URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Speeding and other criminal offences
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 117293--------------------------------------------------
       SJP received after responding to FPN
   DIR By: Bobzzz
       Date: April 29, 2026, 3:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi, I submitted my response to FPN and filled out section 2 and
       5. The only slight error I can see is the I included the last 2
       digits of my driver number (maybe I shouldn't have ?)
       I was driving, the car is registered in my name and my license
       shows my current address.
       The witness statement says.
       Driver failed to satisfy requirements of FPN, the FPN was paid
       but they failed to provide license details.for endorsement as a
       refund was requested.
       They have supplied a copy of the FPN which shows my driver
       number.
       Have I missed something? How to proceed?
       Thanks
       #Post#: 117302--------------------------------------------------
       Re: SJP received after responding to FPN
   DIR By: BertB
       Date: April 29, 2026, 4:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       When you say FPN, do you mean the Notice of Intended Prosecution
       or the subsequent follow up document inviting you to apart with
       £100 of you hard earned?
       A common occurrence we find is that drivers confuse the two and
       having provided it on their driver submission, believe that it
       is done. The requirement is to also provide it when paying the
       COFP as well, either online or by post.
       Edit. If it helps there is no FPN. There is a NIP, a S.172
       requirement to provide driver details and a Conditional Offer of
       a Fixed Penalty (COFP).
       #Post#: 117306--------------------------------------------------
       Re: SJP received after responding to FPN
   DIR By: JustLoveCars
       Date: April 29, 2026, 4:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Bobzzz link ---
       >
       > The only slight error I can see is the I included the last 2
       digits of my driver number (maybe I shouldn't have ?)
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       You need to expand on this... At the point of accepting the CoFP
       they would request full details and you say you supplied just
       the last 2 digits?
       #Post#: 117312--------------------------------------------------
       Re: SJP received after responding to FPN
   DIR By: NewJudge
       Date: April 29, 2026, 4:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It doesn't really matter what you did or didn't do. You have an
       SJPN and you must deal with it.
       Respond by pleading guilty and in the "Mitigation" section
       explain that you were offered a fixed penalty but an
       administrative error meant it could not be taken up. Go on to
       ask the court if  they would kindly consider sentencing you at
       the fixed penalty equivalent. They have guidance which suggests
       they can consider this in your circumstances.
       #Post#: 117318--------------------------------------------------
       Re: SJP received after responding to FPN
   DIR By: Bobzzz
       Date: April 29, 2026, 4:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: BertB link ---
       >
       > When you say FPN, do you mean the Notice of Intended
       Prosecution or the subsequent follow up document inviting you to
       apart with £100 of you hard earned?
       >
       > A common occurrence we find is that drivers confuse the two
       and having provided it on their driver submission, believe that
       it is done. The requirement is to also provide it when paying
       the COFP as well, either online or by post.
       >
       > Edit. If it helps there is no FPN. There is a NIP, a S.172
       requirement to provide driver details and a Conditional Offer of
       a Fixed Penalty (COFP).
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       To clarify: From the statement
       A notice of Intended Prosecution was received from myself
       confirming I was the driver
       A Conditional Offer of a Fixed Penalty was sent
       Driver failed to satisfy requirements of Fixed Penalty, the FP
       was paid but they failed to provide license details for
       endorsement as a refund was requested.
       So maybe I didn't state my driver number when making the
       payment.
       I cant see any record of paying it from my bank, do you know who
       the payment would have been sent to? From memory it was £100,
       does that sound right?
       #Post#: 117327--------------------------------------------------
       Re: SJP received after responding to FPN
   DIR By: BertB
       Date: April 29, 2026, 6:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes, 3 points & £100 is the usual amount for the fixed penalty.
       Your licence details have to be submitted (again) along with
       payment to satisfy the requirements of the offer.
       #Post#: 117334--------------------------------------------------
       Re: SJP received after responding to FPN
   DIR By: andy_foster
       Date: April 29, 2026, 8:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: NewJudge link ---
       >
       > It doesn't really matter what you did or didn't do. You have
       an SJPN and you must deal with it.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       That would seem to depend on whether or not the OP satisfied the
       statutory requirements as to providing identification details.
       If, as he initially appeared to be suggesting, he provided all
       the required information plus the issue number of his photocard,
       and the CTO are being twits about it, then it would seem to be
       unlawful to prosecute him.
       If, he provided the issue number instead of the licence number,
       he deserves to be taken out into the street and shot. In the
       face.
       However, as the OP, who apparently has a copy of the information
       he provided in the SJPN bundle, can't remember what information
       he provided, I am leaning towards the latter.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1