DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
US Environmental History Class at CSW
HTML https://cswenvirohistclass.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Mod 5, 2019
*****************************************************
#Post#: 308--------------------------------------------------
Re: Reading 4: New England...
DIR By: nanaafiaba
Date: February 18, 2019, 7:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
To Sofia:
I think that these readings were meant to introduce another
element of environmental history: population. For this reason, I
found these readings to be important. I think they gave us
additional insight into the environment's impact on human
behavior.
#Post#: 309--------------------------------------------------
Re: Reading 4: New England...
DIR By: jbass
Date: February 18, 2019, 8:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I also found it very interesting that there was a notion of land
issues and life before settlers arrived. I was confused at
certain points but it was clear that there is some connection to
the settlers and the state land before and after the arival. The
natives took care of the land and as tribes moved that
responsibility for the land moved as well. This must have had an
effect on the environment and the land around the natives and
the settlers.
#Post#: 310--------------------------------------------------
Re: Reading 4: New England...
DIR By: ebartel2020
Date: February 18, 2019, 8:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
In the first reading, A Disease and Desolate Wilderness Bradford
write about Gods role in environment history (that's my
interpretation I may be incorrect). From my understanding, he
talks about how these individuals have basically nothing and are
in horrible conditions, yet, God had "brought them over the vast
and furious ocean, and delivered them from all the perils and
miseries" (24). I find it interesting because not everyone has
the same beliefs but I feel like in a way the author is asking
the question of: how could they have possibly survived without
the help of God?
#Post#: 311--------------------------------------------------
Re: Reading 4: New England...
DIR By: ngood
Date: February 18, 2019, 8:17 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Misc thoughts:
Bradford suggests that the land is the “proper element” of
humans, not the sea.
For Bradford and Morton, Native Americans are “wild men” and
“Salvages (sic),” respectively.
I noticed several associations of nature with femininity—Morton
compared nature to a virgin on her wedding bed and called up the
image of a “fruitfull wombe” while Krech quoted John Josselyn as
referencing “pregnant valleys.”
RE: Page 96 of Krech
I realize that I’m not used to hearing the people who came to
the New World as immigrants—I’m more used to hearing the terms
“settlers” or “colonists” (though never “colonisers”). I think
this difference is key to how we frame narratives of
colonisation (and to how modern Americans think about history
and about immigration today—if you never hear the term
“immigrant” in relation to the Europeans coming to the New
World, then it’s easier to think of immigration as a relatively
modern pattern in American history).
#Post#: 312--------------------------------------------------
Re: Reading 4: New England...
DIR By: Annaliese
Date: February 18, 2019, 8:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
In “Eden” I found the description of the history of New England
and Massachusetts particularly interesting because even living
in New England, we never really think about the natural
resources here and what makes this area of the country special.
I have never studied the differences in how Native Americans
used land as opposed to European settlers and the impact this
would have on the population of each group. I also thought it
was interesting that even with reports of disease epidemics we
cannot always identify diseases because the people recording
this information did not understand it themselves. They did not
or could not record the number of people who were immune vs the
ones who were susceptible and out of the number who were
susceptible how many were infected. Therefore, they could not
know the effect it had on the overall population.
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 2
DIR Previous Page