URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 152730--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Quins lost the plot on modern refereeing?
   DIR By: RodneyRegis
       Date: April 11, 2026, 5:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: JammyGit link ---
       >
       > There really isn't the technology to do that properly, we're
       miles away from it. It would also be expensive and limited to
       the very top of the game so would just widen the gap between
       that and the rest, which isn't a good thing.
       >
       > Largely what people really want is consistency from refs and
       between refs. The actual accuracy of the calls is often
       extremely subjective.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Forward passes could definitely be done with a chip or video.
       Grounding with a chip. Offside not yet as too many people to
       analyse. Would absolutely be prohibitively expensive though.
       #Post#: 152732--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Quins lost the plot on modern refereeing?
   DIR By: JammyGit
       Date: April 11, 2026, 6:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Not sure a chip would conclusively prove a grounding. Forward
       passes, well, we were told a few years ago that the tech was
       being trialled, but I guess that didn't work out.
       #Post#: 152734--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Quins lost the plot on modern refereeing?
   DIR By: Yareet
       Date: April 11, 2026, 9:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: JammyGit link ---
       >
       >
       > Largely what people really want is consistency from refs and
       between refs  as long as it's in favour of their team. The
       actual accuracy of the calls is often extremely subjective.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 152736--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Quins lost the plot on modern refereeing?
   DIR By: JammyGit
       Date: April 11, 2026, 1:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Yareet link ---
       >
       >
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       
       I meant what I said. You can't stop fans being one eyed but the
       levels of frustration are down to how inconsistent it can be
       #Post#: 152737--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Quins lost the plot on modern refereeing?
   DIR By: A222Quin
       Date: April 11, 2026, 3:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: poorfour link ---
       >
       > TV commentators are generally very circumspect about
       criticising the ref’s calls; they know the level of abuse refs
       can get and it’s very rare that they outright disagree with a
       call - even if they’ve been advocating for something different
       before the decision is given.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Most yes… but, you heard Healey recently? He spends half the
       game questioning every reffing decision. Often wrongly!
       #Post#: 152751--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Quins lost the plot on modern refereeing?
   DIR By: poorfour
       Date: April 12, 2026, 11:54 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: JammyGit link ---
       >
       > Not sure a chip would conclusively prove a grounding. Forward
       passes, well, we were told a few years ago that the tech was
       being trialled, but I guess that didn't work out.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       It was trialled at the JRWC (in 22 or 23, IIRC) and it seemed to
       work well from a technical point of view. There were fewer
       forward passes called, and more not straight lineouts.
       But I suspect that what it actually showed was that the
       difference in the accuracy of refs’ calls was marginal enough
       that it wasn’t cost effective to roll it out.
       And, once again for those who can’t get their head around it,
       the speed a ball can be passed and the speed a player can run
       are both ~10m/s.
       The forward speed of the ball will be the [speed of the player]
       - [the backwards component of the speed of the pass]. Since
       players don’t pass the ball directly backwards, the maximum
       backwards component for a player moving at speed will always be
       less than the forward momentum they impart to the ball by
       running.
       The ball ALWAYS goes forward, but sometimes a pass looks more
       forward than others, which is why the most reliable measure is
       looking at the hands.
       #Post#: 152753--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Quins lost the plot on modern refereeing?
   DIR By: Rugbycat
       Date: April 12, 2026, 12:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Smart ball trials are still happening.
  HTML https://www.sixnationsrugby.com/en/m6n/news/smart-ball-to-deliver-groundbreaking-touchfinder-in-six-nations
  HTML https://www.theguardian.com/sport/no-helmets-required/2024/nov/16/smartball-has-revolutionised-data-in-rugby-and-refereeing-could-be-next#:~:text=Technology's%20nuanced%20relationship%20with%20referees,reliably%20adjudicate%20on%20either%20incident.
       #Post#: 152761--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Quins lost the plot on modern refereeing?
   DIR By: deadlyfrom5yardsout
       Date: April 13, 2026, 3:10 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Its not that I can't get my head round it, its just that in my
       day the backs were very rarely running fast enough for
       "momentum" to come into the issue. Think of what I am saying as
       a backwards banana pass rather than a flat pass that bananas
       forward.
       #Post#: 152765--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Quins lost the plot on modern refereeing?
   DIR By: never sleep
       Date: April 13, 2026, 7:54 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: deadlyfrom5yardsout link ---
       >
       > Its not that I can't get my head round it, its just that in my
       day the backs were very rarely running fast enough for
       "momentum" to come into the issue. Think of what I am saying as
       a backwards banana pass rather than a flat pass that bananas
       forward.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       If you watch this video
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXUdGPjJHkc
       Freeze frame at 0:59 seconds
       And then at 1:00
       You can clearly see that the player who catches the ball is in
       ultimately ahead of the passing player.
       This isn't new.
       #Post#: 152767--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Have Quins lost the plot on modern refereeing?
   DIR By: Quinten Poulsen
       Date: April 13, 2026, 8:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes but in Deadly's day they still played with a pig's bladder
       and with up to 300 players on each side, and the pitch was a
       cobbled road betwixt Slattern Aleye and Mufflers Reap.
       *****************************************************
       Page 4 of 5
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page