URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Erie Canal Neighbors Association
  HTML https://ecna.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Erie Canal & Embankment Dam Integrity
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 1609--------------------------------------------------
       Re: EEIP Draft Now Published, More Questions from the ECNA go
       unanswered
   DIR By: Doug K
       Date: July 14, 2021, 2:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       We've added to the list of questions, also posted in the 10am
       Zoom Meeting Chat Window, which hopefully will get some answers,
       or at least send along the message to the Canal Corporation and
       NYPA that the idea of holding a Public Forum and not allowing a
       Q & A session wasn't a hit with their fans or their opposition.
       1) Will your neighbors in the Western Section, specifically the
       "60 mile pool", who had their adjacent Canal Embankments
       Remediated through the EERP effort, now fall under the EEIP
       Guidelines (and guidebook) for Embankment Maintenance,
       Inspections & Best Practices?
       1a)If yes, how do we contact the NYSCC for issues that have
       developed "post-clearing", like the need for Toe Drains or
       Ditches to capture Embankment runoff? Is there an assigned
       point-of-contact for your Canal Neighbors to contact and discuss
       issues?
       2) Can you explain why the NYS Canal Corporation, and NYPA, both
       NY Government agencies, chose to not correct mis-information and
       false claims being made about the EEIP program, including that
       the effort being made to clear earthen embankments falls under
       "public safety" and not tree-harvesting for profit? Didn't that
       decision leave many in even more danger, from false information
       regarding their safety?
       3) Will the NYSCC be asking Bergmann PC to create Flood
       Inundation Maps for Perinton, Pittsford, Brighton and all other
       areas in Monroe County, where residents live more than 40 feet
       below the earthen embankment dams and have no knowledge of the
       possible flood danger?
       4) You have asked for input on the NYS Canal Corporation EEIP
       effort, Maintenance Guidebook and SEQR Impact Statement, yet
       most people who would be affected by a Canal Breach do NOT even
       know they are in danger, isn't that a correct statement? How
       will you remedy this?
       5) Has it become obvious to the NYSCC that the EEIP Zoom Meeting
       isn't going to be a "hit", only allowing Comments and not
       answering Questions that many people have. And this method of
       communication isn't what has happened in the past with Canal
       Corporation Public Meetings, where Canal Neighbors have had a
       chance to have Q&A time. When will that Q & A session happen on
       EEIP work?
       #Post#: 1610--------------------------------------------------
       Re: EEIP Draft Now Published
   DIR By: Michael Caswell
       Date: July 14, 2021, 3:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Well! Maybe I'm wrong, but I loved the meeting. It was just what
       I have been telling the NYPA to do for years.
       1. Don't have public meetings. People just ramble on with stuff
       like 'It's not a dam! What about the shade? Where are all the
       squirrels going to live? How much money is the CC getting for
       the trees? We'll have no oxygen! etc etc.
       2. If you must have these meetings, don't let people run the
       show. Take control. If you have a message, make sure you spell
       it out, without interruption.  I guess COVID has been good in
       that respect. We haven't had rooms full of people wanting to
       rant on.
       3. Limit their time. A ZOOM meeting did that.
       Yep! Now the NYPA has complied with SEQR, and hopefully, they
       can get on uninterrupted to remove this vegetation and make our
       citizens safe from death by drowning.
       Let's also not forget Bill's Smith's rant! He seems to forget
       that the 'expert witness' the STCC called in to testify that
       trees were good for wooded slopes, later qualified that he was
       referring to levees, not Earthen Embankment Dams.  But I suspect
       Bill already knew that, he just didn't want to admit it. He's
       certainly put a lot of citizen's lives at risk with his antics.
       #Post#: 1611--------------------------------------------------
       Re: EEIP Draft Now Published, Zoom Meeting Met SEQR
       Requirements, Perzactly
   DIR By: Doug K
       Date: July 14, 2021, 4:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Don't get me wrong, I LOVED the new "normal" when it comes to
       Embankment Dam Repair.
       From the Canal Corporation side:
       SEQR says: RELEASE a comprehensive set of EEIP documents, not
       READ them to the Public
       SEQR says: Take Public Comments... send or speak those comments,
       be SPECIFIC to our documents
       SEQR says: Incorporate Public Input if it adds value, update and
       RELEASE final EEIP documents.
       No fuss, no muss, no wasted time.
       And if you don't add value, it really doesn't matter.
       #Post#: 1712--------------------------------------------------
       EEIP Guide Book Highlights - Short Version
   DIR By: Michael Caswell
       Date: August 15, 2021, 11:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The short version of the EEIP Guide Book
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page