DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 113578--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  GroupNexus - Saffron Kitchen Stratford E15
       By: jfollows Date: March 18, 2026, 3:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/how-does-the-pcn-deadline-work-while-transferring-liability-from-hertz-to-hirerk/msg102044/#msg102044<br
       />also seems to be a NtK sent to the hirer from Group Nexus, yes
       .
       The link is to a longer appeal specifically pointing this out,
       which could be used with appropriate modifications here.
       The earlier appeal was
       [quote]I am the hirer of the vehicle and I dispute your Parking
       Charge. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and will
       be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your
       client, [s]Moto Blyth[/s].
       What you have sent me is not a compliant Notice to Hirer (NtH)
       under Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. It is
       plainly just a copy of the Notice to Keeper previously sent to
       [s]Hertz[/s], re-addressed to me and still purporting to rely on
       paragraph 9. That is not how liability is transferred to a
       Hirer.
       You have failed to comply with the strict requirements of PoFA
       Schedule 4 paragraphs 13 and 14. As your NtH does not fully
       comply with ALL the requirements of PoFA 2012, you are unable to
       hold the Hirer of the vehicle liable for the charge. Partial or
       even substantial compliance is not sufficient. There will be no
       admission as to who was driving and no inference or assumptions
       can be drawn. GroupNexus has relied on contract law allegations
       of breach against the driver only.
       The Hirer cannot be presumed or inferred to have been the
       driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation of the law
       of agency. Your NtH can only hold the driver liable. GroupNexus
       have no hope at POPLA, so you are urged to save us both a
       complete waste of time and cancel the PCN[/quote]
       In the linked case, Group Nexus rejected the appeal but gave up
       when a POPLA appeal was filed.
       #Post#: 113603--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  GroupNexus - Saffron Kitchen Stratford E15
       By: DWMB2 Date: March 18, 2026, 6:54 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I would recommend an appeal on the lines of the above. Ideally,
       you want to avoid GroupNexus referring back to the hire company,
       who may just pay up and try to recover this from you, which is a
       hassle you could well do without.
       #Post#: 113612--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  GroupNexus - Saffron Kitchen Stratford E15
       By: InterCity125 Date: March 18, 2026, 8:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think in the circumstances I would keep the lease company in
       the loop.
       Send an email briefly explaining the situation and ask them to
       put a note on the account specifically stating that you do not
       want them paying any parking charges on your vehicle.
       Ask that they confirm this by emailed response.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page