DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 113940--------------------------------------------------
Edinburgh Council – pavement parking (TSA 2019) – Fyfe Lane
DIR By: stevenmorton123
Date: March 21, 2026, 8:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi all,
I’ve received two PCNs from Edinburgh Council for alleged
pavement parking under the Transport (Scotland) Act 2019.
PCNs: ED4589369A and ED45893849
VRM: EA17EFX
Dates: 19/02/2026 and 20/02/2026
Location: Fyfe Lane, Edinburgh
I challenged informally but both were rejected. I’m now deciding
whether to take this to the tribunal and would appreciate
advice.
Background / layout
This is a new-build residential development with a
shared-surface courtyard layout.
- The surface is level throughout – no kerb between the
carriageway and where I parked
- The only distinction is a change in paving colour with a flush
stone strip
- Parking bays are inconsistently marked (some marked, some not)
- Vehicles routinely straddle both surfaces
- There is a clearly defined raised pedestrian area next to the
building, with a proper kerb
The road does not appear on the council’s adopted roads list
(though I understand they can still enforce).
Council rejection
The council rejected my challenge and stated:
“the kerb stone is clearly apparent”
However, from their own photos (and mine), the only actual kerb
appears to be behind the vehicle next to the building, not
between the vehicle and the carriageway.
My argument
I am relying on ground (a): the alleged contravention did not
occur
- The area appears to be a shared surface, not a clearly defined
footway
- There is no kerb or vertical separation between the vehicle
and the carriageway
- The council has not identified where the footway begins
- The only distinction is paving colour, which seems
insufficient to define a footway
Questions
- Does this type of shared-surface layout get accepted as a
footway in Scotland?
- How important is the absence of a kerb in tribunal decisions?
- Is it worth pushing this to adjudication?
- Anything specific I should include in formal representations?
I have uploaded:
- PCNs and council correspondence
- Council photos
- My own photos showing the layout where other cars have parked
similarly
Google Drive link -
HTML https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-55lcgLHPtc3r9lx7CXbzpJS6Pofr8c3?usp=sharing
HTML https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-55lcgLHPtc3r9lx7CXbzpJS6Pofr8c3?usp=sharing
Google Street View:
Link -
HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/PDamxmWuXKcUpcdZ7
HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/PDamxmWuXKcUpcdZ7
Thanks in advance for any help.
#Post#: 113941--------------------------------------------------
Re: Edinburgh Council – pavement parking (TSA 2019) – Fyfe Lane
DIR By: John U.K.
Date: March 21, 2026, 8:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
direct GSV link
HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/DS2bYCoHD4o3HJaSA
Please also post all sides of the PCN and a copy of what you
wrote to the council.
#Post#: 113946--------------------------------------------------
Re: Edinburgh Council – pavement parking (TSA 2019) – Fyfe Lane
DIR By: stevenmorton123
Date: March 21, 2026, 8:34 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Sure, I have updated Google Drive with PCN's and the original
Appeal + Appeal evidence PDF.
#Post#: 113972--------------------------------------------------
Re: Edinburgh Council – pavement parking (TSA 2019) – Fyfe Lane
DIR By: Daim456
Date: March 21, 2026, 6:09 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
You cannot Appeal to the Tribunal because you have not recieve
Notice of Rejection against Notice to Owner.
Edinburgh City Council has not responsed to you about whether
the road is adopted by Council.
One is to require whether this road is adopted under
Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004.
I can require to the Council however I would be bit busy over
few days but anyone can require it.
I may have to look at the legislation the interpretation of a
pavement.
If you make a formal representation against Notice to Owner
asking about adopted road and the Council fails to response, you
have a good case in Tribunal for failing to consider your
representation.
In the meantime if you want to carry on you would have to wait
for the Notice to Owner in the post to registered keeper that is
stated on the V5C form.
Ensure your V5C has the correct address to recieve the Notice to
Owner.
#Post#: 114637--------------------------------------------------
Re: Edinburgh Council – pavement parking (TSA 2019) – Fyfe Lane
DIR By: stevenmorton123
Date: March 27, 2026, 11:51 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the advice.
The Notice to Owner has now been received, so I will be making
formal representations.
I will proceed on the basis that the alleged contravention did
not occur, as the location appears to be a shared surface with
no clear kerb or physical delineation of a footway.
I will also ask the council to identify precisely where the
carriageway ends and the footway begins, and whether there are
any layout plans or design documents supporting this.
Separately, I will submit an Environmental Information request
to establish whether the road is adopted and to obtain any
available layout drawings.
I’ll upload the NtO and full set of photos shortly.
Any further suggestions before I submit formal reps would be
appreciated.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1