URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 113736--------------------------------------------------
       PCN Lambeth - 53 j - failing to comply with restriction zone
       By: ihateinjustice24 Date: March 19, 2026, 10:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi, I’m looking for some advice on multiple PCNs I’ve received
       from Lambeth for entering a pedestrian/school street zone on
       Sunnyhill Road.
       I’ve recently received my first PCN (reduced to £80), but it was
       issued around 10–11 days after the contravention date. During
       that time, I continued to drive through the same road daily to
       get to work, completely unaware of the restriction.
       I now realise this is a timed school street restriction, but the
       signage is positioned right at the turn, so I didn’t notice it
       at the time. I am also not from the local area.
       Because the first PCN arrived late, I have unknowingly committed
       the same contravention multiple times before I had any
       opportunity to change my behaviour.
       I’m concerned I could now receive multiple PCNs for the same
       mistake, potentially amounting to a large total I cannot afford.
       My questions are:
       * Can I argue “continuous contravention” or that multiple PCNs
       are disproportionate since I wasn’t aware of the restriction
       before receiving the first notice?
       * Has anyone had success getting additional PCNs cancelled in
       similar circumstances?
       For context, I have now stopped using the road during restricted
       hours as soon as I became aware.
       Any advice would be really appreciated.
       #Post#: 113740--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Lambeth - 53 j - failing to comply with restriction zone
       By: Hippocrates Date: March 19, 2026, 11:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Please show us the PCN and VRM details and screenshot the
       website re all payments and dates periods as shown for starters.
       #Post#: 113770--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Lambeth - 53 j - failing to comply with restriction zone
       By: ihateinjustice24 Date: March 19, 2026, 4:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Here's a link to the details and screenshot:
  HTML https://postimg.cc/gallery/6NMNFV1
       #Post#: 113777--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Lambeth - 53 j - failing to comply with restriction zone
       By: Hippocrates Date: March 19, 2026, 6:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Screenshot is missing the vital information: the price, the date
       of increase and your proof of date of the shot.
       We win cases because of this.
       #Post#: 113782--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Lambeth - 53 j - failing to comply with restriction zone
       By: ihateinjustice24 Date: March 19, 2026, 6:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       apologies, updated link includes the price and discounted price
       as well as proof of screen shot time in the top right
       :
  HTML https://postimg.cc/gallery/6NMNFV1
       #Post#: 113880--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Lambeth - 53 j - failing to comply with restriction zone
       By: Hippocrates Date: March 20, 2026, 2:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There is  no need and no help to us in obscuring the VRM and PCN
       details.
       #Post#: 113923--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Lambeth - 53 j - failing to comply with restriction zone
       By: ihateinjustice24 Date: March 21, 2026, 6:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       third times a charm:
  HTML https://postimg.cc/gallery/DJZ1nM5
       #Post#: 113924--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Lambeth - 53 j - failing to comply with restriction zone
       By: ihateinjustice24 Date: March 21, 2026, 6:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Update 4 more pcn's have arrived as suspected, same road, so
       £400 total now.
       Hoping i can argue continuous contravention.
       #Post#: 114043--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Lambeth - 53 j - failing to comply with restriction zone
       By: ihateinjustice24 Date: March 22, 2026, 4:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       any advice ?
       #Post#: 114045--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Lambeth - 53 j - failing to comply with restriction zone
       By: fraser.mitchell Date: March 22, 2026, 5:31 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes. You wrote this in your initial post:-
       [quote]* Can I argue “continuous contravention” or that multiple
       PCNs are disproportionate since I wasn’t aware of the
       restriction before receiving the first notice?
       * Has anyone had success getting additional PCNs cancelled in
       similar circumstances?[/quote]
       YOu cannot argue "continuous contravention"; that applies to
       parking where a car remains at the same spot for several days
       and gets several PCNs, but even then this argument can sometimes
       fail to succeed. What you can argue is that until the first PCN
       arrived by post, you were unaware of committing the
       contraventions. So you could argue that {CNs dated between the
       date of the first PCN, and the date it arrived are
       disproportionate, and unfair. SOme councils will agree to cancel
       such PCNs on the basis you pay the first one. Others, being
       venal and rapacious, insist all be paid. Then if you take the
       matter to London Tribunals, success is not guaranteed either,
       and this time it is with the full PCN penalties in play.
       So to handle this as a representation, you need to group them
       together into a single representation, and request the PCNs
       between the date of the first and the date the first one
       arrived, be cancelled.
       *****************************************************