URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Even Greener Pastures
  HTML https://evengreener.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Cultural Miscellanea
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 11082--------------------------------------------------
       Western and Eastern Philosophy! Is it all about "makes sens
       e" or understanding the "very essence"?
       By: Sudeep Date: January 5, 2019, 11:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Came across this comment on a post(which was a good one!) that
       made me ask this question here to know different prospective.
       Why is it how it is? And what do YOU think irrespective of this
       western and eastern label? I want to know your very opinion.
  HTML https://qr.ae/TUnrSw
       In case if you can't read the comment I am talking about here is
       this I am pasting it here:
       [quote]Prof. Subba Iyerji asked a question on my view on Daniel
       Goleman’s theory of multiple intelligences.
       Western psychology and Eastern psychology differ in their
       approach.
       Western psychology proceeds with the assumption that the
       external world is very real and our interaction with the
       external world in a prescribed way is the yard stick of the
       normal psychology. More acceptance of the reality of the
       external world and a smooth interaction with it is considered as
       normal psychology. This is social psychology.
       Empathy and emotional psychology is once capability to
       understand others pain, happiness, their usefulness to us now
       and in future etc. One who is adept at naturally adopting to the
       whims and fancies of the external world is indeed considered as
       a normal individual. This is what is taught in schools,
       colleges.
       Eastern psychology is based on subjectivity. The internal
       feeling of being with oneself was the yardstick of the
       normality.
       We naturally want to live comfortably and happily in the
       external world. It means we constantly assess others to see
       whether they can be a source of happiness to us or not. That is
       what we commonly say, “Putting our key of happiness in somebody
       else’s pocket.”
       We are dependent on the external world of people, environment,
       and objects for our happiness. All our modern education is based
       on this theory. How to explore the external world for the
       comfort of the physical body is the basic aim of our science!
       According to the Eastern thought one who is dependent on others
       and the external world is indeed an unintelligent person. They
       knew for certain that it is impossible to gain happiness from
       outside as happiness is already within us. All we are supposed
       to do is to slide away the objects and the people that are
       obstructing our inherent happiness.
       Eastern thought strongly believes that if the road is full of
       thorns, it is better to wear shoes rather than fixing the entire
       external road.
       Western thought is quite opposite to this idea. It wants
       possessions, accolades, achievements to be happy.
       Eastern psychology gave more importance to strengthen the inner
       personality. This strengthening started with the question, “Who
       am I?”
       Once we are immersed in this inner thought, there are no issues
       with the outer world. When outer world is not nagging us, we are
       at peace with ourselves.
       The real culprit of psychological issues is our own inseparable
       identification with the physical body and the external world.
       Our whole life is spent solving the issues created by the
       outside objects and outside persons. Some of them cannot cope up
       with this and become psychologically ill.
       As far as I know, there is no patient who is sent back without
       medication by a psychiatrist. They have drugs that change the
       level of dopamine, serotonin, norepinephrine, and GABA. They
       play with the permutation and combination of these neuro
       transmitters. Patients and especially attenders think that they
       will be cured by these medicine. It is impossible as they are
       meddling artificially with the combination and ratio of the
       neurotransmitters. Once the drug is withdrawn, the condition
       becomes worse. There is no cure here.
       The eastern way of subjective approach and cognitive
       discrimination alone changes the neural connections. There is no
       doubt about this.[quote/]
       #Post#: 11107--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Western and Eastern Philosophy! Is it all about "makes 
       sense" or understanding the "very essence
       By: Susan Date: January 6, 2019, 1:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That pretty much makes sense to me, except instead of calling it
       ¨the Western psychology¨ I think the better term is ¨the Medical
       Model,¨ or at least he alludes to the Medical Model when he
       rightly describes that if you go to a psychiatrist you will be
       offered a prescription.   The medical model is also based on
       that ¨external reality¨ of having objective symptoms able to be
       judged by someone else.
       #Post#: 11137--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Western and Eastern Philosophy! Is it all about "makes 
       sense" or understanding the "very essence
       By: Alharacas Date: January 7, 2019, 6:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don't think I know enough about the subject to give a sensible
       answer to your question, Sudeep.
       However, I would like to point out that not all Western
       countries are the same and that  "Western thought [...] wants
       possessions, accolades, achievements to be happy" is definitely
       not true to the same extent in every Western country.
       For example, I was taught that basing life choices on the
       likelihood of making a lot of money was a thoroughly bad idea
       and would probably lead to great unhappiness. (Excelling at
       whatever you do, on the other hand, was considered important.)
       Likewise, "being popular" is not considered an achievement in my
       country.
       "achievements" - well, yes. Sort of. While it's sensible, of
       course, to wear shoes on a thorny road (whether a real or a
       figurative one), we also think it's a good idea to start paving
       it. ;)
       #Post#: 11166--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Western and Eastern Philosophy! Is it all about "makes 
       sense" or understanding the "very essence
       By: Sudeep Date: January 8, 2019, 12:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you Susanne and Susan for your opinions:) I never heard of
       this term called "medical model". Thanks for mentioning. Now,
       that I read your views and I feel like there is no such things
       like western or eastern philosophy rather it depends on
       individual. It's about how we see what we see rather than what
       the world wants us to see. If we are satisfied with the way we
       perceive things without any further questions or letting our
       curiosity kicks in, then we are genuinely happy and have it what
       we really want. I don't know if that makes sense to you ;D
       *****************************************************