DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 12586--------------------------------------------------
Re: DVLA SAR data reliable?
DIR By: DWMB2
Date: December 17, 2023, 9:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Scientist and Saint link ---
>
> There could be a good reason why the keeper would not identify
the driver even if it were not them.
>
--- End Quote ---
Indeed, but that isn't what I was saying.
My point was that a judge may take the view that defendant who
was not driving would say "I was not the driver" (regardless of
whether they choose to say who was driving).
A keeper who was driving obviously can't say that, and must rely
on seeking to put the parking company to proof that he was
indeed driving.
#Post#: 12688--------------------------------------------------
Re: DVLA SAR data reliable?
DIR By: guest968
Date: December 19, 2023, 11:17 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: slapdash link ---
>
> The underlying contract was formed by the driver, whoever that
may be.
>
--- End Quote ---
The driver disputes the existence of an underlying contract.
The parking company are refusing to provide proof that they had
the right to enter into a contract with the driver, but that
argument was put to one side when it became known that they
don't have the right which they claim to pursue the keeper for
the alleged debt.
I.e. the hope is that the issue of the existence of any debt in
the first place becomes irrelevant because they have nobody to
pursue anyway.
#Post#: 12689--------------------------------------------------
Re: DVLA SAR data reliable?
DIR By: guest968
Date: December 19, 2023, 11:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
>
> IMO, it's much more fundamental.
>
> If a creditor reasonably believes that the keeper was the
driver when they start to pursue the alleged debt then it's an
abuse of process to issue a spurious PCN addressed to the keeper
dressed up in PoFA-like references,
>
--- End Quote ---
It's not merely "dressed up in PoFA-like references" - the NTK
includes
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/CR6fD1XQ/Screen-Hunter-1745.jpg
HTML https://postimg.cc/CR6fD1XQ
And the letter from their Recovery Agent includes:
[indent]We maintain that the PCN was rightly issued under the
protection of Freedoms Act 2021 and
are Client is legally entitled to pursue you as the Registered
Keeper of the vehicle for this
balance.[/indent]
*****************************************************
Page 3 of 3
DIR Previous Page