URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 15805--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest Code 34 - Being in a Bus Lane
   DIR By: hirerspcn
       Date: February 17, 2024, 4:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have received a reply by post. [Notice of Rejection of
       Representation]
       Page 1:
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/5hmLFJR/IMG-3435.jpg
       Close Up Images (Page 1):
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/7QcKmBp/IMG-3437.jpg
       Page 2:
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/WBtCsyv/IMG-3436.jpg
       
       Page 3:
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/RvPKnV3/IMG-3438.jpg
       Page 4:
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/ZcnCpW8/IMG-3439.jpg
       Page 5:
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/rskYQtN/IMG-3440.jpg
       Page 6:
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/n7rYdxZ/IMG-3441.jpg
       Page 7:
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/t3Vmq4F/IMG-3442.jpg
       I have 2 issues with this letter, so I could use some help
       understanding this.
       1. The supplementary images supplied by WF is not where the
       alleged contravention occurred.
       The first image the location is here:
  HTML https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5599898,-0.0090291,3a,75y,135.66h,79.54t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1spYPqPMsZfwQ5W3X8E0INcQ!2e0!5s20220401T000000!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
       The second image, the location is here but there is no bus sign
       (must have been put up after Google street view April 2022):
  HTML https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5600559,-0.0093074,3a,32.9y,92.91h,89.83t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sOvtIJRw1einu3d8f237kGQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
       2. Where WF have provided a link to the CCTV certificates page
       (
  HTML https://www.walthamforest.gov.uk/neighbourhoods/crime-and-community-safety/closed-circuit-television-cctv),<br
       />i found a map where there is no CCTV icon on the map of the
       alleged contravention.
       Map here:
  HTML https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=1oF0-Wgbo0jNq0i0D5dGfuQLOxPnxgVy_&ll=51.59749104335556%2C-0.012309149999998326&z=13
       #Post#: 15808--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest Code 34 - Being in a Bus Lane
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: February 17, 2024, 6:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Somewhat odd parking restrictions, so until we see the PCN, it
       is difficult to give advice as so much depends on times the OP
       was there.
       #Post#: 15811--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest Code 34 - Being in a Bus Lane
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: February 18, 2024, 7:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If you are certain those images are wrong, then you have a
       strong case.  Also, their reply to the camera certification is
       nonsense.  Up to you as to whether you want to go to the
       Tribunal and I am happy to take this one on free of charge.
       Neither have they addressed the 958 warning sign.
       I would say Tribunal time.
       #Post#: 15830--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest Code 34 - Being in a Bus Lane
   DIR By: hirerspcn
       Date: February 18, 2024, 2:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes the images they have provided are 100% incorrect, which i
       have linked to the location.
       When you say “up to you”, what do you mean? Do i have other
       options?
       I would prefer the best option.
       Thanks
       #Post#: 15837--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest Code 34 - Being in a Bus Lane
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: February 18, 2024, 3:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I would say go to the Tribunal.  Pretty good chance of winning
       in my view.
       #Post#: 15858--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest Code 34 - Being in a Bus Lane
   DIR By: hirerspcn
       Date: February 18, 2024, 8:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks for your reply.
       You said in a previous reply you can represent me in tribunal. I
       would happily accept your offer, what should I do from my end?
       Also for the form that came with the rejection letter, is there
       a certain way for it to be filled? Can it be filled online? I do
       not want to accidentally write something wrong.
       Thanks
       #Post#: 15878--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest Code 34 - Being in a Bus Lane
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: February 19, 2024, 5:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I will PM you my details.
       #Post#: 17662--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest Code 34 - Being in a Bus Lane
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: March 19, 2024, 5:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lfd_ecu1KMng82-Pests4854tVZrPAnw/view
       This is the only TMO supplied.
       see page 5:
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/walthamforest-34-being-in-a-bus-lane-high-road-leyton-(bus-lane)-e10/msg17659/#msg17659
       #Post#: 17723--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest Code 34 - Being in a Bus Lane
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: March 19, 2024, 1:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=24]Hippocrates[/member] see these cases:
       Perinpanayagam Thileepan v Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
       (2210486067, 9 October 2021)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kXzveBWU2jCtIPDhrYDpPQotUCi3qmXU
       Anjum Vahora v London Borough of Newham (2230470161, 18 December
       2023)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xcpvvMeibRYURHnpi14SNuLWN44Vmxx3
       Stanmore Quality Surfacing Ltd v Royal Borough of Kingston Upon
       Thames (2230545781, 22 January 2024)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yd2915G08XjH6qO57IbEMCGdEjNNCPlx
       If they've only provided an amending order you can certainly run
       the argument, though there's no guarantee all adjudicators would
       accept it.
       #Post#: 17726--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest Code 34 - Being in a Bus Lane
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: March 19, 2024, 2:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Greatly appreciated.
       *****************************************************
       Page 4 of 5
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page