URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: News / Press Articles
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 11752--------------------------------------------------
       Parking sign emblem 6cm too small 
       By: John U.K. Date: December 2, 2023, 7:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Somehow I think it may fail at tribunal, despite the optimism of
       Mr.Burton and the reporters - still
  HTML https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/12/01/parking-fine-revoked-as-driver-proves-signs-too-small/
       [font=Times New Roman]Driver wins parking fine battle because
       signs were 6cm too small[/font]
       County court backs appeal after man who was issued with a
       penalty charge in Bury measures the size of blue ‘P’ notice
       By Telegraph Reporters 1 December 2023 • 6:15pm
       Parking signs where the blue ‘P’ box is less than 20cm cannot be
       enforced, a driver has successfully argued.
       Chris Burton, 42, found that several blue ‘P’ parking notices in
       Bury, Greater Manchester, were short of this 20cm (about 8in)
       requirement.
       Mr Burton used a tape measure to investigate the size of the
       signs after being hit with a £60 fine while dropping off his
       father for a hospital appointment. A sign marking the entrance
       to a permit parking area must bear a blue ‘P’ symbol that is
       200mm in height, with a legend below of 40mm, according to The
       Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016.
       A county court judgment ruled that the order for Mr Burton to
       pay his parking ticket should be revoked after he submitted
       pages of evidence, including the size of the signs which
       indicated that the area was residents’ parking only.
       Mr Burton was issued with a parking ticket in May, when he
       claimed there were no available parking spaces at the hospital
       and so found a space for his Volkswagen Sharan on a nearby road.
       However, when he returned to the car, he discovered a penalty
       charge notice (PCN) on his windscreen.
       He appealed the ticket online and said it was rejected within
       minutes, so he appealed again in June and said he heard nothing
       back for months.
       However, in September he received a letter from the council
       saying that it was taking the case to Northampton county court
       to recover costs.
       Mr Burton had initially complained that the two residents-only
       parking signs in the area had either been covered up by a bush
       or turned around, but he later decided to measure the signs and
       sent all his evidence to the court.
       Mr Burton said: “UK law says signs have to be 20cm in size, but
       when I checked the signs that were there, they were only 14cm.”
       The judgment said: “It is ordered that the order for recovery of
       unpaid penalty charge be revoked.”
       A spokesman for Bury council said that the sizing issue only
       affected “a tiny number” of signs located at residents-only
       parking zones and “not to parking signs in general across the
       borough”.
       Mr Burton said that the matter has since been taken to tribunal,
       with Bury council not yet aware of its outcome.
       It is understood that the PCN is still active until that ruling
       is published, however if the tribunal rules in Mr Burton’s
       favour, it will be cancelled.
       The council spokesman said: “Mr Burton was issued with a PCN for
       parking without a permit in a residents-only parking zone near
       Fairfield hospital.
       “His initial appeal was rejected, and he was informed that he
       could either pay the PCN or appeal to the independent parking
       tribunal in Manchester.
       “If he did appeal to the adjudicator [tribunal], we have not
       been informed of the outcome.
       “As far as the size of parking signs is concerned – we believe
       this issue relates to a tiny number of signs located at
       residents-only parking zones, not to parking signs in general
       across the borough.
       “We are satisfied that the overwhelming number of signs across
       Bury are fully in accordance with national regulations, and any
       which are not will be rectified.”
       #Post#: 13472--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking sign emblem 6cm too small 
       By: DancingDad Date: January 8, 2024, 10:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Not sure that I have ever seen an article with so many errors!
       #Post#: 17812--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking sign emblem 6cm too small 
       By: The Rookie Date: March 20, 2024, 7:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Indeed, 'wins' is a bit premature and it's only the second word,
       it then goes from bad to worse.
       #Post#: 17872--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking sign emblem 6cm too small 
       By: ivanleo Date: March 20, 2024, 3:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=The Rookie link=topic=1063.msg17812#msg17812
       date=1710939229]
       Indeed, 'wins' is a bit premature and it's only the second word,
       it then goes from bad to worse.
       [/quote]
       Indeed, I've made an editorial complaint as the headline is
       basically clickbait.
       *****************************************************