DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 111820--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ealing, PCN 32JD Failing to proceed in direction shown,
Greenford Road / The Broadway / Ruislip Road
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: March 2, 2026, 5:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
To be frank, I don't think your father has a strong case for an
adjudication at London Tribunals or even any case. Nobody has
posted so far to suggest one.
If it brings closure, then pay the discount, by all means. Note
that the council will re-offer it when rejecting his reps. so
nothing lost. Any reps based on mitigation are almost certain to
be rejected, and I see no case base on the traffic signs at the
location. One just has to be very careful when driving around
London, because such are the huge sums now being accrued from
PCN penalties, one has to wonder why central government hasn't
stepped in to stop this ruthless, venal, and rapacious racket.
PCN revenues in London based on over 9.5 million PCNs per annum
, if all paid at the discounted rate, gives a revenue of over
£750 million pounds. (Evidence from Mr Mustard, one of our
regulars on here).
#Post#: 111822--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ealing, PCN 32JD Failing to proceed in direction shown,
Greenford Road / The Broadway / Ruislip Road
DIR By: aproley
Date: March 2, 2026, 6:01 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Thank you Incandescent. I appreciate your candidness. I will go
ahead with the representation in any case and see if get
anywhere with it.
If possible, could you confirm if I should make a representation
similar to one drafted by [member=1]cp8759[/member] in link
below? If yes, any idea what those links are supposed to be?
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/ealing-council-greenford-road-code-32jd-fail-proceed-in-direction-shown-by-arrow/msg22647/#msg22647
#Post#: 111824--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ealing, PCN 32JD Failing to proceed in direction shown,
Greenford Road / The Broadway / Ruislip Road
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: March 2, 2026, 7:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Yes, that appeal text looks as it it could win, but that
particular one didn't. Whilst winning adjudications can be
quoted in reps, an adjudication is not a ruling that applies to
all similar cases subsequently. We have seen, over the years,
adjudicators actually failing to follow their own previous
adjudication on identical cases ! They don't have to justify
anything at all, except at a judicial review, if the aggrieved
appellant can afford it, and almost nobody can.
#Post#: 115691--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ealing, PCN 32JD Failing to proceed in direction shown,
Greenford Road / The Broadway / Ruislip Road
DIR By: John_S
Date: April 13, 2026, 5:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi all, sorry I’ve come to this post late - but I’ve just been
referred here by a friend as I’m dealing with a similar case at
the same location.
Am I missing something? I thought that Diagram 606 signs (white
arrow on blue background) whether or not incorporated into ATS,
require a traffic order. Surely, without a traffic order,
there’s no contravention?
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 2
DIR Previous Page