URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Dumbledore's Army Refugees
  HTML https://darefugees.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: A Song of Ice and Fire
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 44143--------------------------------------------------
       Emmy Nominations(17 Total Nominations)
   DIR By: codyesh2
       Date: July 18, 2013, 8:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML http://winteriscoming.net/2013/07/game-of-thrones-garners-17-emmy-noms/
       Outstanding Drama Series
       Emilia Clarke as Supporting Actress
       Peter Dinklage as Supporting Actor
       Diana Rigg as Guest Actress
       Writing in a Drama series for The Rains of Castamere (David
       Benioff & D.B. Weiss)
       Art Direction, single camera (Valar Dohaeris, Kissed by Fire)
       Oustanding Casting for a Drama
       Cinematography, single camera (Mhysa)
       Costumes (Walk of Punishment)
       Editing, single camera (The Rains of Castamere)
       Hairstyling, single camera (Second Sons)
       Makeup, single camera, non-prosthetic (Kissed by Fire)
       Makeup, prosthetic (Valar Dohaeris)
       Sound Editing (And Now his Watch is Ended)
       Sound Mixing, one hour (And Now his Watch is Ended)
       Special Visual Effects (Valar Dohaeris)
       Interactive Program for GoT S3 Enhanced Digital Experience
       I don't think Clarke or Dinklage have a shot. I really think
       they should have pushed for Coster-Waldau and Fairley.
       #Post#: 44144--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Emmy Nominations(17 Total Nominations)
   DIR By: Hermes_The_Exile
       Date: July 18, 2013, 11:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I saw Clarke got supporting and about choked. Just about any of
       the other women would have been more deserving. And
       Coster-Waldau was better than Dinklage this season.
       #Post#: 44147--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Emmy Nominations(17 Total Nominations)
   DIR By: codyesh2
       Date: July 18, 2013, 11:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I agree with both of those statements. Dinklage did great,
       Coster-Waldau just stole the show. I really think Dinklage's
       scenes with Shae suck.
       #Post#: 44154--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Emmy Nominations(17 Total Nominations)
   DIR By: Elektra
       Date: July 18, 2013, 2:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I can't believe Emilia Clarke got nominated. Clearly they just
       skimmed over who they thought was the 'main' character.
       She's my least favourite actress on the show.
       I'm bummed Nikolaj didn't get nominated, and Michelle Fairley
       too.
       I'm cool with Diana Rigg scoring a nomination, but if she can
       get one why not the wonderful Charles Dance?
       I wish they got a nomination in the way of music, also.
       #Post#: 44156--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Emmy Nominations(17 Total Nominations)
   DIR By: JustCallMeTaylor
       Date: July 18, 2013, 2:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Coster-Waldau definitely deserved it over Dinklage
       #Post#: 44165--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Emmy Nominations(17 Total Nominations)
   DIR By: Aussie50
       Date: July 18, 2013, 8:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yeah I agree that Fairley and Coster-Waldau were much more
       deserving than Dinklage and Clarke, but any nomination is good
       for the show so I'm still happy.
       I'm more angry at the music not getting a nomination.
       #Post#: 44171--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Emmy Nominations(17 Total Nominations)
   DIR By: Enterprising Young Man
       Date: July 18, 2013, 11:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Apparently HBO didn't submit Coster-Waldau... but they did try
       for Kit Harrington? I think Kit's fine but eh... he's too
       passive. He's really going to have to step up his game when they
       get to A Dance with Dragons.
       I don't get the big deal about Michelle Fairley. In fact, I
       actively dislike her in most scenes - but never mind. Personal
       opinions aside, if I'm not mistaken, they don't actually base
       these awards on an entire season do they? I think they only base
       it on select episodes... so really even if they did watch "Rains
       of Castamere," I don't see why they should nominate Fairley for
       that because really, I know people love to champion Michelle
       Fairley, but her only “big” moment of the season was in "Rains
       of Castamere," and even then, only at the end of the episode.
       Looking back, objectively, Clarke probably was the actress with
       the most interesting material this season. Fairley stood in the
       background frowning all season...which is, frankly, what she's
       sort of done since season one. Honestly, it really comes down to
       the simple fact that even if she was amazing in that one scene,
       the writers simplified her character, cut down a lot of her
       conflict and intrigue, and reduced her to background décor.
       This is probably also why they did not submit Coster-Waldau for
       a nomination... he was good the whole season but the only time
       he really stood out was in the bathtub scene with Brienne
       whereas, conversely, Peter Dinklage had the most consistently
       interesting material to work with - and btw, that is something
       that I don't understand. Dinklage is practically the lead actor
       of this series now so why is he still considered supporting? Or
       do they just consider anyone not named "Sean Bean" a supporting
       actor? I think, to be fair to you guys, if Dinklage and Clarke
       had been considered leading, then maybe there could have been a
       chance for Walder-Costau or Fairley or hell even Kit to get in a
       nom, but if even they're considered supporting, then surely
       Fairley is just a glorified cameo, comparatively speaking.
       Personally I think Lena Headey is the best of the actresses on
       GoT, but again, she's got a smaller role than Clarke, so if
       Clarke is considered supporting, there's obviously going to be
       no nomination for her.
       #Post#: 44176--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Emmy Nominations(17 Total Nominations)
   DIR By: The Dude
       Date: July 19, 2013, 10:54 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Exactly, I feel amongst all the actors, Dinklage and Heady have
       consistently given good performance since S1. While they didn't
       really have a standout scene in this season, they both performed
       equally well. As for the remaining, I think Clarke's only good
       bit of acting was the showdown at Astapor (although I don't
       understand why people hate her so much). Coster-Waldau's only
       good bit was bath conversation at Harrenhal and Fairley's only
       good bit was at the conclusion of the red wedding. So it really
       depends whether they are nominating them for performance in a
       single episode or performance in the season as whole.
       On a side note, I wish they show more love to Charles Dance. I
       simply love to rewatch any scene which has him in it.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1