DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: News / Press Articles
*****************************************************
#Post#: 118079--------------------------------------------------
Key parking fine rules clarified by appeals body - as operators
increasingly giving up cases
DIR By: ZigZagZog
Date: May 8, 2026, 1:58 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://news.sky.com/story/money-live-consumer-personal-finance-tips-sky-news-latest-13040934?postid=11649589#liveblog-body
A record number of private parking fine were successfully
appealed to the industry body last year, the Money blog can
reveal.
Britons submitted 107,202 appeals via the POPLA process in the
year to October 2025, the first time ever that's breached
100,000.
And there was a significant rise in cancelled fines as the
impact of a new appeals charter was felt.
The numbers are...
39,522 appeals were uncontested by operator and therefore
cancelled;
14,578 contested appeals were successful;
53,102 were refused.
That means 50.5% of appeals resulted in cancellation.
POPLA also asked operators to cancel 343 fines as a gesture of
goodwill due to mitigating circumstances. This worked 201 times.
Many of the appeals centred on motorists not understanding the
rules - either because they were unclear or because of
misinformation online.
"Confusion is clearly profitable," said consumer disputes expert
Scott Dixon, who frequently points out that private parking
tickets are invoices, not fines.
"It's mindblowing how many people just pay it without question
because they think it's a 'fine' - that's part of the business
model.
"That explains why parking charge notices (invoices issued by
parking firms) look similar to penalty charge notices (council
fines)."
The government is still consulting on the introduction of its
own code of practice.
POPLA said it saw "significant activity" with appeals on keying
errors, airport drop offs, liability and where AI was used by
the operator.
In a bid the end confusion among motorists, it clarified the
rules in a few common areas.
Not paying in time
Car parks increasingly require payment within a set number of
minutes, but motorists may be hampered by poor mobile signal or
issues with apps.
Fines should often not be issued where full payment has
eventually been made, POPLA has clarified...
In February 2025 the Private Parking Scrutiny and Advice Panel
(PPSAP)... updated the appeals charter to include that motorists
using private car parks equipped with camera technology - such
as Automatic Number Plate Recognition or CCTV monitoring -
should no longer receive a parking charge provided they pay for
the full duration of their stay before leaving the car park.
Keying errors
This is a topic we explored here earlier this year...
POPLA said...
If a motorist has made a simple error, such as transposing 0 for
an O, parking operators are expected to identify this and not
issue parking charges. If an operator does issue a parking
charge, they should cancel it in full when a motorist appeals.
If a motorist makes an error that a parking operator cannot
identify, for example they enter several digits incorrectly, the
operator is entitled to charge up to £20 to cover administration
costs.
We've seen a lot of appeals where operators have met the
expectation of offering a reduction to £20, but the motorist has
rejected this offer and appealed to POPLA. Many motorists
believe the parking charge must be invalid - or the operator
wouldn't be offering a reduction. This often results in worse
outcomes for the motorist - because if they have made an error
when inputting their registration, it's likely their appeal will
be refused and they will become liable for the full parking
charge.
Airport drop-offs
POPLA said it had seen an increase in appeals due to recent
changes from barrier-controlled exits to barrierless systems,
along with the shift to payment after exit within a specific
timeframe. It added...
With these car parks, motorists are often expected to pay online
by midnight the day after their visit to the drop off zone. Many
motorists forget to pay by the deadline. Our advice to motorists
when visiting airport drop off zones is to ensure they read the
terms and conditions and make payment promptly - the longer it
is left, the easier it is to forget.
Liability disputes
Many appellants say they were not the driver at the time of the
incident and contend that the parking operator cannot hold them
liable.
But POPLA said...
Parking operators can transfer liability to the vehicle's keeper
if the keeper fails to identify the driver after receiving an
enforceable notification.
Parking operators are experienced at sending notices to keepers
and, generally, notices tend to contain accurate information and
are sent within relevant deadlines.
If a vehicle keeper was not driving the vehicle at the time of
the alleged improper parking, they can provide the parking
operator with the details of the person who was driving to stop
liability transferring to them.
If they don't want to do this, they can seek details from the
driver and include appeal details relating to what happened on
the day and why they believe the parking charge is invalid or
unfair.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1