URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 147612--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Realistic transfer targets
   DIR By: JammyGit
       Date: January 9, 2026, 5:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I didn't watch the game, but... they lost 50% of their scrums
       and Collier conceded 2 pens which I assume happened at scrum
       time, soooooooo I dunno about smashing it against Bath?
       He was a fabulous scrummager and I'd love to see him back at the
       club, mind.
       #Post#: 147613--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Realistic transfer targets
   DIR By: Quinaldo
       Date: January 10, 2026, 3:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The more i think about it, the more i agree that Cotter would be
       perfect for us. As people have said: he has a hard nosed edge to
       him, but also likes to play an expansive style of rugby.
       Basically exactly what we are asking for. Throw the cheque book
       at him!
       #Post#: 147614--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Realistic transfer targets
   DIR By: Quinston Churchill
       Date: January 10, 2026, 6:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       100% I’m definitely trying to manifest it. The article was
       interview with Cotter so the interest in the Premiership was a
       direct t quote not total speculation.
       According to Neil Fissler (so take with a pinch of salt), Ronan
       O’Gara is potentially leaving La Rochelle. I wouldn’t choose him
       (I don’t like him or his brand of rugby) but he could be an
       attractive option for Newcastle or Gloucester.
       #Post#: 147616--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Realistic transfer targets
   DIR By: Rugbycat
       Date: January 10, 2026, 6:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Quinston Churchill link ---
       >
       > 100% I’m definitely trying to manifest it. The article was
       interview with Cotter so the interest in the Premiership was a
       direct t quote not total speculation.
       >
       > According to Neil Fissler (so take with a pinch of salt),
       Ronan O’Gara is potentially leaving La Rochelle. I wouldn’t
       choose him (I don’t like him or his brand of rugby) but he could
       be an attractive option for Newcastle or Gloucester.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       O’Gara sees his next job as being at international level, of
       course if he is sacked by La Rochelle that would probably force
       his hand and make him take a club job.
  HTML https://www.rugbypass.com/plus/there-is-only-one-irish-job-that-ronan-ogara-desires-and-it-is-not-leinster/
       #Post#: 147621--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Realistic transfer targets
   DIR By: Quinky
       Date: January 10, 2026, 1:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: KentQuin link ---
       >
       > I suspect Red Bull can offer more cash than we can...
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       But it would mean living in Newcastle. Living in it near London
       is quite a draw for many people.
       #Post#: 147741--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Realistic transfer targets
   DIR By: mrpj1985
       Date: January 12, 2026, 10:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It's a lengthy one of amateur musings, so apologies if this
       TLDR.
       However, after watching yesterday, I got to thinking that rather
       than positions, we need to focus on profiles.
       We've seen a lot of mention of the squad for next year being
       smaller too.
       Say we took it down to 35, what would the makeup of that be? Are
       we planning on always being a 6-2 on the bench?
       We'd definitely need more versatility in the backs, for example.
       Outside of front row, in the back 5 of the scrum, we seemingly
       want (as with most other teams) -
       Big units, unafraid of contact (Dun/C-S)
       Spoilers (Petti/Evans/Kenningham)
       Carriers comfortable in space and close contact (Dombrandt/Carr)
       In the backs, outside of halfbacks -
       Big carrying centre who can cover 12/13 (Waghorn)
       Centre who can cover wing (Beard)
       At least one wing comfortable chasing (Isgro)
       At least one wing with serious wheels (Murley/Cleaves)
       2nd playmaker at FB (Furbank)
       Where we currently stand, in my opinion, on each role -
       Forwards
       Hooker - We have Turner, Walker, Riley, Musk, with Dorey-Palmer
       probably aging out of his academy contract. None of them set the
       world alight, but whichever 2/3 you keep probably reflect which
       type of profile you want to complete it, but a new senior type
       seems needed.
       Props - Wenger & Baxter make a good pair for Loosehead,
       Delgado's done enough for at least 1 of the TH spots. Williams
       hasn't embarrassed himself, but he's old and not elite. Is
       Hobson now permanently a LH, or is he there in a pinch given our
       injury problems. Definite need for clarity.
       Units - Dun's coming in, Treadwell's there, Green is developing,
       C-S on his day is a star.
       Spoliers - Kenningham, WEV, Petti all great. Would be a big punt
       to promote Elliott Williams at 19, but as a squad option that we
       have high hopes for it might fit the role well.
       Carriers - Dombrandt as club captain, Zach Carr as impact man
       off the bench and successor. Probably could easily bring in
       another veteran, or keep one of Lawday/Chisholm. As well as
       that, the wheels on both Dombrandt and Carr could mean they
       could cover 12 in a 6/2 bench situation.
       Backs -
       Scrum half - Porter & Friday, with one more senior scrum half.
       Could easily be Townsend.
       Fly half - Obvious Marcus is key and king. Being back-up is both
       essential and tricky. I think Jarrod will probably head back to
       Wales, Benson may well see his future elsewhere. Would be great
       to see Slevin and Bellamy get some Prem minutes to see if they
       can cover 10/15.
