DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 116633--------------------------------------------------
       Greenwich - St Johns Park, Vanbrugh Park - Code 52M - Failure to
       Comply with a Prohibition of certain types of vehicle
   DIR By: cesur
       Date: April 21, 2026, 5:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Got a PCN as we drove through a prohibited road at a restricted
       time (just 8 mins before it is free to drive!) in Greenwich.
       GSV:
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/dcjPmLzAuMcUXufm8
       Evidence and PCN pages:
  HTML https://photos.app.goo.gl/FAJ1fZZusoqisXj68
       Any opinion on this PCN?
       [member=24]Hippocrates[/member], do we have any confidence on
       "date of service of this notice" statement to contest?
       #Post#: 116658--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Greenwich - St Johns Park, Vanbrugh Park - Code 52M -
       Failure to Comply with a Prohibition of certain types of vehic
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: April 22, 2026, 4:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As per the rules for this forum, please post all sides of the
       PCN, only redacting name and address,
       #Post#: 116662--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Greenwich - St Johns Park, Vanbrugh Park - Code 52M -
       Failure to Comply with a Prohibition of certain types of vehic
   DIR By: cesur
       Date: April 22, 2026, 5:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
       >
       > As per the rules for this forum, please post all sides of the
       PCN, only redacting name and address,
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       All three pages of the PCN was added to the Google Photos Album
       shared as "Evidence" which should have read as Evidence and PCN
       pages maybe.
       #Post#: 116681--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Greenwich - St Johns Park, Vanbrugh Park - Code 52M -
       Failure to Comply with a Prohibition of certain types of vehic
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: April 22, 2026, 6:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: cesur link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Incandescent
       link=topic=10602.msg116658#msg116658 date=1776851995]
       > As per the rules for this forum, please post all sides of the
       PCN, only redacting name and address,
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       All three pages of the PCN was added to the Google Photos Album
       shared as "Evidence" which should have read as Evidence and PCN
       pages maybe.
       [/quote]
       Ah, sorry, missed that !  Video shows you driving with no
       hesitation past the sidn. Did you not see it or maybe didn't
       understand what it meant ?
       One possibly winning appeal argument is the statement of the
       contravention - "........prohibition of certain types of vehicle
       (motor vehicles)" I believe there was a win at London Tribunals
       because the specific vehicles prohibited are not shown. The
       "(motor vehicles)" being not sufficiently precise on the nature
       of the restriction. But of course you'd have to risk the full
       PCN penalty to get a ruling at London Tribunals.
       #Post#: 117196--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Greenwich - St Johns Park, Vanbrugh Park - Code 52M -
       Failure to Comply with a Prohibition of certain types of vehic
   DIR By: cesur
       Date: April 28, 2026, 4:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
       >
       > [quote author=cesur link=topic=10602.msg116662#msg116662
       date=1776852542]
       > [quote author=Incandescent
       link=topic=10602.msg116658#msg116658 date=1776851995]
       > As per the rules for this forum, please post all sides of the
       PCN, only redacting name and address,
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       All three pages of the PCN was added to the Google Photos Album
       shared as "Evidence" which should have read as Evidence and PCN
       pages maybe.
       [/quote]
       Ah, sorry, missed that !  Video shows you driving with no
       hesitation past the sidn. Did you not see it or maybe didn't
       understand what it meant ?
       One possibly winning appeal argument is the statement of the
       contravention - "........prohibition of certain types of vehicle
       (motor vehicles)" I believe there was a win at London Tribunals
       because the specific vehicles prohibited are not shown. The
       "(motor vehicles)" being not sufficiently precise on the nature
       of the restriction. But of course you'd have to risk the full
       PCN penalty to get a ruling at London Tribunals.
       [/quote]
       I think the driver may have thought they were within allowed
       times, or not aware of the restriction (sign didn't grab their
       attention).
       The sign shows a motorbike and a car.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1