URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 112850--------------------------------------------------
       PCN from Bellevue Car Park in Greenwich - Appeal dismissed for
       unpaid parking
   DIR By: josephalabi
       Date: March 11, 2026, 10:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello,
       I was parking in a car park and when I went to pay the
       contactless and card option was not working. I did not have
       minutes to call to pay and did not have coins. I have a blue
       bade which I used on the windshield. I received a PCN and I
       challenged this explaining and offered to pay the sum that would
       have been owed for parking. They declined and I referred the
       matter to POPLA who are the ombudsman for parking on private
       land appeals apparently, they also ruled in my favour and now I
       am being asked to pay £170.
       I was in the car park for 27 minutes or so and the charge would
       have been something like £3.
       I feel this is unfair as I did attempt to pay - video proof
       which I do have and both the company and the ombudsman did not
       allow me to submit during the process of me challenging this PCN
       and also did not take into account I have a blue badge.
       I have now received a letter before action and have been given
       30 days to pay or respond.
       The options are limited regarding the debt which says I either
       A - Agree I owe the debt
       B - I owe some of the debt, but not all of it
       C - I dont know wether I owe the debt
       D - I dispute the debt
       I am not sure if I should tick B or D. If B, do I just keep the
       amount I would have paid if the machine was working if D what
       reason do I put.
       I have uploaded the Letter before action, ombudsman decision and
       proof of the machine not working here:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1YWGgyJjRr5DgFAvYA38EnRVmLsUdnYHl?usp=sharing
       Would appreciate help here. Thank you in advance
       [img width=600]
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/deWqx2fEopWQBv8X7[/img]
       #Post#: 112852--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN from Bellevue Car Park in Greenwich - Appeal dismissed
       for unpaid parking
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: March 11, 2026, 10:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You are under no obligation or requirement to use their silly
       forms.
       If you dispute the claimed debt, you simply write to them in
       response to say so.
       In the short term, it won’t make any difference. But at least
       you will have been seen to engage with them.
       #Post#: 112857--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN from Bellevue Car Park in Greenwich - Appeal dismissed
       for unpaid parking
   DIR By: InterCity125
       Date: March 11, 2026, 10:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Please post up the PCN for examination before taking any further
       action.
       Are we to assume that the driver has been revealed?
       #Post#: 112873--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN from Bellevue Car Park in Greenwich - Appeal dismissed
       for unpaid parking
   DIR By: Dave65
       Date: March 11, 2026, 12:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       they also ruled in "my favour" and now I am being asked to pay
       £170.
       is this correct?
       #Post#: 112881--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN from Bellevue Car Park in Greenwich - Appeal dismissed
       for unpaid parking
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: March 11, 2026, 12:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Dave65 link ---
       >
       > they also ruled in "my favour" and now I am being asked to pay
       £170.
       > is this correct?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Who ruled in whatever way?
       Please post whatever you’re referring to, as requested above.
       If POPLA, then it’s not binding on you in any way.
       #Post#: 112976--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN from Bellevue Car Park in Greenwich - Appeal dismissed
       for unpaid parking
   DIR By: josephalabi
       Date: March 12, 2026, 7:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Dave65 link ---
       >
       > they also ruled in "my favour" and now I am being asked to pay
       £170.
       > is this correct?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Sorry, I didnt mean in my favour, they ruled against me. their
       decision is in the Gdrive
       #Post#: 112977--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN from Bellevue Car Park in Greenwich - Appeal dismissed
       for unpaid parking
   DIR By: josephalabi
       Date: March 12, 2026, 7:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: InterCity125 link ---
       >
       > Please post up the PCN for examination before taking any
       further action.
       >
       > Are we to assume that the driver has been revealed?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I don't have the PCN specifically, what I do have is the letter
       before action in the google drive link.
       I remember when it happened, they just sent a letter rather than
       affix anything specific to the vehicle etc
       #Post#: 113007--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN from Bellevue Car Park in Greenwich - Appeal dismissed
       for unpaid parking
   DIR By: InterCity125
       Date: March 12, 2026, 10:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Once again, was the driver revealed in any of the appeals?
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1