       Centres - Waghorn and Beard seem quite set here, but definitely
       need another strong carrying 12, who can go to 13. Sean Kerr as
       a goalkicking centre who can cover fly half and full back does
       have some serious utility as well.
       Wingers - Cleaves, Isgro and Murley are a good trio.
       Full back - Furbank (if fit) is seemingly replacing Green.
       After all that, I'd probably say (outside of Dun and Furbank),
       the holes that need clarity (not necessarily new blood) -
       3rd Loosehead behind Wenger/Baxter
       Hooker
       Tighthead alongside Delgado.
       Another carrier alongside Carr + Dombrandt. Could be internal
       (Chisholm/Schmid)
       3rd SH behind Porter and Friday
       Big carrying 12.
       In terms of priorities/needs, I'd rank them -
       Big carrying 12 - Made my feelings on Tabuova clear earlier on,
       but given we only sign Argentines as overseas players and we
       should have the budget in this scenario, let's go for Chocobares
       [emoji1]
       Clarity around hooker - Maybe go for Ruiz from Perpignan. Make
       it an all Argentine front row as a unit, he did well at Irish as
       well.
       2nd TH (assuming Williams was on a 1yr deal) - If Williams
       leaves and Sinckler wants to push for 2027, why not bring him
       home.
       The others are squad positions, in all likelihood, so probably
       can keep some of the older guard, or promote from the academy.
       If we went in to the year with a 35 man squad of -
       Forwards (21)
       LHP (3) - Baxter/Wenger/Els
       HK (3) - Walker/Ruiz/Dorey-Palmer
       THP (4) - Sinckler/Delgado/Hobson/Streeter
       Units (4) - Dun/C-S/Treadwell/Green
       Spoilers (4) - Kenningham/Petti/Evans/E.Williams
       Carriers (3) - Dombrandt/Carr/Chisholm
       Backs (14)
       SH (3) - Porter/Friday/Townsend
       FH (2) - Smith/Slevin
       C (4) - Chocobares/Beard/Waghorn/Kerr
       W (3) - Murley/Isgro/Cleaves
       FB (2) - Furbank/Bellamy
       Think we'd be playing with a lot more clarity if we focused on
       roles. It also allows for the Academy side and loan programs to
       be built around that as well.
       Just some thoughts and appreciate the "best case scenario" on
       the 3 signings I put there, but that's where I think we should
       be framing our thinking for next year and the recent years to
       come.
       #Post#: 147743--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Realistic transfer targets
   DIR By: Yareet
       Date: January 12, 2026, 11:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: mrpj1985 link ---
       >
       > It's a lengthy one of amateur musings, so apologies if this
       TLDR.
       >
       > However, after watching yesterday, I got to thinking that
       rather than positions, we need to focus on profiles.
       >
       > We've seen a lot of mention of the squad for next year being
       smaller too.
       > Say we took it down to 35, what would the makeup of that be?
       Are we planning on always being a 6-2 on the bench?
       > We'd definitely need more versatility in the backs, for
       example.
       >
       > Outside of front row, in the back 5 of the scrum, we seemingly
       want (as with most other teams) -
       > Big units, unafraid of contact (Dun/C-S)
       > Spoilers (Petti/Evans/Kenningham)
       > Carriers comfortable in space and close contact
       (Dombrandt/Carr)
       >
       > In the backs, outside of halfbacks -
       > Big carrying centre who can cover 12/13 (Waghorn)
       > Centre who can cover wing (Beard)
       > At least one wing comfortable chasing (Isgro)
       > At least one wing with serious wheels (Murley/Cleaves)
       > 2nd playmaker at FB (Furbank)
       >
       > Where we currently stand, in my opinion, on each role -
       >
       > Forwards
       >
       > Hooker - We have Turner, Walker, Riley, Musk, with
       Dorey-Palmer probably aging out of his academy contract. None of
       them set the world alight, but whichever 2/3 you keep probably
       reflect which type of profile you want to complete it, but a new
       senior type seems needed.
       >
       > Props - Wenger & Baxter make a good pair for Loosehead,
       Delgado's done enough for at least 1 of the TH spots. Williams
       hasn't embarrassed himself, but he's old and not elite. Is
       Hobson now permanently a LH, or is he there in a pinch given our
       injury problems. Definite need for clarity.
       >
       > Units - Dun's coming in, Treadwell's there, Green is
       developing, C-S on his day is a star.
       >
       > Spoliers - Kenningham, WEV, Petti all great. Would be a big
       punt to promote Elliott Williams at 19, but as a squad option
       that we have high hopes for it might fit the role well.
       >
       > Carriers - Dombrandt as club captain, Zach Carr as impact man
       off the bench and successor. Probably could easily bring in
       another veteran, or keep one of Lawday/Chisholm. As well as
       that, the wheels on both Dombrandt and Carr could mean they
       could cover 12 in a 6/2 bench situation.
