URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 113652--------------------------------------------------
       Bridgepam PCN obvious short stop + PofA non-compliance, need
       POPLA appeal draft
   DIR By: 8vaibhav
       Date: March 18, 2026, 4:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello helpful people,
       I as keeper of the said vehicle recieved the following PCN from
       Bridgepam by post:
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/SwXCmnGD/Bridgepam-PCN.jpg
       Thereafter, I appealed as the keeper with the following text:
       --- Quote ---
       >
       > I am the keeper of the vehicle and I dispute your 'parking
       charge'. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I
       will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your
       client landowner.
       > The photos you have shared span over a duration of less than 2
       minutes and visibly show that the vehicle's hazard lights
       flashing indicating it was a mere stop rather than parking. Less
       than 2 minutes is too less for the driver to be assumed to have
       agreed to the contractual terms displayed near by.
       > As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL
       the requirements of PoFA 2012, you are unable to hold the keeper
       of the vehicle liable for the charge.
       > Besides other shortfalls, as an example, your NTK fails to
       "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the
       driver and a current address for service for the driver" so it
       is not complaint with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012,
       schedule 4, paragraph 9, clause 2(e).
       > Partial or even substantial compliance is not sufficient.
       There will be no admission as to who was driving and no
       inference or assumptions can be drawn. BridgePam has relied on
       contract law allegations of breach against the driver only.
       > The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have
       been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation
       of the law of agency. Your NtK can only hold the driver liable.
       You have no hope should you be so stupid as to try and litigate,
       so you are urged to save us both a complete waste of time and
       cancel the PCN.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       They first sent me an email asking me to confirm the identity of
       the driver and following my refusal along above lines have
       reject my appeal as per below letter:
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/kVCsHHdM/Bridgepam-rejection-1st-page.jpg
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/gMFX3wsN/Bridgepam-rejection-2nd-page.jpg
       Venue signage:
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/7xZkLhNC/Bridgepam-Signage.jpg
       Now I need to appeal this on POPLA, which likely gets rejected
       but I need some help in selecting correct option on the website
       (it is allowing to select multiple options and then it's trying
       to trick me to select sentences starting with "I.. " to imply
       driver identity possibly.
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/PGgDQYRD/POPLA-option-1.jpg
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/JWnCShNX/POPLA-option-2.jpg
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/qMCwk3hd/POPLA-Step-2.jpg
       Please advise what options I should select here and what text I
       should use in my draft appeal to POPLA. Many thanks in advance
       as always
       #Post#: 113675--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Bridgepam PCN obvious short stop + PofA non-compliance, need
       POPLA appeal draft
   DIR By: InterCity125
       Date: March 19, 2026, 2:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There are a number of PoFA non compliance issues with the NtK.
       As you say, 9(2)(e) is missing.
       9(2)(f) is also altered in parts and some sections are omitted.
       #Post#: 113872--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Bridgepam PCN obvious short stop + PofA non-compliance, need
       POPLA appeal draft
   DIR By: 8vaibhav
       Date: March 20, 2026, 1:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       is it safe to select "other" as the answer for both these?
       I will add reference to 9(2)(f) as advised, anything else to add
       or a draft appeal would be very useful.
       Thanks always
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1