD7?g_st=ic
       Letters: PCN and NoR
  HTML https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1WD4AY4lwut85QcqiS0h8aZ9En89It2Gw
       I was working in the area and recognised the multiple pedestrian
       prohibited turns all around the area. This specific sign when
       approaching was obscured with black graffiti or paint. Hence why
       i made the specific left turn, I was unable to confirm the
       signs, not clear adequate signage.
       I made this clear during the appeal process, which the LA
       haven’t called out explicitly but provided photos and
       surprisingly photos taken of the sign and date stamped it as the
       same day the alleged contravention occurred!
       By the time I received the PCN (cctv) by post and returned the
       sign still had some paint on it but looked like the weather rain
       or a scrub had reduced the obscurity.
       I want to take this forward as the evidence provided by the
       local authority, I want to challenge it given the time stamp
       isn’t on the photo provided so it could have been cleaned by
       staff and photo taken on the same day later on the day. Or more
       seriously, it isn’t authentic, I’d like the digital copy to
       check the metadata location and time of the photo was taken?
       #Post#: 120255--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest - 50L prohibited turn- Grove Road / Southwest
       Road E11
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: June 1, 2026, 5:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       No signage on video but seems to be sign on the approach on
       left.
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/35kJp8nH/wfnew-ezgif-com-video-to-gif-converter.gif
       #Post#: 120301--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest - 50L prohibited turn- Grove Road / Southwest
       Road E11
   DIR By: shah123
       Date: June 1, 2026, 9:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=2249]stamfordman[/member] yes, if you click the google
       drive link, in the NoR letter the LA have supposedly gone out on
       the same day and taken photos of the sign.
       You can see from the images the black residue is visible which
       obscured the sign
       #Post#: 120717--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest - 50L prohibited turn- Grove Road / Southwest
       Road E11
   DIR By: shah123
       Date: June 4, 2026, 8:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       any opinions on this. pushing it up.
       [member=24]Hippocrates[/member] given the CCTV does not display
       the signage (no left turn) (which was also obscured)
       similar to the bus lane appeal with TFL can I prompt them to
       prove the sign was there and clean and not obscured with paint
       or graffiti spray
       #Post#: 121945--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest - 50L prohibited turn- Grove Road / Southwest
       Road E11
   DIR By: shah123
       Date: June 16, 2026, 7:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       pushing this up. for some thoughts
       i wanted to check if my appeal for taking the left turn is valid
       on the basis:
       1. cctv does not display sign (worked with tfl appeal on a bus
       lane cctv charge)
       2. sign was obscured with black paint, local authority has tried
       to mitigate this appeal point I made, with photos of the sign,
       taken on the same day I made the left turn. I want to challenge
       this and ask for time stamp and digital copy to verify the
       metadata that it was truly taken at that time
       #Post#: 122727--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest - 50L prohibited turn- Grove Road / Southwest
       Road E11
   DIR By: shah123
       Date: June 23, 2026, 5:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       bump - any advice helpful how to structure challenge to the
       photo evidence provided
       and video evidence does not show me passing the sign (have won
       appeal with tfl bus lane in same manner)
       #Post#: 128285--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest - 50L prohibited turn- Grove Road / Southwest
       Road E11
   DIR By: shah123
       Date: August 19, 2026, 7:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi experts, can I ask if the CCTV does not display me passing
       the signage is that valid grounds to appeal, I am thinking about
       the tfl bus lane cctv appeal argument
       additionally the local authority has provided inaccurate
       photographs with the sign cleaned. photos from the same day
       (date stamped but not time stamped), can I request the digital
       copy of said photo to confirm that it was after I had made the
       turn.
       the sign no turn was obscured
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1