URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       US Environmental History Class at CSW
  HTML https://cswenvirohistclass.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Mod 5, 2019
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 416--------------------------------------------------
       Re: #12: The Idea of a Garden
       By: ebartel2020 Date: March 4, 2019, 8:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A question that I found myself thinking about after class
       Friday, that relates directly to a question Rachel asking: What
       is your definition of wilderness? I have come to the conclusion
       that wilderness is a place in nature that humans had not
       modified to make it a place they can go to, a no-mans. I also
       think wilderness ties into the idea of an area being unsafe or
       has animals that could potentially harm us.
       Alice: I love your post! I think a point that really stood out
       to me was when you wrote: "My interpretation is when nature is
       defined by the absence of humans, humans can forget their
       inherent position on the earth - as just another animal. This
       changes how humans think of the world around them and their
       relationship to it, and can change their decisions". This really
       made me go a million different directions because I had never
       thought of this in this light. It leads me to think about the
       fact that we have changed this world so much and took over so
       much to the fact that we have a word for a no-mans land and I
       cannot help but ask myself the question of is this correct or
       right, no other aminals have done what we have done. I think if
       people had the view you said before, we would not be changing
       our planet so much. Not sure if this will make sense to anyone
       but I kinda just dumped my thoughts out! :)
       #Post#: 417--------------------------------------------------
       Re: #12: The Idea of a Garden
       By: nanaafiaba Date: March 4, 2019, 8:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I believe that the wilderness is largely cultural, similar to
       Pollan's views. Wilderness is a term that we have come up with
       ourselves. It is "a human construct imposed upon a much more
       variable and precarious reality" (183). This simplification
       occurs frequently in human history. We have humanized (i.e. made
       simpler) complex topics so that our human brains can comprehend
       it. I used to think that the wilderness was an area of nature
       that was untouched by humans. However, what land has not been,
       whether directly or indirectly, influenced by humans? One could
       comprehensively argue that all of the environment has been
       impacted in some way by human life. In this case, our perceived
       understanding of the wilderness would have to change.
       "'Wilderness' is not nearly as straightforward or dependable a
       guide as we'd like to believe" (186). Unfortunately for us,
       nature's multiplex and unpredictable behavior does not allow for
       a concrete definition.
       To answer Ahmed's question, I feel as if humans do need to draw
       the distinction between them and nature and the wilderness. I
       think that this separation is largely due to our guilt for the
       environmental damage we have imposed on the world. We have
       damaged "nature" so much that we feel the need to preserve some
       spaces, which we name the wilderness so that at least we are not
       at fault for the ruin of all of the environment.
       My question: How has the American definition of the wilderness
       evolved over the years? What is the difference in definitions
       from the beginning of colonization to now?
       #Post#: 418--------------------------------------------------
       Re: #12: The Idea of a Garden
       By: yzhu2020 Date: March 4, 2019, 8:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       When I think wilderness, I think of uninhabited lands with
       untamed animals and plants growing everywhere. It isn't the most
       aesthetic pleasing... Pollan's definition of wilderness is land
       untouched by humans. He described the Cathedral Pines, which is
       not considered wilderness, "are not, then, 'virgin growth'"
       (394). I think his idea towards nature, though, stands in
       between the environmental purists and putative interest of men.
       He doesn't believe that all human interactions with nature will
       end up with a negative outcome
       Answer to Ahmed's question (Why does humans feel the need to
       draw the distinction between them and nature in the form of
       wilderness?):
       Unlike nature in general, the wilderness is considered dangerous
       and barbaric (uncivilized) because there are no people
       inhabiting there. People nowadays, and in the past, all want to
       be known as civilized persons, therefore they don't want other
       people to connect them with the wilderness. In addition, "wild"
       is sometimes has a depreciating connotation to it which
       describes the person (or thing) uncontrollable - a much more
       pleasing way to say uncivilized.
       My question is: how did the connotation of wilderness become
       what it is now?
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page