URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Dumbledore's Army Refugees
  HTML https://darefugees.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Wizarding World of Harry Potter
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 8628--------------------------------------------------
       Avatar theme park set to compete with WWoHP
       By: magic_is_might Date: September 23, 2011, 2:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Couldn't find another thread on this here:
  HTML http://www.slashfilm.com/disney-reveals-details-planned-avatar-attraction/
  HTML http://www.slashfilm.com/disney-reveals-details-planned-avatar-attraction/
       I don't want to Avatar bash because I hate when people do that,
       but I think this is a horrible idea:
       This article sums it up:
       [quote]'Avatar' — a sad consolation prize for Disney
       (September 21, 2011)
       Disney finally came up with an answer to Universal's Wizarding
       World of Harry Potter — a barrel full of giant blue monkeys.
       The Imagineers better get their imaginations cranking overtime.
       Disney built its empire on great characters, great dialogue and
       great storytelling.
       "Avatar" has none of the above.
       I saw it once, my daughter saw it twice, and neither of us could
       name a Na'vi.
       We couldn't even tell you if any of the important ones died in
       that final battle with the evil white capitalists, even though
       we both darn near cried when Harry held a fatally wounded Dobby.
       Avatar has no memorable heroes, no memorable villains, no
       memorable lines, no memorable twists, not even a memorable
       musical riff.
       It has nobody that kids yearn to be. No Harry, no Hermione, no
       Luke Skywalker.
       It never penetrated the backyards and sidewalks of suburbia,
       where kids still battle with Pirates of the Caribbean swords and
       Star Wars light sabers. I didn't see any Na'vi last Halloween.
       "Avatar" was eye-popping special effects that carried a plot
       best summed up as Kevin Costner falling in love with Pocahontas
       before joining forces with Sitting Bull to kill Gen. Custer at
       the Battle of Pandora.
       We went. We saw. We went "ooooh."
       And aside from those who wanted to stay and live with the blue
       monkeys, most of us forgot.
       Harry Potter gave us a delightfully evil Voldemort cooing: "The
       boy who lived has come to die.''
       "Avatar" gave us a stereotypical Col. Quaritch bellowing: "Shut
       your pie hole!''
       This lack of style and substance could be troublesome given that
       the Na'vi won't be arriving at Disney for five years. This puts
       Disney in the uncomfortable position of planning a $500 million
       investment based largely on the success of the two "Avatar"
       sequels to come.
       Universal's challenge with Harry was not fouling up. To
       accomplish that, it gave us one great ride at Hogwarts, a nice
       facade of Hogsmeade, two recycled rides from the Lost Continent,
       a few small and very crowded stores, and a couple mediocre
       street shows.
       And people flocked from around the world because it was Harry,
       an unparalleled book and movie franchise.
       Disney can't count on that kind of loyalty for "Avatar."
       Harry came to Universal with limitless merchandising
       possibilities: Butterbeer, pumpkin juice, personalized wands,
       robes, hats, ties, monster books, chocolate frogs, Bertie Bott's
       jelly beans, brooms, bludgers, fluffy owls, and so on and so
       forth.
       But there are no official foods of Pandora. The Na'vi don't
       accessorize. Their spears are bulky. My daughter sure isn't
       wearing one of their outfits. And who wants more than one
       stuffed blue monkey?
       The Imagineers have five years to work this all out. I imagine
       they could crank out a live show with acrobatic blue monkeys, a
       parade with blue monkeys on stilts, an eye-popping 3-D movie in
       which no blue monkeys are killed, and a high-tech ride in which
       the blue monkeys are saved at the end. Wrap it all inside a
       beautiful Pandora facade, minus the turkey-leg carts.
       That would be easy, although I'm not sure how you fit a Tree of
       Souls into a theme park that already has the Tree of Life. But
       to make this attraction great will require that Disney give
       theme park Avatar the characters and storytelling that movie
       "Avatar" now lacks.
       If anyone can pull it off it's Disney. At worst, Animal Kingdom
       will be a much more interesting theme park, even if alien
       monkeys are an odd mix with terrestrial gorillas.
       And there is one other bonus in this announcement. It should get
       Universal clearing out wasted space in the Lost Continent for
       Diagon Alley, and a great new thrill ride based on the Gringotts
       Wizarding Bank.
       source:
  HTML http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2011-09-21/entertainment/os-mike-thomas-disney-avatar-092211-20110921_1_avatar-sequels-na-vi-pandora
  HTML http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2011-09-21/entertainment/os-mike-thomas-disney-avatar-092211-20110921_1_avatar-sequels-na-vi-pandora[/quote]
       This article is a bit biased, but he brings up a few good
       points: how is this going to be successful? This seems like a
       desperate move. Avatar has very few memorable characters (unlike
       HP and Disney, in general). And little marketable merchandise.
       No Avatar themed foods. I imagine it's going to be more ride
       based, but rides alone does not equal a complete, fully fledged
       theme pack.
       Personally, I think Disney is banking way too much on the
       success of Avatar 2.
       #Post#: 8652--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Avatar theme park set to compete with WWoHP
       By: kamikaze ginny Date: September 23, 2011, 7:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ugh. I hope they ditch this idea and fast. I doubt any Disney
       diehards will go for this and this and investors will be
       piiiiissed. Is it go ing in Animal Kingdom? No one likes AK
       anyway. If they want to do anything in Disney they should focus
       on making Animal Kingdom contain more continents than Africa and
       Asia, overhaul the backlot of MGM (which could include an Avatar
       ride...maybe), and expand MK (which they're doing). Maybe put in
       a new Vacation Club option at the Polynesian... anything but an
       Avatar section.
       #Post#: 8659--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Avatar theme park set to compete with WWoHP
       By: RaithGyaron Date: September 23, 2011, 7:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       One ride I could see, but a whole theme park? I finally saw it
       on Sunday because it was on and though I thought it was an
       interesting movie, it wasn't as great as Avatards made it out to
       be.
       #Post#: 9080--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Avatar theme park set to compete with WWoHP
       By: The Dude Date: September 27, 2011, 12:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don't think that a theme park would do that movie justice.
       Maybe 25 years from now they could do it. It's one thing to
       create that level of detail in a film, it's entirely another to
       make it for real.
       #Post#: 9081--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Avatar theme park set to compete with WWoHP
       By: kamikaze ginny Date: September 27, 2011, 12:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=The Dude link=topic=976.msg9080#msg9080
       date=1317145651]
       I don't think that a theme park would do that movie justice.
       Maybe 25 years from now they could do it. It's one thing to
       create that level of detail in a film, it's entirely another to
       make it for real.
       [/quote]
       Oh well I completely disagree with this. As much as I don't like
       the idea of Avatar at Disney there isn't a doubt in my mind they
       could deliver excellent and totally immersive theming. They have
       the room and the resources to do so. We're talking about a theme
       park that some how planted and has maintained trees common to
       the climate of the Pacific Northwest in Florida.
       *****************************************************