URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Firearms and Ammunition
  HTML https://firearmsandammunition.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Anything firearms related
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 52--------------------------------------------------
       Liberal ignorance
   DIR By: allmanav
       Date: February 6, 2020, 8:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Three Conservative MPs clashed with Public Safety Minister Bill
       Blair Thursday over opposition claims that Prime Minister Justin
       Trudeau misled the Commons in an earlier question period bout
       over Liberal plans to bring in U.S.-styled “red flag” laws.
       The legislation would open new avenues for citizens and abused
       women to access police or the courts for firearm seizures and
       license revocations in threatening situations.
       The heated confrontation near the end of question period sparked
       Blair to suggest that Quebec Conservative MP Steven Blaney, a
       former public safety minister under the Harper government, was
       “unconscionable” after Blaney and the other Conservatives said
       existing law gives police, firearm officers and the courts
       plenty of grounds for gun seizures and licence revocations.
       READ MORE: Liberal Red Flag plan panned by gun safety advocate
       and firearm lobby leader
       The confrontation began in Wednesday’s question period when
       Trudeau told the Conservatives a new regime is needed because
       although police have the ability to remove firearms from a gun
       owner who presents a threat to themselves or others, they
       “cannot suspend the licence and prevent the person from
       acquiring new firearms.”
       “That is what the red flag law is all about,” Trudeau said,
       sparking a loud and angry response from Conservatives, who
       believe the existing law is adequate.
       It is unclear what Trudeau meant since sections in the federal
       Firearms Act and Criminal Code prescribe for police seizure of
       firearms as well as licence revocation in cases of gun threats
       or violence.
       Blaney, the second of the three Conservatives to go after
       Trudeau and Blair, claimed federal law is already clear: police
       can suspend firearms licences and prevent someone with mental
       and health issues or links to crime from acquiring a firearm in
       the first place.
       “The law is clear, so nothing needs to be changed,” he told
       Blair.
       “Why attack honest citizens instead of tackling the real
       problem, street gang.”
       The comment drew a hot response from Blair, a former Toronto
       police chief who spent his entire police career with the Toronto
       service.
       “Anyone who suggests the constant threat that women in an
       abusive relationship face from the potential of firearms in the
       home, for anyone to suggest nothing needs to be done is
       unconscionable,” Blair said in response to Blaney’s position.
       “The current law is very clear, if a firearm owner poses a
       threat, authorities can confiscate firearms and suspend
       licenses, preventing further purchases of firearms or
       possession,” Calgary Conservative MP Bob Benzen responded.
       “If our public safety minister actually had a PAL (possession
       and acquisition licence) or an RPL (restricted possession and
       acquisition licence) he would already know this instead of
       trying to dig out [of this],” said Benzen, who represents
       Stephen Harper’s former riding.
       “I will admit I’m not a recreational firearm user but I have
       actually enforced and used these laws to keep communities and
       people safe,” retorted Blair.
       “What I can tell you, the authority that exists in law, the laws
       that are currently available, that enable law enforcement to
       seize firearms and to revoke licence are limited in their
       application, and it is only in the circumstances where
       reasonable and probable grounds exist, and it is only in
       circumstances where a seizure of a firearm has taken place that
       a firearm (licence) can be revoked,” Blair claimed.
       “Let me be very clear, red flag laws save lives. I’ve actually
       used those sections of the Criminal Code to seize firearms in
       these dangerous situations, and I can also advise you Mr.
       Speaker of the limitations of those laws,” he continued.
       “We know that the average assaulted woman in Canada is assaulted
       25 times in a domestic relationship before the police are in
       fact called.”
       Alberta Conservative MP Glen Motz, a former police inspector who
       served 35 years on the Medicine Hat police service, lodged a
       complaint with Commons Speaker Anthony Rota on Wednesday,
       claiming Trudeau had misrepresented the gun laws in force.
       But as of Thursday Rota had not made any ruling by question
       period.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1