URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Even Greener Pastures
  HTML https://evengreener.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Found on the Internet
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 19137--------------------------------------------------
       More boys are born after war. Why?
       By: Nikola Date: August 14, 2019, 3:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Here's an interesting phenomenon I didn't know about.
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRRg0-TsKlM
       #Post#: 19138--------------------------------------------------
       Re: More boys are born after war. Why?
       By: Aliph Date: August 14, 2019, 4:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I am a bit perplexed. Tall men father more boys. Ok. But how
       come that some tall men have children of different sex?
       About the jubilation after the end of a war and the unknown
       biological mechanism that favors the production of spermatozoa
       that will give life to boys...all this seems a bit esoteric to
       me.
       However “ se non é vero, é ben trovato”= even if it is not true,
       it is well conceived.
       #Post#: 19139--------------------------------------------------
       Re: More boys are born after war. Why?
       By: Truman Overby Date: August 14, 2019, 4:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Sofia link=topic=1333.msg19138#msg19138
       date=1565817790]
       it is well conceived.
       [/quote]
       Nice pun.
       #Post#: 19142--------------------------------------------------
       Re: More boys are born after war. Why?
       By: SHL Date: August 14, 2019, 11:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sorry, but I didn‘t listen to your video Nikola, but I have no
       problem believing it to be true.
       When you think about it, men have been the ones historically to
       fight wars. Hence, when a war is over, there is likely a
       shortage of men. Right?
       So, it makes total sense to me that more males would be born
       after a war as maybe nature‘s way of replenishing the lost
       man-power due to the war or something. Of course, how and why
       this would occur seems hard to imagine. But, you see the logic?
       That’s why I say it wouldn’t surprise me, but I surely couldn’t
       explain it or even theorize about it.
       Ever hear the theory of alcoholism? It’s an interesting one. It
       sort of goes like this. There is no gene for alcoholism as such,
       of course, but there is evidence of a gene or genes of some sort
       which predispose to addiction in a general sense. That’s why
       some people can drink alcohol without becoming alcoholics and
       other cannot, and it explains why alcoholism runs in families.
       If you do a demographics study, you find higher rates of
       alcoholism in conquered populations. The theory is that the
       non-alcoholic men in a group /tribe would be the first to go out
       and fight in the war, because they were healthier and stronger
       due to not being alcoholic. The alcoholic men would sort of hang
       back, avoid the battle, and hide under the rocks (for lack of a
       better analogy). If the population group were conquered, all or
       most of the strong and healthy non-alcoholic men likely got
       killed off, and an overabundance of alcoholic men survived to
       breed with the women (because the alcoholic population avoided
       the battle) passing on the genetic inclination toward alcoholism
       to their off-spring.
       It’s just an hypothesis (I suppose that’s the right word) but it
       kind of makes sense. Also, you see clusters of alcoholism in
       specific areas. For instance, higher rates are seen in Ireland
       and Scotland, as compared to England. Ireland was England‘s
       first conquered colony, then Scotland came later I suppose. If
       you take a map of Europe, so I‘ve been told, and drew a wide
       band starting in central France and ran that band across into
       Russia, you will find higher rates of alcoholism within the band
       (I have no idea how wide the band would be, but imagine it to
       extend through Central Europe). If you go North of the band,
       toward Scandinavia, the alcoholism rates drop. If you go South
       of the band, toward Italy, the alcoholism rates also drop.
       It’s an interesting phenomenon.
       #Post#: 19145--------------------------------------------------
       Re: More boys are born after war. Why?
       By: Nikola Date: August 15, 2019, 1:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=SHL link=topic=1333.msg19142#msg19142
       date=1565842604]
       When you think about it, men have been the ones historically to
       fight wars. Hence, when a war is over, there is likely a
       shortage of men. Right?
       So, it makes total sense to me that more males would be born
       after a war as maybe nature‘s way of replenishing the lost
       man-power due to the war or something. Of course, how and why
       this would occur seems hard to imagine. But, you see the logic?
       That’s why I say it wouldn’t surprise me, but I
       surely couldn’t explain it or even theorize about it.
       [/quote]
       I do see the logic and I was thinking the same but I suppose the
       question should be "how" rather than "why". Shame Irena's not
       here, she'd probably just post a link to some study that would
       explain the whole thing.
       #Post#: 19146--------------------------------------------------
       Re: More boys are born after war. Why?
       By: SHL Date: August 15, 2019, 2:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Nikola link=topic=1333.msg19145#msg19145
       date=1565894828]
       [quote author=SHL link=topic=1333.msg19142#msg19142
       date=1565842604]
       When you think about it, men have been the ones historically to
       fight wars. Hence, when a war is over, there is likely a
       shortage of men. Right?
       So, it makes total sense to me that more males would be born
       after a war as maybe nature‘s way of replenishing the lost
       man-power due to the war or something. Of course, how and why
       this would occur seems hard to imagine. But, you see the logic?
       That’s why I say it wouldn’t surprise me, but I surely couldn’t
       explain it or even theorize about it.
       [/quote]
       I do see the logic and I was thinking the same but I suppose the
       question should be "how" rather than "why". Shame Irena's not
       here, she'd probably just post a link to some study that would
       explain the whole thing.
       [/quote]
       Oh, I doubt that even Irena would have an answer to it, or know
       of a study.
       I can‘t even imagine an hypothesis to explain it like in the
       alcoholism example that would make sense. Why would a war cause
       men to produce more X chromosome sperm (I suppose that’s not on
       the banned word list) because women certainly couldn’t have
       anything to do with it biologically. It would have to have
       something to do with the effect of war on men.
       The only thing I can think of that even comes close (sort of) to
       the issue of war and offspring was a study done I believe in
       East Germany in the 1960s or so. Women who gave birth to sons
       during the war had a statistically significant higher rate of
       having sons who later were gay, as opposed to a sample of women
       giving birth to boys born after 1945. Why, no one can explain. I
       doubt the research extended beyond that, but one could only
       theorize it had something to do with the stress of war on
       pregnant women and the developing fetus.
       An interesting issue, but it could have been mere coincidence as
       well. Who knows?
       #Post#: 19148--------------------------------------------------
       Re: More boys are born after war. Why?
       By: Susan Date: August 15, 2019, 6:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Here is one theory about it, based on genetics, some logic, and
       some math.  Sounds as reasonable as anything I could think of.
  HTML https://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2008-12/why-does-war-breed-more-boys/
       #Post#: 19150--------------------------------------------------
       Re: More boys are born after war. Why?
       By: SHL Date: August 16, 2019, 12:10 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Susan link=topic=1333.msg19148#msg19148
       date=1565911656]
       Here is one theory about it, based on genetics, some logic, and
       some math.  Sounds as reasonable as anything I could think of.
  HTML https://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2008-12/why-does-war-breed-more-boys/
       [/quote]
       Good job in finding the article, Susan. :)
       #Post#: 19151--------------------------------------------------
       Re: More boys are born after war. Why?
       By: Nikola Date: August 16, 2019, 2:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you, Susan. This does sound a lot less far-fetched than
       some of the hypotheses they come up with in the video, although
       I wonder if the men's height could be related (in that the same
       gene which causes a higher son-daughter ratio in different
       families might also produce taller men) so they might have been
       going the right way with that argument, only they might have
       drawn the wrong conclusion. The height wouldn't be the cause, it
       would be a byproduct of the same gene. That's just something
       that crossed my mind. As the article says, this gene still
       hasn't been discovered, and I think it could be difficult
       because not all men know exactly how many children they have (or
       where).
       *****************************************************