URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Speeding and other criminal offences
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 118193--------------------------------------------------
       Late NIP for company car 30mph in 20mph
   DIR By: tramsmantles
       Date: May 9, 2026, 5:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hey everyone,
       Long time lurker and hold-over from the old Pepipoo days.
       Before I start, everything is alleged.
       This is in a company car, lease company is the owner and on the
       V5C.
       Timeline:
       3 March: Alleged offence of doing 30 in a 20mph zone around half
       a mile from home.
       4 March: Lease company received NIP
       9 March: Lease company responded nominating me
       1 May:  I received the NIP
       The camera van was parked in a residents permit zone on a
       residential street, the speedo checked and, you can fill in the
       blanks...The location approximately here heading toward Bradford
       Road.
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/ZaYZp3suRMbbCrhY6
       As an interesting aside, I noticed a man in a high-vis with
       police style markings putting up new 20 mph repeater speed signs
       just a day or two ago around the village.
       I have the NIP, I need to respond within 28 days, I'd appreciate
       advice on how to deal with this.
       I've not posted the NIP yet but can do so using an external
       service.
       I last did a SAC in 2019.
       Very many thanks.
       #Post#: 118199--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Late NIP for company car 30mph in 20mph
   DIR By: andy_foster
       Date: May 9, 2026, 6:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Off the top of my head, there are 2 types of 20mph "restriction"
       - a 20mph zone and a 20 mph limit.
       A 20mph zone requires terminal signs at the start/finish of the
       zone, and traffic calming measures (with stipulation on maximum
       distances between such measures).
       A 20mph limit requires terminal signs and regular repeaters.
       The signage on GSV indicates that it is a 20mph zone, and
       appears to have quite a few traffic calming measures (or at
       least have had when the images were recorded).
       If "throughout the village" (where the repeater signs were being
       put up) is also a 20mph zone, rather than a 20mph limit, then
       there would appear to be no requirement for repeater signs, and
       presumably placing them would even be unlawful.
       If the signage (including requirements for traffic calming
       measures) is defective, that might constitute a defence or
       defence strategy*. If the TRO is defective, then presumably
       there would be no 20mph restriction in law, so no offence could
       have been committed.
       Were the camera van was parked is utterly irrelevant, and the
       requirement to serve a NIP on the RK within the 14 days appears
       to have been complied with.
       Regardless of whether or not you have any defence to the
       speeding charge, you must name the driver by 28th May.
       For speeds of up to 10% +9mph over the limit (so 31 in a 20
       limit) you should expect to be offered an SAC. Received wisdom
       suggests that the s. 172 response admitting to being the driver
       would need to be received within 3 months of the offence, and
       the course completed within 4 months of the offence  - so unless
       you have a reason for delaying, it would seem prudent to do so
       sooner rather than later.
       You are far too far from timing out for delaying to be a
       worthwhile strategy to cause a time-out.
       The only other common reason for delaying is if you were trying
       to get advance sight of the photo(s) on the ruse of asking for
       them in order to help to identify the driver.
       #Post#: 118217--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Late NIP for company car 30mph in 20mph
   DIR By: tramsmantles
       Date: May 10, 2026, 5:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks Andy.
       Interesting potential defence strategy. Is it prudent to look
       into the TRO? The man putting up signage felt oddly
       coincidental. It's worth noting this was within the 'Zone' which
       is furnished with traffic calming measures as you suggest is
       appropriate for a 'zone'.
       A quick search has yielded:
       - TRO:
  HTML https://store.traffweb.app/leeds/documents/parkmap/sched/Dated%20Citywide%20Map-Based%20Speed%20Limit%20Order%2030%201%2025.pdf
       - Map of the tip of the street where the alleged office took
       place:
  HTML https://ibb.co/qLYSxdY4
       (yellow highlight the tip of the
       street, though it continues onto another map page).
       - My unskilled interpretation (please rip apart) is that the TRO
       refers to *speed limits* not a *zone*. New
       Street is signed as a zone:
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/mvpkqYCWnS8JAxuu5
       
       - And for completeness: here's the man putting up repeaters on
       an adjacent street which still appears to be in the same 'zone':
  HTML https://ibb.co/gM6k7RHf
       The driver will be identified today.
       #Post#: 118635--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Late NIP for company car 30mph in 20mph
   DIR By: tramsmantles
       Date: May 13, 2026, 4:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Got my SAC invite today.
       Is there a potential defense based on the faulty signage?
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1