DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Fresh
HTML https://fresh.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Welcome
*****************************************************
#Post#: 442--------------------------------------------------
Programmable T-shirts: technology sneaks into fashion
By: anno rani Date: September 10, 2023, 6:56 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The discrepancies that arose within NATO after actions in the
Serbian war in support of Kosovo's decision to unilaterally
declare itself an independent country continued after the
attacks of September 11, 2001 in New York. George Bush claimed
the right to carry out preventive war actions to defend his
security on a global scale. The White House asked NATO partner
countries for help and demanded the application of Article 5 of
mutual defense of the Treaty.
This article obliges, in the event of an attack on a coalition
member state, to support and participate Phone Number List
HTML https://asiaemaillist.me/
in defense of the attacked country.
Finally USAIt would not demand its compliance and in October
2001 it began its attacks in Afghanistan unilaterally, at the
head of a coalition in which the rest of the countries played a
secondary role of political cover for its war actions.
[img]
HTML https://scontent.fdac5-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/376234703_276480471843544_4706940711438956754_n.jpg?_nc_cat=108&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=49d041&_nc_ohc=FrjMnFHEe3IAX_n_yTO&_nc_ht=scontent.fdac5-2.fna&oh=00_AfA7bGMejJe0WXImB1oo5VCINbBT6TauVwhgiTc8tOl09w&oe=6502FE4E[/img]
HTML https://asiaemaillist.me/
Why didn't the US demand the application of Article 5 of NATO ?
Basically, because it did not trust its European allies and
reserved for NATO a subsidiary role in the occupation operation
Enduring Freedom, as was seen shortly afterwards, in January
2002, when NATO assumed command of the InternationalIt is
precisely this legitimacy that Navalny's "smart vote" campaign
sought to erode. The opposition leader designated for each
district the candidate with the best chance of defeating the
candidate from Putin's party, United Russia.
*****************************************************