URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 117623--------------------------------------------------
       Defence Struck Out 
   DIR By: cinders
       Date: May 3, 2026, 4:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       I am a little lost in the process, I have defended a supermarket
       parking ticket twice before using the advise on here and been
       successful. However this time following the mediation meeting
       04.03.26 I have received the letter linked below.
       Defence Struck Out
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/9oy1p481s6bqspeyj3iub/20260503_093639.jpg?rlkey=na7qdpk9uh3yd0jcded3m3xhb&st=a61t3w1e&dl=0
       Claim Status
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/bndv2ykukyg89vuisku47/Screenshot-2026-05-03-at-10.55.16.png?rlkey=um73cf4fpfkqn4suw0hgp28f7&st=9wlt9nw6&dl=0
       If you could let me know if you need more information and what I
       do from here, thank you.
       #Post#: 117632--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defence Struck Out 
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: May 3, 2026, 6:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       To advise we'll obviously need to see your defence, and the
       particulars of claim to which you were responding.
       Likewise any background to the case and any pre action
       correspondence (incl. Initial notices, any appeals etc.).
       This might not be the case, but from the wording of that strike
       out order, it seems you may have copied and pasted someone
       else's defence rather than writing one that specifically
       responds to the claim.
       #Post#: 117633--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defence Struck Out 
   DIR By: cinders
       Date: May 3, 2026, 7:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi thank you for your response.
       My defence is linked below along with the original claim form.
       Sorry for some reason it won't let me edit the links on this
       reply. Please let me know if you need anything else from me. I
       really appreciate the help.
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/jmmpfy8chbrppgcah81xp/Mcol-Defence.docx?rlkey=vhfgz2ewpqnkco8nwyt1o0386&st=6lhp53k7&dl=0
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/jmmpfy8chbrppgcah81xp/Mcol-Defence.docx?rlkey=vhfgz2ewpqnkco8nwyt1o0386&st=6lhp53k7&dl=0
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ihtb4vba85yencaehmv4c/20260503_130614.jpg?rlkey=mzeuw50s7li8iqos3rt1gwulf&st=6ayq6a5b&dl=0
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ihtb4vba85yencaehmv4c/20260503_130614.jpg?rlkey=mzeuw50s7li8iqos3rt1gwulf&st=6ayq6a5b&dl=0
       #Post#: 117634--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defence Struck Out 
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: May 3, 2026, 7:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       We need the background to this, your story and the original
       Notice to Keeper, if you want help with the construction of a
       defence deemed more acceptable and appropriate to your
       circumstances.
       Your problem seems to be that your original defence was copied
       from here, and may be applicable, but is vague and not specific
       to your circumstances.
       It’s always the problem with “templates” which some people seem
       to demand. In your case it looks like you did some research
       first.
       It is certainly true that the Particulars of Claim are woeful
       and do not meet the requirements of the pre-action protocols.
       But in this case the court has decided that this point is not
       sufficient for a defence.
       #Post#: 117636--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defence Struck Out 
   DIR By: cinders
       Date: May 3, 2026, 7:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       Parked in Tesco Huddersfield 2024, I go every few weeks so no
       idea what was different about this time in particular. I did
       indeed copy my defence from here as I have used that before on
       previous tickets for parking in a supermarket that I am using.
       This is the notice to keeper.
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/jpopxwhe4nnzuzrjoitke/20260503_133123.jpg?rlkey=kf89fullr0wytot35612wt81x&st=tsb2qu4o&dl=0
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/jpopxwhe4nnzuzrjoitke/20260503_133123.jpg?rlkey=kf89fullr0wytot35612wt81x&st=tsb2qu4o&dl=0
       #Post#: 117637--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defence Struck Out 
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: May 3, 2026, 7:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That appears to be a covering letter from the courts, not a
       Notice to Keeper.
       #Post#: 117638--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defence Struck Out 
   DIR By: cinders
       Date: May 3, 2026, 8:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       I don't appear to have a Notice to Keeper. I just got the cover
       letter and N1SDT form. 05.22.25
       #Post#: 117641--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defence Struck Out 
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: May 3, 2026, 8:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Your defence needs to be a story relating why the driver is not
       liable, in the face of claims that the driver read the terms
       clearly indicated by signs and accepted them and entered into a
       contract by parking.
       Why is the contract invalid, or the driver not liable?
       In the absence of a notice to keeper, you can request a copy but
       not necessarily in time to construct a defence around it. Look
       up Subject Access Request if you want to try. You won’t get a
       response within 9 days, by 12 May as required.
       #Post#: 117642--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defence Struck Out 
   DIR By: cinders
       Date: May 3, 2026, 9:05 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       If I can't get this information in time, what are my options?
       #Post#: 117643--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defence Struck Out 
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: May 3, 2026, 9:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: cinders link ---
       >
       > Hi,
       >
       > If I can't get this information in time, what are my options?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       You need to write and submit a defence. If you want to, post it
       here before the deadline (4pm on 12 May) you may get input to
       improve it. It’s your defence and your story.
       Remember that the claim will be against you as the registered
       keeper for actions committed by the driver originally. If the
       driver is not identified, they may be unable to transfer
       liability to you. But without the original NtK this will be a
       harder case to make.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 2
   DIR Next Page