DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 117480--------------------------------------------------
Re: One Parking Solutions - NtK - returning within no return
period / overstaying
DIR By: cferg
Date: May 1, 2026, 12:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Shameless selfbump, but please could someone have a look and
advise if my appeal is adequate? :)
#Post#: 117490--------------------------------------------------
Re: One Parking Solutions - ticket for returning within no
return period
DIR By: DWMB2
Date: May 1, 2026, 3:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
That should be fine for an initial appeal. At risk of sounding
defeatist they're unlikely to accept whatever you submit, but
that at least demonstrates you're prepared to put up a fight.
#Post#: 117595--------------------------------------------------
Re: One Parking Solutions - ticket for returning within no
return period
DIR By: cferg
Date: May 2, 2026, 2:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks mate, have submitted the appeal - fingers crossed!
#Post#: 118461--------------------------------------------------
Re: One Parking Solutions - ticket for returning within no
return period
DIR By: cferg
Date: May 12, 2026, 12:49 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi all,
I've had a response from the company re my appeal
'We are currently considering your appeal. The address you have
supplied does not match the address
supplied by the DVLA.
Please provide proof of the correct address by post or email to:
info@oneparking.co.uk by 19th May 2026
referencing your parking charge number.
Please note, if you do not confirm your address by the date
stated in this letter, your appeal will not be
considered, and the parking charge may continue to progress,
which may incur additional costs.
Yours Sincerely,
One Parking Solution Ltd'
I'm a bit lost here - for context i'm currently living with my
partner whom i only recently moved in with. Previously i was
living with family. My V5 is registered to the family address
which i visit weekly. The NTK i received was to my partners
address (i raised this previously, as confused as to how they
have obtained this address). When submitting the appeal, i have
provided the same address (my partners) as the NtK they sent to
me.
I also note, that the address header provided on this response
to my appeal is a combination of my family + partners address
(i've read it via e-mail) - so an address that does not exist.
I've tried to view my appeal on their website to make sure i
provided the correct address, but unable to.
Are they able to reject an appeal on the basis that the address
doesn't match what they have? Even though i'm responding to
their correspondence?
I going to submit a SAR so i can confirm the details i submitted
+ their sources, but unsure if it'd be actioned in time for the
deadline they've provided...
Any advice on how to proceed would be appreciated :)
#Post#: 118486--------------------------------------------------
Re: One Parking Solutions - ticket for returning within no
return period
DIR By: Sander333
Date: May 12, 2026, 3:52 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The address does not really matter what is the crux of the
matter is was there a breach of the conditions of parking.You
can explain this to them but under no circumstances disclose who
the driver(s) were.
#Post#: 118519--------------------------------------------------
Re: One Parking Solutions - ticket for returning within no
return period
DIR By: cferg
Date: May 13, 2026, 4:24 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks, will respond :)
#Post#: 119282--------------------------------------------------
Re: One Parking Solutions - ticket for returning within no
return period
DIR By: cferg
Date: May 20, 2026, 4:35 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi all, unsurprisingly they have rejected my appeal and
shockingly the appeal response did not address any points raised
- such as no evidence of who was driving, the fact that the
vehicle had been moved between the timestamped images indicating
the vehicle had been moved and reparked, and POFA issues
regarding a single period of parking.
I'll be appealing to the IAS but understand they are not
consumer friendly. Would someone mind reading the appeal and
making sure it's adequate?
"I am the registered keeper of the vehicle and I appeal against
the Parking Charge Notice issued by One Parking Solutions.
The operator has failed to establish that any contravention
occurred and has failed to demonstrate compliance with Schedule
4 of PoFA - specifically:
No evidence of a single period of parking
The operator relies solely upon timestamped photographs taken on
separate dates 24 hours apart (07:10 14 March 2026 and 07:50 15
March 2026).
Paragraph 8(2)(a) of Schedule 4 requires that a Notice to
Keeper:
“specify… the period of parking to which the notice relates”.
The operator has failed to identify any continuous or defined
period of parking. Two isolated timestamps approximately 24
hours apart do not establish a single parking period.
The operator’s own images also show the vehicle positioned
differently within the bay on each date, indicating that the
vehicle had been moved and later reparked rather than remaining
parked continuously.
No evidence has been produced demonstrating:
continuous presence,
a continuous parking event,
or the duration of any alleged stay.
Accordingly, the operator has failed to satisfy the statutory
requirements necessary to establish keeper liability.
Ambiguous and contradictory contravention
The operator alleges:
“Exceeded maximum stay and/or returned within no return time”.
This wording is ambiguous and contradictory. It is unclear
whether the operator alleges:
a single continuous overstay, or
two separate parking events involving a prohibited return.
These are materially different allegations requiring different
evidence.
The operator has failed to establish which alleged contravention
actually occurred.
No evidence of the same driver
The operator has not identified the driver.
A “no return” restriction can only logically apply where the
same driver returns within the prohibited period. The operator
has provided no evidence demonstrating this.
Instead, the operator merely assumes liability based upon the
vehicle registration alone.
Failure to properly consider the appeal
In my original appeal I specifically raised:
the lack of a single defined parking period,
the differing vehicle positioning,
the lack of evidence of continuous parking,
and the Schedule 4 requirements.
The operator’s rejection failed to properly address these points
and instead relied upon generic template wording asserting that
a contravention occurred without evidential explanation.
The rejection provides no explanation as to:
how a continuous parking period was established,
how Schedule 4 Paragraph 8(2)(a) was satisfied,
or how the alleged contravention was determined from two
isolated timestamps.
Administrative and data accuracy concerns
The operator has repeatedly issued correspondence to an address
which is an amalgamation of two separate addresses and does not
exist.
While not the primary ground of appeal, this raises concerns
regarding the accuracy and reliability of the operator’s records
and handling of personal data.
Conclusion
The operator has failed to:
establish a single period of parking,
prove continuous presence,
clearly identify the alleged contravention,
demonstrate compliance with Schedule 4 of the Protection of
Freedoms Act 2012,
or provide evidence sufficient to establish keeper liability.
I respectfully request that the appeal is allowed and the
Parking Charge Notice is cancelled."
Thanks again for advice provided so far.
#Post#: 119284--------------------------------------------------
Re: One Parking Solutions - ticket for returning within no
return period
DIR By: jfollows
Date: May 20, 2026, 4:45 am
---------------------------------------------------------
In my opinion, if you give these people multiple appeal reasons
they simply ignore the difficult ones and respond only to the
easy ones.
The IAS is the same.
I would personally make a strong single point appeal, and keep
the other points for when they reject anyway and you have to
file a defence, because a court won’t ignore the points it
doesn’t find convenient.
#Post#: 119307--------------------------------------------------
Re: One Parking Solutions - ticket for returning within no
return period
DIR By: cferg
Date: May 20, 2026, 8:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks, i'll keep it to the point.
Just so i'm prepared if they do file court action, would i need
to seek representation from a solicitor? If so, are there any
out there that specialise in these sorts of cases?
#Post#: 119313--------------------------------------------------
Re: One Parking Solutions - ticket for returning within no
return period
DIR By: jfollows
Date: May 20, 2026, 9:00 am
---------------------------------------------------------
No.
The Small Claims track is specifically designed for people to
defend themselves at low cost, and depending on who represents
the claimant it’s quite possible they will discontinue before
having to pay the fee and therefore going to court anyway.
*****************************************************
Page 3 of 4
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page