URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 118814--------------------------------------------------
       Received notice of Judgment for Claimant (in default)
   DIR By: drb72
       Date: May 16, 2026, 3:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello
       I read the thread on HMCT issuing CCJs incorrectly and I think
       it applies to me. DCB legal have been sending letters before
       claim and I've responded to those within 30 days and in the last
       exchange in March/May I told them they had still not given me
       the information I requested and that they needed to so I could
       prep my defense.
       The last date from them was March, the last reply from me April,
       within the 30 days, and nothing until today when a CCJ default
       judgment falls through my letterbox.
       I can't tell if its the same as the example in the sticky
       because the picture in that thread says 'content not viewable in
       your region' (accessing from UK).
       I haven't ever received any notice of a claim being raised in
       the courts in the first place, it was only letters from DCB
       legal. Never any MCOL, nothing, just the judgment today.
       Is the best course of action paying then applying to set aside
       or raising the lack of an actual claim raised?  Is it possible
       DCB applied for judgment in default despite my being in touch
       with them more than once (I received acknowledgment emails to
       each of my replies so I have the paper trail)
       #Post#: 118816--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Received notice of Judgment for Claimant (in default)
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: May 16, 2026, 3:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think your first step needs to be to contact whoever sent the
       default judgement and ask them what’s going on. I wouldn’t pay
       anything yet because this could be a route involving a lot of
       money and difficulty to unravel.
       The “content not viewable” is because imgur is now blocked in
       the UK but wasn’t at the original time of posting.
       #Post#: 118817--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Received notice of Judgment for Claimant (in default)
   DIR By: drb72
       Date: May 16, 2026, 3:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The judgment was sent by HMCTS.  Did you mean contact the
       lawyers or the courts?
       I don't want an erroneous judgment being entered in the open
       register of course.  The letter date is a few days ago.  I'm
       presuming there's a period where payment can be made prior to
       any appeals to make sure that enter in the register doesn't
       happen?
       #Post#: 118819--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Received notice of Judgment for Claimant (in default)
   DIR By: drb72
       Date: May 16, 2026, 4:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I just had a look at the pictures in the HMCTS thread using the
       VPN. They’re the same as the letter I received.
       Is there a recommend course of action?
       #Post#: 118824--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Received notice of Judgment for Claimant (in default)
   DIR By: RichardW
       Date: May 16, 2026, 5:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As per the read me first sticky, post up the docs you have
       received.
       #Post#: 119133--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Received notice of Judgment for Claimant (in default)
   DIR By: drb72
       Date: May 19, 2026, 3:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Here are the redacted docs
  HTML https://www.imagebam.com/view/ME1D78W8
       
  HTML https://www.imagebam.com/view/ME1D78W9
       
       #Post#: 119134--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Received notice of Judgment for Claimant (in default)
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: May 19, 2026, 3:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: drb72 link ---
       >
       > I don't want an erroneous judgment being entered in the open
       register of course.  The letter date is a few days ago.  I'm
       presuming there's a period where payment can be made prior to
       any appeals to make sure that enter in the register doesn't
       happen?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Within one month of the date on the form, which you have
       obscured for some reason. It says this on the form you have
       posted.
       #Post#: 119144--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Received notice of Judgment for Claimant (in default)
   DIR By: drb72
       Date: May 19, 2026, 4:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: jfollows link ---
       >
       > [quote author=drb72 link=topic=10833.msg118817#msg118817
       date=1778921014]
       > I don't want an erroneous judgment being entered in the open
       register of course.  The letter date is a few days ago.  I'm
       presuming there's a period where payment can be made prior to
       any appeals to make sure that enter in the register doesn't
       happen?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Within one month of the date on the form, which you have
       obscured for some reason. It says this on the form you have
       posted.
       [/quote]
       Ahh yes I see that now. I hadn't read those bits before.  I've
       redacted any potential identifying information from the form. Is
       that what you meant by obscured? I removed the reference number
       alongside anything else that I thought might be particular.
       You said earlier in the thread that contacting whoever sent the
       judgment but that wasn't completely clear to me. HCMTS sent the
       judgment but were you referring to the people at DCB legal that
       were acting for the claimant?
       #Post#: 119148--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Received notice of Judgment for Claimant (in default)
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: May 19, 2026, 4:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If you think the court got it wrong, follow the instructions on
       the form and contact the court. DCB Legal has nothing to do with
       it.
       #Post#: 119151--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Received notice of Judgment for Claimant (in default)
   DIR By: drb72
       Date: May 19, 2026, 4:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ok but the whole reason I started this thread was the fact
       there's a sticky saying HCMTS are potentially sending erroneous
       judgments to people.
       My case is the first of the two options - receiving a default
       judgment without having received a Claim Form - and the sticky
       says to let the forum know.  I'm doing that and asking for
       advice on how to approach HCMTS in respect of a likely error on
       their part in the hope someone will have encountered the same
       situation before and have info they can pass on.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 2
   DIR Next Page