URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 111148--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus the gym group PCN
       By: DWMB2 Date: February 25, 2026, 11:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'm mindful of this not becoming a broader discussion that
       ceases to become helpful to the OP.
       The broad point I was seeking to make is that, in the absence of
       any precedent, all members must be careful to avoid using
       wording that suggests, either explicitly or by omission "this
       argument will work".
       [member=7581]Brenda_R2[/member] &
       [member=6750]InterCity125[/member] may have different
       experiences to me, as the court hearings they have attended
       (whether as a defendant or otherwise) will have been in front of
       different judges than mine. I have found that different judges
       often take very different views on "technical" arguments.
       As long as OPs are aware (and accordingly, those offering advice
       ensure posters are made aware) that some arguments are more
       well-trodden than others, and none are devoid of risk, that's
       fine.
       #Post#: 111408--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus the gym group PCN
       By: Higym Date: February 27, 2026, 11:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sorry for asking again but in the initial appeal can I use both
       the non compliance with poFa argument AND also state the driver
       is a gym member and attach proof of gym visit?
       (To add, last night the error was made again, forgot to put reg
       in whilst visiting gym! So expecting another letter soon)
       What's the best advice really?
       #Post#: 111409--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus the gym group PCN
       By: Brenda_R2 Date: February 27, 2026, 11:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Higym link=topic=10016.msg111408#msg111408
       date=1772213960]
       What's the best advice really?
       [/quote]
       Post 17
       #Post#: 111413--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus the gym group PCN
       By: Higym Date: February 27, 2026, 1:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks, any opinion on:
       in the initial appeal can I use BOTH the non compliance with
       poFa argument AND also state the driver is a gym member and
       attach proof of gym visit?
       #Post#: 111446--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus the gym group PCN
       By: Brenda_R2 Date: February 27, 2026, 11:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Just copy and paste Intercity125s post.  Don't add to it, don't
       remove anything from it.
       To manage your expectations, you should expect your appeal to
       fail.  That isn't a reflection on the wording of the appeal but
       the way of the world; if parking companies upheld valid appeals
       their revenue stream would dry up.
       #Post#: 111452--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus the gym group PCN
       By: InterCity125 Date: February 28, 2026, 2:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Higym link=topic=10016.msg111413#msg111413
       date=1772218826]
       Thanks, any opinion on:
       in the initial appeal can I use BOTH the non compliance with
       poFa argument AND also state the driver is a gym member and
       attach proof of gym visit?
       [/quote]
       The reason to suggest a single appeal point is to ensure that
       the operator (and then POPLA) have to address the non PoFA
       issue.
       If you pad the appeal out you present the operator with the
       opportunity to skip past the awkward legal points and focus on
       the subjective issues.
       #Post#: 111462--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus the gym group PCN
       By: Higym Date: February 28, 2026, 4:06 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ok, if I am expecting the appeal to fail, can I not just ignore
       this totally?
       Any consequences if I just don't respond?
       #Post#: 111467--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus the gym group PCN
       By: InterCity125 Date: February 28, 2026, 4:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It will reflect better on the keeper if they are seen to engage
       with the operator.
       This is a very well worn path.
       The parking operators have their methods which takes advantage
       of the fact that they know how the legal system works and, as
       such, they know how to 'play things' - we fight fire with fire
       in that respect by following the well worn path in terms of how
       handle things.
       #Post#: 111474--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus the gym group PCN
       By: DWMB2 Date: February 28, 2026, 4:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As above, essentially. Disputes over alleged debts can
       eventually end up in court. You can just ignore things until
       they end up in court and fight the matter there but there are a
       few good reasons to engage at each stage:
       [list type=decimal]
       [li]You might win: whilst there's a good chance your appeals
       will fail, you might succeed. If you don't appeal, they'll
       definitely fail. [/li]
       [li]You show you're up for a fight: parking companies don't take
       100% of cases to court. There's always a chance that by showing
       you're not an easy target they give up.[/li]
       [li]You show you've been reasonable: courts expect litigation to
       be seen as a last resort, and to that end, expect parties
       involved in a dispute to take steps to resolve the matter
       amicably, only going to court if that fails. By engaging now,
       you can show that you have behaved reasonably[/li]
       [/list]
       #Post#: 111477--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus the gym group PCN
       By: Higym Date: February 28, 2026, 5:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ok, many thanks for explaining, sorrt for all the qs!
       on the appeal website, do I choose as a reason 'i had permission
       to park at the site' or 'other'
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page