DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 116567--------------------------------------------------
PPS Western Gateway
DIR By: sausage1971
Date: April 21, 2026, 9:16 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Received a tickets from PPS below
Appealed as per this forum
They have replied
Thoughts on how to proceed? Thanks
Rejection of Appeal
HTML https://ibb.co/sJFcr1sz
NTK
HTML https://ibb.co/bSsLJ4P
Appeal (Sent 10/4/26)
I am the keeper of the vehicle and I dispute your 'parking
charge'. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I
will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your
client landowner.
As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL
the requirements of PoFA 2012, you are unable to hold the keeper
of the vehicle liable for the charge. Partial or even
substantial compliance is not sufficient. There will be no
admission as to who was driving and no inference or assumptions
can be drawn. PPS has relied on contract law allegations of
breach against the driver only.
The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have
been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation
of the law of agency. Your NtK can only hold the driver liable.
PPS have no hope at POPLA, so you are urged to save us both a
complete waste of time and cancel the PCN.
I f you wish to continue to waste mine and your time by
rejecting this appeal I will require a POPLA code
Rejection of Appeal (21/4/26)
Dear Appellant,
Thank you for your correspondence.
As the registered keeper, you have declined to accept liability
for the charge and have failed to identify the driver at the
time of the parking event. Please be advised that, in accordance
with Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, where
the driver has not been named, liability for the parking charge
is lawfully transferred to the registered keeper, provided the
statutory requirements have been satisfied. As these
requirements have been met in this case, you are now liable for
the outstanding charge. We will therefore continue to pursue
recovery of the balance from you as the registered keeper.
Your appeal has been reviewed and investigated, and a decision
has now been made.
Please find attached the appeal decision letter for your
reference PCN 510816639.
On this occasion, the Parking Charge Notice has been issued
correctly, your appeal has been unsuccessful, and the charge
remains payable.
You have now reached the end of our internal appeals process,
and no further correspondence will be entered into regarding
this matter.
If you are not satisfied with the outcome of our investigation,
you may appeal to the independent appeals service, POPLA
(Parking on Private Land Appeals), using the verification code
provided in your appeal decision letter and by completing appeal
form online on
HTML http://www.popla.co.uk
within 28 days.
Please, see photographic evidence and further information
related to your parking ticket on our website: www.paypps.co.uk
#Post#: 116568--------------------------------------------------
Re: PPS Western Gateway
DIR By: jfollows
Date: April 21, 2026, 9:20 am
---------------------------------------------------------
They have provided a POPLA code, I can see it.
#Post#: 116569--------------------------------------------------
Re: PPS Western Gateway
DIR By: sausage1971
Date: April 21, 2026, 9:22 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Yes, my mistake, have amended my original post
#Post#: 116571--------------------------------------------------
Re: PPS Western Gateway
DIR By: jfollows
Date: April 21, 2026, 9:27 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Your POPLA appeal needs to amplify why PoFA 2012 has not been
complied with, I suggest by quoting the specific part(s) of the
legislation and in what way PPS has failed to comply with each
one.
#Post#: 116572--------------------------------------------------
Re: PPS Western Gateway
DIR By: sausage1971
Date: April 21, 2026, 9:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
ok, will do. I expect the POPLA appeal to fail and will probably
have to wait till the LoC but fingers crossed for POPLA
Think that there are other flaws with the NTK; observable time
period; wrong address, maybe others?
#Post#: 116573--------------------------------------------------
Re: PPS Western Gateway
DIR By: jfollows
Date: April 21, 2026, 9:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Include no “period of parking” because a single time is not a
period.
#Post#: 116574--------------------------------------------------
Re: PPS Western Gateway
DIR By: sausage1971
Date: April 21, 2026, 9:34 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks again, will do so
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1