URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 13733--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - Stopped in Taxi Rank - George Lane
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: January 13, 2024, 2:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: flash2005 link ---
       >
       > Please see the draft appeal here (link below) which combines
       the strategy from both [member=1]cp8759[/member] and
       [member=7]mrmustard[/member].  Kindly let me know any feedback.
       Commenting privileges are enabled in the document.
       >
       > Appeal Draft
  HTML https://docs.google.com/document/d/11O5TkJLfha7VC6VpjR1KLR0nCCI_qU-hR0RxyU7xVoE/edit?usp=sharing
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Needs to be tidied up. But the basic points are there.
       #Post#: 13776--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - Stopped in Taxi Rank - George Lane
   DIR By: flash2005
       Date: January 15, 2024, 4:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > [quote author=flash2005 link=topic=1020.msg13723#msg13723
       date=1705172663]
       > Please see the draft appeal here (link below) which combines
       the strategy from both [member=1]cp8759[/member] and
       [member=7]mrmustard[/member].  Kindly let me know any feedback.
       Commenting privileges are enabled in the document.
       >
       > Appeal Draft
  HTML https://docs.google.com/document/d/11O5TkJLfha7VC6VpjR1KLR0nCCI_qU-hR0RxyU7xVoE/edit?usp=sharing
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Needs to be tidied up. But the basic points are there.
       [/quote]
       Many thanks.
       Can you suggest what tidying up is required, as I have tried to
       do the best possible draft.  If you need edit access please
       click on the button in google docs.
       #Post#: 13803--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - Stopped in Taxi Rank - George Lane
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: January 15, 2024, 11:10 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I would not deploy the link tactic at this stage: it's warning
       them that they have a problem and they can fix it by opening the
       link. A failure to consider at the informal stage has very
       little weight, you really need them to fail to open the link now
       when they consider your challenge to the notice to owner. You
       would then deploy the click statistics at the tribunal stage,
       when it's too late for the council to go back and remedy their
       error.
       On the second ground (date of service vs date of contravention),
       there are these three cases you can cite:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RJouvEIzKoxr0VLtZ6EnMSiquc3Y9QMT/view
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qjkKYJxAHhFvrWhpwTqGwhrUfa-pD5Sv/view
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HLgXkoFeKSPDT1k09A_jPyaybFvP98ac/view
       I would quote them by only giving the names of the parties, to
       Richard Weisz v London Borough of Barnet, Malcolm Newman v
       London Borough of Hounslow and Branislav Baca v Portsmouth City
       Council, that way they're far less likely to claim they looked
       them up in the register (and the last one can't be looked up
       anyway).
       You then have multiple links and to prove they've considered the
       representations as required by law they would have to open all
       four, which they're unlikely to do.
       I've also added a few comments to the google doc.
       #Post#: 13805--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - Stopped in Taxi Rank - George Lane
   DIR By: flash2005
       Date: January 15, 2024, 11:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
       >
       > I would not deploy the link tactic at this stage: it's warning
       them that they have a problem and they can fix it by opening the
       link. A failure to consider at the informal stage has very
       little weight, you really need them to fail to open the link now
       when they consider your challenge to the notice to owner. You
       would then deploy the click statistics at the tribunal stage,
       when it's too late for the council to go back and remedy their
       error.
       >
       > On the second ground (date of service vs date of
       contravention), there are these three cases you can cite:
       >
       >
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RJouvEIzKoxr0VLtZ6EnMSiquc3Y9QMT/view
       >
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qjkKYJxAHhFvrWhpwTqGwhrUfa-pD5Sv/view
       >
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HLgXkoFeKSPDT1k09A_jPyaybFvP98ac/view
       >
       > I would quote them by only giving the names of the parties, to
       Richard Weisz v London Borough of Barnet, Malcolm Newman v
       London Borough of Hounslow and Branislav Baca v Portsmouth City
       Council, that way they're far less likely to claim they looked
       them up in the register (and the last one can't be looked up
       anyway).
       >
       > You then have multiple links and to prove they've considered
       the representations as required by law they would have to open
       all four, which they're unlikely to do.
       >
       > I've also added a few comments to the google doc.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I have made the suggested changes in the document.  Please let
       me know if there is any further feedback.  I haven't added the
       final links yet to reduce the risk of accidental clicks.
       #Post#: 13926--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - Stopped in Taxi Rank - George Lane
   DIR By: flash2005
       Date: January 18, 2024, 2:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Should I submit the appeal now ?
       #Post#: 14003--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - Stopped in Taxi Rank - George Lane
   DIR By: flash2005
       Date: January 19, 2024, 9:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=1]cp8759[/member] - There is still time available for
       the appeal, but I wanted to check if there is any further
       feedback ?
       #Post#: 14005--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - Stopped in Taxi Rank - George Lane
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: January 19, 2024, 9:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I've added one final comment, also please note this is a formal
       representation, not an appeal.
       #Post#: 14031--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - Stopped in Taxi Rank - George Lane
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: January 19, 2024, 4:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There are good vibes.  :)
       #Post#: 14065--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - Stopped in Taxi Rank - George Lane
   DIR By: flash2005
       Date: January 20, 2024, 10:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
       >
       > I've added one final comment, also please note this is a
       formal representation, not an appeal.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Many thanks, I have changed the word appeal to formal
       representation in the document and also submitted it to the
       council now.
       I have removed sharing on the draft document so that there is no
       risk of anybody clicking the short.io links by mistake.
       #Post#: 14406--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - Stopped in Taxi Rank - George Lane
   DIR By: flash2005
       Date: January 27, 2024, 9:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The council has rejected the formal representation.  No links
       have been clicked either from the first appeal or the second
       representation. Please see below
       Can I get advice on the next steps please ?
       [member=24]Hippocrates[/member], [member=1]cp8759[/member],
       [member=7]mrmustard[/member]
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/ypAY8Ms.png
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/jRt0rDZ.png
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/BIMJJrU.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/AAZgdFC.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/wwKqGM1.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/pBz88cv.jpeg
       *****************************************************
       Page 4 of 5
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page