URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       US Environmental History Class at CSW
  HTML https://cswenvirohistclass.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Mod 5, 2019
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 291--------------------------------------------------
       Re: #3: Cronon and Merchant Continued...
       By: afreitag Date: February 14, 2019, 8:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Environmental history is an interdisciplinary, revisionist
       history studying the complex, codependent relationship between
       humanity and the environment. It objectively aims to explain
       human phenomenons through environmental settings, and vise
       versa.
       Environmental history is a history of changes and consequences.
       Why is this the way it is? What influenced this? What shaped
       this into what it is?
       I’ve read from other posts the idea that environmental history
       opens a new perspective on development and decline, which can be
       applied to both humanity and the environment. I think this
       aspect specifically is a huge newly realized context with many
       histories to revisit and explore.
       Another important idea in this study is the rejection of
       absolute answers; there are moving parts in this field that
       require ever evolving evaluations. It’s the difference from
       seeing in strictly black and white and seeing through a
       greyscale - which holds a special value in interdisciplinary
       studies.
       I believe this history relies heavily on science, specifically
       scientific documents from which to comb through, as this is a
       new field and does not have its individually dedicated
       historical documents. Scientific documents such as graphs,
       charts, experiments, etc. do not carry the same bias that
       historical documents can, which is another reason why I think it
       is especially important. This history also seems the closest to
       science because environmental happenings cannot be defined or
       explained without a kind of science.
       #Post#: 292--------------------------------------------------
       Re: #3: Cronon and Merchant Continued...
       By: afreitag Date: February 14, 2019, 8:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       reading this reminded me that theology has been pulled into
       environmental history, which I very much hope we will be
       learning more about. Like Diamond was talking about in our first
       night's reading, different areas of the world developed based on
       their environmental means. This could be applied to how
       religions have developed in different regions - and how those
       varying religions can be connected to ethnicity and be
       attributed to wars, specifically over land.
       #Post#: 293--------------------------------------------------
       Re: #3: Cronon and Merchant Continued...
       By: ebartel2020 Date: February 14, 2019, 8:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The way I view environmental history is the relationship and
       interactions that humans have with nature and our understanding
       of ecology. This is a multidisciplinary topic as it involves
       different subtopics such as, the actual environment, how we
       understand the environment and what impact we have on the
       environment. When I say nature, I mean anything not humanly
       made. It is about how we shape the world as well as how the
       world shapes us. In my eyes, we have an issue with culture
       because of the past and in order to change that I think we as a
       whole have to the teacher the younger people the “proper” way of
       thinking. But then, this becomes contradictory because not
       everyone has the same views. I think about this often.
       I appreciated when Cronon talked about how we get stuck in the
       negative due to a negative past. I feel like this sums up much
       of what we do and how we are as humans. As the same time, due to
       science, we thought we knew certain things that we did not and
       it ended up hurting us in the future which is nobody's fault. I
       see that as part of evolution. But, how do we move past certain
       issues when everyone has their own opinions and thoughts?
       #Post#: 294--------------------------------------------------
       Re: #3: Cronon and Merchant Continued...
       By: smartins2019 Date: February 14, 2019, 8:45 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Some thoughts while reading the Merchant reading...
       I love this! Everything about it! Is so! Amazing!
       quotes that really stuck out to me:
       "In interpreting environmental history, therefore, one needs to
       ask probing questions such as: What is race and how is it
       historically and socially constructed at different times and
       places?"
       "African Americans bore the brunt of early forms of
       environmental pollution and disease as whites fled urban areas
       to the new streetcar suburbs. Black neighborhoods became toxic
       dumps and black bodies became toxic sites." 10
       "Over time the meanings attached to skin colors have been
       redefined in ways that reinforce environmental and institutional
       racism." 11
       "But food is also a cultural construct and is therefore not only
       good to eat, but important to people in maintaining historical
       and cultural identities."11
       As for my definition of environmental history, I'm not sure I am
       able to put it into one sentence yet. I know for sure that (at
       this point in time at least) I think it has to do with how has
       the development of the earth impacted people and how has the
       development of people impacted the earth. (Obviously I need to
       find a less-clunky way to say that!)
       #Post#: 295--------------------------------------------------
       Re: #3: Cronon and Merchant Continued...
       By: yzhu2020 Date: February 14, 2019, 8:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Environmental history is the study of history using the earth as
       the primary source of information; it is revisionist because it
       is not using information that past figures have written with the
       intent that it will be part of history and is more inclusive in
       its content. Though environmental history does not view history
       through the conventional perspective (reviewing politics,
       nation-wide events, etc.), it also includes subjects, such as
       gender, race, religion, etc., that is commonly studied in
       conventional history. The goal of environment history is to show
       how nature affects human life. Nature is not limited to only
       plants and organisms, it is also about human society, behavior,
       etc. Therefore it is essential to learn the effect of nature on
       humans. Earth, then, is the perfect source to learn about
       nature; earth is like the foundation of nature. By learning
       about earth, people will learn about nature which leads to a
       deeper understanding of human history.
       #Post#: 296--------------------------------------------------
       Re: #3: Cronon and Merchant Continued...
       By: yzhu2020 Date: February 14, 2019, 9:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Reply to Alice:
       I really liked how you described environment history as a
       history of changes and consequence. I think this is the matter
       of taking and giving. There is always a balance of take and
       give; humans can cause damages to earth but it can also benefit
       the earth as the same time.
       I also really enjoyed your point of how environmental history
       rejects absolute answers. In my perspective, environmental
       history doesn't reject absolute answers it is that there are no
       absolute answers. In environmental history, we study the "why"
       questions not "what" question. With "why" questions, we cannot
       give absolute answers but instead analysis that can provoke even
       more profound thinking and perspective.
       #Post#: 297--------------------------------------------------
       Re: #3: Cronon and Merchant Continued...
       By: Annaliese Date: February 15, 2019, 12:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Environmental history is the study of history by looking at how
       the environment influences every part of culture and humanity
       and what we think we know about history. It seeks to understand
       how the human experience is impacted by nature and natural
       constraints. It is a revisionist history attempt to make history
       more inclusive in its narratives in order to understand it
       better. Environmental history is about the way humanity
       interacts with nature, how we have changed nature and how nature
       has changed us and our culture. It increases our understanding
       of the past by looking at how these natural factors impact us.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page