       >
       > Backs -
       >
       >
       > Scrum half - Porter & Friday, with one more senior scrum half.
       Could easily be Townsend.
       >
       > Fly half - Obvious Marcus is key and king. Being back-up is
       both essential and tricky. I think Jarrod will probably head
       back to Wales, Benson may well see his future elsewhere. Would
       be great to see Slevin and Bellamy get some Prem minutes to see
       if they can cover 10/15.
       >
       > Centres - Waghorn and Beard seem quite set here, but
       definitely need another strong carrying 12, who can go to 13.
       Sean Kerr as a goalkicking centre who can cover fly half and
       full back does have some serious utility as well.
       >
       > Wingers - Cleaves, Isgro and Murley are a good trio.
       >
       > Full back - Furbank (if fit) is seemingly replacing Green.
       >
       > After all that, I'd probably say (outside of Dun and Furbank),
       the holes that need clarity (not necessarily new blood) -
       > 3rd Loosehead behind Wenger/Baxter
       > Hooker
       > Tighthead alongside Delgado.
       > Another carrier alongside Carr + Dombrandt. Could be internal
       (Chisholm/Schmid)
       > 3rd SH behind Porter and Friday
       > Big carrying 12.
       >
       > In terms of priorities/needs, I'd rank them -
       > Big carrying 12 - Made my feelings on Tabuova clear earlier
       on, but given we only sign Argentines as overseas players and we
       should have the budget in this scenario, let's go for Chocobares
       [emoji1]
       > Clarity around hooker - Maybe go for Ruiz from Perpignan. Make
       it an all Argentine front row as a unit, he did well at Irish as
       well.
       > 2nd TH (assuming Williams was on a 1yr deal) - If Williams
       leaves and Sinckler wants to push for 2027, why not bring him
       home.
       >
       > The others are squad positions, in all likelihood, so probably
       can keep some of the older guard, or promote from the academy.
       >
       > If we went in to the year with a 35 man squad of -
       >
       > Forwards (21)
       > LHP (3) - Baxter/Wenger/Els
       > HK (3) - Walker/Ruiz/Dorey-Palmer
       > THP (4) - Sinckler/Delgado/Hobson/Streeter
       > Units (4) - Dun/C-S/Treadwell/Green
       > Spoilers (4) - Kenningham/Petti/Evans/E.Williams
       > Carriers (3) - Dombrandt/Carr/Chisholm
       >
       > Backs (14)
       > SH (3) - Porter/Friday/Townsend
       > FH (2) - Smith/Slevin
       > C (4) - Chocobares/Beard/Waghorn/Kerr
       > W (3) - Murley/Isgro/Cleaves
       > FB (2) - Furbank/Bellamy
       >
       > Think we'd be playing with a lot more clarity if we focused on
       roles. It also allows for the Academy side and loan programs to
       be built around that as well.
       >
       > Just some thoughts and appreciate the "best case scenario" on
       the 3 signings I put there, but that's where I think we should
       be framing our thinking for next year and the recent years to
       come.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Did you mean to bin off Northmore?
       #Post#: 147745--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Realistic transfer targets
   DIR By: TomBuckQuin
       Date: January 12, 2026, 11:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If it's a squad of 35 senior players, I would hope it looks more
       like this:
       LH Prop: Baxter, Wenger, Hobson
       Hooker: [New Signing], Walker, Riley
       TH Prop: Delgado, [New Signing], Streeter
       Lock: [New Signing - Kpoku please!], Petti, Treadwell, Dun, E.
       Williams (sign him up to a senior contract right now - he's a
       BIG boy)
       BS Flanker: CCS, Carr
       OS Flanker: Kenningham, Evans
       Number 8: Dombrandt, Lawday
       Scrum-Half: Porter, Friday, [New Signing]
       Fly-Half: Smith, Benson
       Centre: [New Signing], Waghorn, Bradley, Northmore, Beard (and
       just play Bradley/Waghorn at 12!)
       Wing: Murley, Isgro, Cleaves, [New Signing - an aerial wing who
       can also play FB]
       Full Back: Furbank
       #Post#: 147747--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Realistic transfer targets
   DIR By: Brown Bottle
       Date: January 12, 2026, 11:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Yareet link ---
       >
       > Did you mean to bin off Northmore?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Did you really quote the whole of that mammoth post just to ask
       that?
       #Post#: 147748--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Realistic transfer targets
   DIR By: Rugbycat
       Date: January 12, 2026, 12:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You are pushing it a bit with 35 players, you probably need
       39-40 and 30-35 senior academy players, only having two 10's is
       not a good idea, even if we sign furbank, and three 9's is also
       one too few.
       We need to be more sensible about letting players go, who are
       past their sell by date and releasing academy players who are
       not going to make it, if your academy has good players then
       perhaps you could have 35, but it is a push, look at the list of
       currently unavailable players and deduct that from 35.
       Our problem recently has been keeping players past their prime
       and likely getting high wages, and losing good young players,
       but players are always going to leave no matter what.
       *****************************************************
       Page 5 of 9
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page