URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 116420--------------------------------------------------
       Contravention 02 - Canham Rd, W3 - Parked on double yellow line
       with Blue Badge 
   DIR By: almep13
       Date: April 20, 2026, 7:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Dear Forum members,
       I hope you are well.
       The driver, a Blue Badge holder, parked on double yellow line in
       Canham Rd, W3 (Ealing borough) believing not to be any
       restrictions for loading/ unloading as there are no signposts or
       any kerb signs indicating such restrictions.
       Looking at the time indicated in the BB and pictures taken by
       the traffic warden, it seems that the warden had issued the PCN
       within very brief moment the car being parked (10:30am to
       10:31am).
       I include the following:
       PCN ref - AO09495858;
       VRN - LV68UTB;
       and the link below so that pictures taken by the warden can
       inform your views of potential appeal grounds.
  HTML https://ealing.tarantoportal.com/PCN
       My personal view is that Councils and their subcontractors issue
       such PCNs hoping and knowing that not many would appeal and even
       if those who appeal, some will be discouraged to continue
       appealing to the Tribunal by the threat of having to pay the
       full amount if their appeal is not upheld.
       Thank you for your invaluable views.
       Kind regards,
       Almep13
       #Post#: 116428--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Contravention 02 - Canham Rd, W3 - Parked on double yellow
       line with Blue Badge 
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: April 20, 2026, 8:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There are no obvious kerb blips prohibiting loading in their
       pics and for some reason there are pics of the BB badge and
       clock which are not relevant for an 02 contravention.
       No pic of a no loading sign too.
       I'd say no contravention.
       No blips clear at all on Maps view:
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/3zkZM9T62oUU4T9y5
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/Txr9Hb4w/Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-14-20-10.png
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/3m6JnBH1/Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-14-20-02.png
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/fGtXyjv8/Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-14-19-56.png
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/4ZtmdB6M/Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-14-19-48.png
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/dsLz2Gr5/Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-14-20-33.png
       #Post#: 116433--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Contravention 02 - Canham Rd, W3 - Parked on double yellow
       line with Blue Badge 
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: April 20, 2026, 8:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Kerb blips are there on GSV, but VERY worn.
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/2HVRgdXiQqxQWgfVA
       
       Is a sign needed for double-blips ?
       #Post#: 116467--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Contravention 02 - Canham Rd, W3 - Parked on double yellow
       line with Blue Badge 
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: April 20, 2026, 10:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Going back in time I can't see any freshly painted blips and it
       isn't obvious there has ever been no loading here.
       Traffic Signs manual says:
       As the double kerb mark has only one meaning, authorities may
       decide that adequate guidance is given without “No loading at
       any time” upright signs or with fewer such signs. However, this
       could lead to enforcement difficulties, particularly as marks of
       this type usually need frequent maintenance.
       Even if a sign was there this looks hopeless for Ealing.
       #Post#: 116491--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Contravention 02 - Canham Rd, W3 - Parked on double yellow
       line with Blue Badge 
   DIR By: almep13
       Date: April 20, 2026, 12:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good evening Stamfordman and Incandescent,
       That is my view too - no sign and no double blips to indicate
       contravention 02 for loading/ uploading in restricted area.
       Thank you for your views, I appreciate it.
       Kind regards,
       Almep13
       #Post#: 118192--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Contravention 02 - Canham Rd, W3 - Parked on double yellow
       line with Blue Badge 
   DIR By: almep13
       Date: May 9, 2026, 3:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good evening,
       I hope you are well.
       I challenged the PCN and they emailed yesterday with the
       decision to reject the appeal.
       I attach their response for your attention.
       They refer to yellow stripes and white "No loading" signs, but I
       can't see any of them from the pictures they have taken.
       Are there any other grounds I can use? What's your view of the
       chances of a successful appeal at London Tribunals?
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/rJWJ1SC#OuIvUI0
       Thank you in advance for your opinions.
       Thanks and regards,
       Almep13
       #Post#: 118212--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Contravention 02 - Canham Rd, W3 - Parked on double yellow
       line with Blue Badge 
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: May 10, 2026, 4:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Next stage is the notice to owner. I would wait for that and
       we'll help you make the representation.
       Is the logbook up to date with correct name and address.
       #Post#: 118274--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Contravention 02 - Canham Rd, W3 - Parked on double yellow
       line with Blue Badge 
   DIR By: almep13
       Date: May 10, 2026, 2:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good evening Stamfordman,
       thank you for the advice.
       Yes, logbook is updated with name and address, thanks.
       Kind regards,
       Almep13
       #Post#: 119794--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Contravention 02 - Canham Rd, W3 - Parked on double yellow
       line with Blue Badge 
   DIR By: almep13
       Date: May 26, 2026, 5:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good evening,
       I hope the hot weather is somehow bearable.
       I wrote an email to Ealing Parking Services questioning their
       decision and claim of double stripes on the kerb.
       They responded iterating the same claim. I attach the pictures
       of the latest response.
       I'm letting it pass by until they issue Notice to the Keeper.
       Thank you for your views and take care of yourselves.
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/yfns4Xo#8c0MJLL
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/yfns4Xo#Bit7Z0c
       Kind regards,
       Alemp13
       #Post#: 122498--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Contravention 02 - Canham Rd, W3 - Parked on double yellow
       line with Blue Badge 
   DIR By: almep13
       Date: June 20, 2026, 2:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good evening,
       I hope you are all well and enjoying the weather.
       I have just received this morning the Notice to Owner (NtO) as
       per links below.
       I believe the two grounds of appeal would be: i) no
       contravention occurred (no restrictions in place and BB permit
       displayed); and ii) procedural impropriety (Council shouldn't
       have issued a PCN and continue to pursue payment as point (i)
       did not occur.
       Is there any other points / impropriety that you can spot from
       the NtO attached?
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/0Uihp76#ucZwAtN
       (page 1)
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/0Uihp76#plDCcn1
       (page 2)
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/0Uihp76#sxYEatU
       (page 3)
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/0Uihp76#XRUVt8y
       (page 4)
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/0Uihp76#sCLiBlQ
       (page 5)
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/0Uihp76#GhEOVxi
       (page 6)
       Thank you in advance for your views.
       Kind regards,
       Almep13
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 3
   DIR Next Page