URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Data Report
  HTML https://datareport.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Covid Treatments
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 2416--------------------------------------------------
       Recent COVID-19 vaccination tied to lower risk of long COVID
       By: Data Report Date: November 21, 2024, 9:31 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Recent COVID-19 vaccination tied to lower risk of long COVID.
       This study was posted on November 6th, 2024.
       Source of information.
       1. CIDRAP
  HTML https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/recent-covid-19-vaccination-tied-lower-risk-long-covid?fbclid=IwY2xjawGZPQdleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHfFDJdMwg5P3USAocH82o-JQnraUbtRQmIUpL6wRvboWYTj55u6CSDLcRg_aem_7ybMmH0t0ZzkbNYUTkDcSw
       #Post#: 2420--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Recent COVID-19 vaccination tied to lower risk of long COVID
       By: Masked Man Date: November 22, 2024, 1:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I tried to determine more details about this study here:
  HTML https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24011794
       .
       ...such as precisely what type, dose, and boosters of COVID-19
       vaccines in each individual...
       I'm also trying to pinpoint as to which variants were actually
       occuring in these four Japanese municipalities between August
       2020 and December 2022.
       I must protest and politely question the title of just this
       particular study. I think we are being misled by a news reporter
       from University of Minnesota namely  Stephanie Soucheray, MA to
       take a Japanese study from August 2020 to December 2022 and
       claim that the recent covid 19 vaccination is tied to lower risk
       considering her article is written on November 6, 2024 when she
       cites the Japanese study which is way back in August 2020 and
       December 2022 no doubt using an older vaccine which isn't even
       clearly cited.. all this depends on what Stephanie Soucheray
       means by the word "recent" .. I think it fair to say most
       typical readers would assume that recent vaccinations means a
       vaccination of at least this time period and year of 2024.
       Readers are likely to misinterpret the title and are going to
       think the latest vaccination available today protects them from
       long covid.
       Of course what the study is trying to say is that a recently
       given fresh shot like 14 to 149 days before you get infected
       appeared to might work at preventing long covid way back in
       August 2020 through December 2022. I guess I'm just having
       trouble with the title of this study.
       A personal side note concern: I am concerned about certain
       limitations such as variant type. I  am not sure all variants
       are equal insofar as if one variant might be worse for causing
       long covid than other variants... so Is the study addressing
       just one of the variants? I'd love to see a study that showed if
       long covid was more prevalent from one particular variant than
       from another.. for example does the Variant XEC cause more long
       covid than a different variant? Anyway I fear this particular
       study only limits itself to the study of one or two variants
       over two years ago.
       While I don't want to dismiss this study completely, I do think
       author of this study and the researchers need to state and
       disclose  very clearly which variant and which vaccine their
       study addresses in that time frame.
       I'd like to hear what others think about my critique of this
       particular study and my sidenote concerns.
       *****************************************************