URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 113648--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus PCN, Claim form received DCBLegal - Forestry Engl
       and land
       By: Jameuy Date: March 18, 2026, 3:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Should I submit the above defence to MCOL?
       Thank you
       #Post#: 113661--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus PCN, Claim form received DCBLegal - Forestry Engl
       and land
       By: DWMB2 Date: March 18, 2026, 6:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You could probably tighten up the wording.
       [quote]The Claimant alleges that a parking charge became payable
       following the parking of the vehicle at a location within the
       Forest of Bere near Wickham, namely the West Walk Car
       Park.[/quote]
       No need to repeat the claimant's claim for them.
       [quote]Land managed by the Forestry Commission may be subject to
       the Forestry Commission Byelaws 1982, which were made pursuant
       to section 46 of the Forestry Act 1967.[/quote]
       Not sure about your use of the word 'may' here - your case is
       presumably that the land is subject to byelaws.
       #Post#: 113711--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus PCN, Claim form received DCBLegal - Forestry Engl
       and land
       By: Jameuy Date: March 19, 2026, 7:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you for your input. :)
       I will take out the bit about their claim and change the wording
       of “may” to “is”. I just wasn’t sure about stating “is”, which
       could invite questions as to how can I prove that.
       So with the above changes, do you think I can go ahead and
       submit on MCOL website?
       I have not clicked as far as defence submission page to see what
       the page/process looks like as I am wary that it says changes
       will be saved/submitted if I do that. So I just want to check if
       what I have provided here is acceptable in its current format to
       go ahead with submission?
       Thank you
       #Post#: 113713--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus PCN, Claim form received DCBLegal - Forestry Engl
       and land
       By: InterCity125 Date: March 19, 2026, 7:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Looks good.
       I would personally add one further point and place it second to
       last;
       That given that the Claimant is unable to prove keeper liability
       and, with the driver not known by the Claimant, there is no
       legal route by which the Claimant can hold me liable (just to
       reenforce your previous point)
       And a further point which could be placed nearer the top;
       That this is a breach of contract issue, and, as such, there is
       absolutely no legal requitement for a vehicle keeper to identify
       a driver to an unregulated private parking operator - to be
       clear, I will not be nominating a driver under any circumstance.
       #Post#: 113714--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus PCN, Claim form received DCBLegal - Forestry Engl
       and land
       By: jfollows Date: March 19, 2026, 7:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There’s a “no” missing from the last paragraph above, isn’t
       there?
       #Post#: 113716--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus PCN, Claim form received DCBLegal - Forestry Engl
       and land
       By: DWMB2 Date: March 19, 2026, 7:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Jameuy link=topic=10089.msg113711#msg113711
       date=1773922775]
       I just wasn’t sure about stating “is”, which could invite
       questions as to how can I prove that.
       [/quote]
       You may well be proving it, as it's a key point in your defence.
       For when it comes to that:
       [list type=decimal]
       [li]Forest of Bere West Walk Plan
  HTML https://www.forestryengland.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Forest%20of%20Bere%20Forest%20Plan%20West%20Walk_0.pdf<br
       />- Page 6 of the attached shows a boundary of a "management
       area", which includes the car park[/li]
       [li]Forestry Commission Byelaws
  HTML https://www.forestryengland.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Forestry%20Commission_Byelaws.pdf<br
       />- 6 & 7 control parking and the use of vehicles on the land.
       "Lands of the commissioners" is defined under 2.[/li]
       [/list]
       #Post#: 113745--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus PCN, Claim form received DCBLegal - Forestry Engl
       and land
       By: Jameuy Date: March 19, 2026, 12:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks all, made those amendments and submitted the defence
       today.
       TYVM for the links DWMB2 - very helpful!
       Will update with what happens next!
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page