DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 116014--------------------------------------------------
Alliance Parking PCN – No Parking / 16 Min ANPR Stay – Incorrect
Operator Evidence? – Sea View Car Park, PL27 6SR
DIR By: tgwhiz1
Date: April 15, 2026, 2:24 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi all,
I’m the registered keeper and have received a postal Notice to
Keeper from Alliance Parking for Sea View Car Park, PL27 6SR.The
vehicle did not park. On arrival, the driver was unable to find
a parking space due to the car park being gridlocked. The
vehicle remained in circulation while attempting to locate a
space, then exited when it became clear parking was not
possible.
I appealed as registered keeper (without naming the driver)
saying: no parking took place, the driver was unable to park,
the 16 minutes was spent circulating / attempting to leave
safely, two separate timestamped ANPR images does not prove
parking. Alliance rejected the appeal with a template-style
response saying: signage was clear, payment was required on
arrival, by remaining beyond a few minutes the driver accepted
the contract, no payment was made.They didn’t really address the
point that no parking event occurred.
Also, the payment search evidence they’ve provided on page 3
appears to be for the wrong date range (showing payment checks
between 02/04 and 02/04, rather than the alleged event date of
04/04). That makes me question whether they have properly
reviewed the evidence for this case at all.
Main questions:
Is this worth taking to IAS?
How strong is the “no parking / no contract formed” argument on
these facts?
Does the apparent wrong-date payment evidence help?
Any other points worth raising (signage / grace / consideration
period / POFA wording)?
Thank you very much in advance. I've attached front and back of
NTK and appeal rejection here:
HTML https://ibb.co/wNRw8jQv
HTML https://ibb.co/wNRw8jQv
HTML https://ibb.co/hJVLQwzt
HTML https://ibb.co/hJVLQwzt
HTML https://ibb.co/6R2S54Mm
HTML https://ibb.co/6R2S54Mm
HTML https://ibb.co/7cm9N9H
HTML https://ibb.co/7cm9N9H
HTML https://ibb.co/0yf4JFyh
HTML https://ibb.co/0yf4JFyh
#Post#: 116036--------------------------------------------------
Re: Alliance Parking PCN – No Parking / 16 Min ANPR Stay –
Incorrect Operator Evidence? – Sea View Car Park, PL27 6SR
DIR By: jfollows
Date: April 16, 2026, 3:35 am
---------------------------------------------------------
See
HTML http://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2014/03/waiting-for-space-is-not-parking.html
Personally, I would appeal on this single point, referring to
the words in the judgement, and that you didn’t and couldn’t
park, so you won’t be paying them. The useless IAS will get more
confused if you make multiple appeal points and ignore any of
them it doesn’t like. Even if they reject you have a defence to
any subsequent claim.
HTML https://www.ssrichardmontgomery.com/download/Parking%20Eye%20Ltd%20Case%20No%203JD08399%20judgement.pdf
#Post#: 116094--------------------------------------------------
Re: Alliance Parking PCN – No Parking / 16 Min ANPR Stay –
Incorrect Operator Evidence? – Sea View Car Park, PL27 6SR
DIR By: Sander333
Date: April 16, 2026, 1:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
IAS are the remnants of a Kangaroo court very little chance you
will have a positive result.
The driver of a vehicle which I am the RK had a similar PCN from
NCP for 11 minutes appealed to them as circumstances are
identical to yours they decided not to pursue.
If you appeal and lose probable outcome await for your day in
court if need be.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1