URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Express Gaming RolePlay
  HTML https://expressgamingrp.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Resolved complaints
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 75--------------------------------------------------
       Complaint against Rachel_Jones[Resolved]
       By: Nixon! Date: December 29, 2012, 2:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [B][U][COLOR=STEELBLUE]Your in-game name:
       Nathaniel_Devito
       [/COLOR][/U][/B][B][U][COLOR=STEELBLUE]Date of the incident:
       29.12.12
       [/COLOR][/U][/B][B][U][COLOR=STEELBLUE]The rule breaker:
       Rachel_Jones
       [/COLOR][/U][/B][B][U][COLOR=STEELBLUE]The rule(s) they broke:
       Powergaming.
       Evidance[/COLOR][/U][/B] :
       So basically, I did an advert stating that I need workers, so
       she called me. Sure, me and her talked, etc, etc, untill she
       told me to put my hands up in the air. And so I did. She then
       frisked me. I WAS CLEAN. She said I had weapons. So I did /do
       Are you lying or powergaming? She replied with /do You had
       weapons.
       This, this is obvious powergame. I did not have ANY sort of
       weapons, yet she forced an action on me saying that I do have a
       weapon, in /do. If it was IC, then it'd be just lying, but if
       it's /do, it's OOC, therefore, it's quite dramatically,
       powergaming. Oh yes, then all of a sudden, I get accused of
       metagaming by her(?)
       SS:
  HTML http://s9.postimage.org/dlw82aspb/sa_mp_079.png
  HTML http://postimage.org/
       The only way of her to prove she's not lying, is for her to post
       a SS of her frisking me and showing I do have a 'Desert Eagle',
       but she's refusing, therefore she :
       (a) has no defence against this.
       (b) might be lying, not showing valid evidence - get it?
       #Post#: 76--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Complaint against Rachel_Jones
       By: Michael Date: December 29, 2012, 3:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]Waiting for Rachel's Input. [/center]
       [center]You have 24 hours to provide us with your reason else
       this complaint will be declared against you[/center]
       #Post#: 77--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Complaint against Rachel_Jones
       By: MrDanielz Date: December 29, 2012, 3:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello there, This is rachel jones, This is my side of the story,
       I was RP'ing a trick undercover, So i went and found Nathaniel
       RP'ly and we disscussed, Then the time came, We told him to put
       his hands in the air , He did so, I frisked him RP'ly and found
       a Phone and a desert eagle (( FROM VIP )) So I rp'ed everything,
       But as i was RP'ing i didnt take A SS Cause i didnt know id be
       reported for RP'ing  Nathaniel give up mate, I was RP'ing ALSO 1
       RULE IS
       You are being Arrested IC'ly you ....  :D  Dude, You also
       wouldnt answer our /do's or anything so you were non - rp'ing :!
       #Post#: 78--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Complaint against Rachel_Jones
       By: Nixon! Date: December 29, 2012, 3:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Funny of you to lie now, desert eagle from VIP? No. I did not
       even buy a desert eagle from vip as I simply did not have enough
       tokens.
       Caus I didn't know i'd be reported? OH, LETS CHECK THE CHAT LOG.
       [20:22:36] Nathaniel Devito: (( You forced roleplay on me, in
       /do saying I have weapons ))
       [20:22:39] Nathaniel Devito: (( When I did not. ))
       [20:22:44] Rachel Jones: (( You did. ))
       [20:22:45] Nathaniel Devito: (( Therefore, it's powergaming. ))
       [20:22:47] Nathaniel Devito: (( No, I did not. ))
       [20:22:48] Rachel Jones: (( I took them away from you. ))
       [20:22:52] Nathaniel Devito: (( Prove it, take a SS now. ))
       [20:22:54] Nathaniel Devito: (( Take a SS of your frisk and post
       it. ))
       [20:23:05] Rachel Jones: (( ??? I aint proving stuff to you,
       dude THIS IS IC ))
       [20:23:07] Rachel Jones: (( STAY IC ))
       Oh..and here's me telling her 30 seconds LATER later she's being
       reported:
       [20:23:43] Gottaid says: if it's power gaming , post an FC .
       [20:23:43] Nathaniel Devito: (( because of.* ))
       [20:23:47] Rachel Jones says: Alright
       [20:23:52] Nathaniel Devito: (( Of I am to posting the FC then!
       ))
       Please, you had ENOUGH time to take a SS, and I did not reply
       simply because I was posting this FC. Yes, I came from alt
       tabbed just to take some SS :)
       Admins; this should be really easy to find in the logs, you have
       been given the exact time from my chat logs^^
       There was also an OOC lie involved, which I nearly missed out
       Rachel!
       [20:18:34] Rachel Jones: (( radio that i talk on aint faction
       its friend frequency ))
       It clearly was as 10 seconds later after you said "Market"over
       the radio the cop came. Haha :)
       #Post#: 80--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Complaint against Rachel_Jones
       By: Michael Date: December 29, 2012, 3:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]Rachel_Jones is set to be prisoned for 10 minutes for
       Powergaming[/center]
       #Post#: 83--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Complaint against Rachel_Jones
       By: Nixon! Date: December 29, 2012, 5:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I believe Rachel to be prisoned for 20 minutes, as they prisoned
       me for 10 minutes..
       #Post#: 109--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Complaint against Rachel_Jones
       By: Jimmy Date: December 30, 2012, 6:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Fixed and Closed
       *****************************************************