URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 118851--------------------------------------------------
       Smart Parking PCN – Overstay – Cornwall Services PL26 8UF
   DIR By: big_bad_golf
       Date: May 16, 2026, 8:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       My relative as registered keeper has received the att. PCN from
       Smart Parking.
       As you can see it alleges a 4+hr stay at Bodmin services PL26
       8UF, which seems unlikely at best for a small A-Road services.
       However, being elderly there is no obvious 'smart phone' based
       data we can use as loose evidence, e.g a photo 2 hrs later with
       geodata 20 miles away.
       They do agree that the photos provided show registration plates
       matching, e.g. this is a mistake but not an OCR misrecognition
       based one.
       It states the date of contravention as 17/4/26 with date issued
       as 05/05/26, received in post this morning.
       He has only sent the front page for now but there is no option
       to appeal on the front page, only pay!
  HTML https://ibb.co/y2BWF0T
       I will chase the rear ASAP.
       #Post#: 118854--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking PCN – Overstay – Cornwall Services PL26 8UF
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: May 16, 2026, 8:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/read-this-first-private-parking-charges-forum-guide/
       #Post#: 118855--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking PCN – Overstay – Cornwall Services PL26 8UF
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: May 16, 2026, 8:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If the driver is not identified it seems likely that Smart has
       issued the notice too late to hold the registered keeper liable.
       #Post#: 118856--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking PCN – Overstay – Cornwall Services PL26 8UF
   DIR By: big_bad_golf
       Date: May 16, 2026, 8:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks for reply, here's the rear image
       I assume they KNOW it's non-compliant with POFA when they don't
       even mention it themselves?
  HTML https://ibb.co/zWW06ps9
       #Post#: 118859--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking PCN – Overstay – Cornwall Services PL26 8UF
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: May 16, 2026, 9:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Smart currently seem to have two templates, one of which
       mentions PoFA 2012 and one of which doesn’t. As does Parking
       Eye. So relatively easy to spot.
       17/4 would normally require a posting/issue date of 29/4 or
       earlier.
       #Post#: 118863--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking PCN – Overstay – Cornwall Services PL26 8UF
   DIR By: big_bad_golf
       Date: May 16, 2026, 9:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Excellent, so assume I've done right by advising my relative to
       use the reply template from here -
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/pcn-cardiff-ncp/msg102882/#msg102882
       --- Quote ---
       > I am the keeper of the vehicle and I dispute your “parking
       charge”. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I
       will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your
       client/landowner.
       >
       > As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL
       the requirements of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA
       2012), you are unable to hold the keeper of the vehicle liable
       for the charge. Partial or even substantial compliance is not
       sufficient. There will be no admission as to who was driving and
       no inference or assumptions can be drawn. COMPANY has relied on
       contract law allegations of breach against the driver only.
       >
       > The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have
       been the driver, nor pursued under some strained interpretation
       of the law of agency. Your NtK can only ever attempt to hold the
       driver liable.
       >
       > Further, you are now on notice that I am also reporting
       COMPANY to the DVLA for breach of the Private Parking Single
       Code of Practice, Section 8.1.1(d). You will be aware that DVLA
       data access is conditional upon compliance obligations, and that
       breaches engage your KADOE contract. I will not set out the
       detail here; you are invited to look up Section 8.1.1(d)
       yourself.
       >
       > COMPANY has no prospect of success at POPLA. You are urged to
       save us both a complete waste of time and cancel this charge.
       --- End Quote ---
       Not had to deal with this since the days of PEPIPOO which I've
       been advised this forum has many of the same contibutors?
       Thanks again!
       #Post#: 124357--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking PCN – Overstay – Cornwall Services PL26 8UF
   DIR By: big_bad_golf
       Date: July 11, 2026, 1:03 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Just a quick update. Potential success?
       In years past I expected a brief 'you are not compliant' letter
       to result in a salty 'as a gesture of goodwill...' reply, as
       I've had an a couple of occasions.
       Instead my relative soon got a reply to the informal challenge
       saying that they couldn't care less about what they'd written
       and the PCN stood.
       I can see that times have changed and these companies are even
       more brazen than ever. I don't think this should be compared to
       the PO I.T affair,
       and yet there is a certain similarity that I can imagine elderly
       people with 'fines' escalating into the 100s as they simply do
       not understand
       what is going on, get bad advice, don't know how best to appeal,
       etc.... And the use of taxpayer funded court infrastructure to
       back up a racket is analogue.
       Anyway, after that, I said 'sod it, I know this is usually a
       total waste of energy, but maybe you should just try to contact
       the services?'
       My relative did - I don't have details, but apparently they
       seemed reasonably interested rather than just saying 'nothing to
       do with us' and hanging up.
       I suspect this overstay is a known problem happening all the
       time. They took the PCN number, reg number, stated it would be
       cancelled. It's unfortunate
       it was only over the phone. But, that was a month ago - I have
       told him to be vigilant for any update from Dumb Parking, there
       hasn't been a 'we've cancelled it'
       letter, but also nothing else now for 6 weeks. No DCBL nonsense.
       I'm aware that people talk of letters 2 years later. Fingers
       crossed...
       #Post#: 124359--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking PCN – Overstay – Cornwall Services PL26 8UF
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: July 11, 2026, 1:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good, you went down the route often referred to as “Plan A” both
       here and on PePiPoo, ie contact the landowner.
       File everything carefully in the absence of a formal
       cancellation, they sometimes resurrect these things and have six
       years in which to do so. But it looks good.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1