URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 145541--------------------------------------------------
       Re: o/t RWC draw for 2027
   DIR By: Rugbycat
       Date: December 3, 2025, 12:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: FrostAndFire link ---
       >
       > Request for Wales to not actually get good until after the
       world cup.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I really don't think there is any danger of that happening.
       #Post#: 145542--------------------------------------------------
       Re: o/t RWC draw for 2027
   DIR By: poorfour
       Date: December 3, 2025, 12:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: T-Bone link ---
       >
       > Who will Ireland be losing to in the 1/4s?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Well, their most likely opponents are Argentina - whose QF
       record is almost as good as Ireland's is dire.
       #Post#: 145544--------------------------------------------------
       Re: o/t RWC draw for 2027
   DIR By: Bod
       Date: December 3, 2025, 1:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: euroquin link ---
       >
       > For the knockout stage, if results go as you might expect then
       I think England could face Italy in the last 16, Australia in
       the quarter final and then Ireland/Argentina? SA, NZ and France
       all in the other half of the draw...
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I'd be happy to lay a tenner with you that it'll be Georgia, not
       Italy
       [emoji4]
       #Post#: 145548--------------------------------------------------
       Re: o/t RWC draw for 2027
   DIR By: Rugbycat
       Date: December 3, 2025, 6:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Bod link ---
       >
       > I'd be happy to lay a tenner with you that it'll be Georgia,
       not Italy
       > [emoji4]
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       The Italians beat them last year, and seem to be improving,
       Georgia is falling into political instability, and as their
       rugby program relies heavily on a pro Russian billionaire, you
       have to wonder about the future of the place, testing
       experimental chemical weapons on the pro European Union
       protesters is not a good look.
       Rugby may soon be the least of their concerns.
       #Post#: 145552--------------------------------------------------
       Re: o/t RWC draw for 2027
   DIR By: dawson9
       Date: December 4, 2025, 5:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Cant see Georgia getting close to this Italy team - who are
       improving all the time. They gave RSA a better fight than most
       of the top tier nations did this autumn, and have beaten Aus
       twice in a row. Cant see Georgia getting anywhere near them.
       Personally I hate this new format - almost no real jeopardy in
       the groups - with zero chance of an 'England 15' or 'Australia
       24' happening - every tier 1 and 2 team will be through to the
       last 16, and you'll have a handful of tier 3 teams into the
       knockouts who will have likely won 1 game of 3 - will be a race
       for 'who can concede the least beating by tier 1 nations to
       qualify'. I get there will be jeopardy in terms of who faces who
       in the last 16, but its just rubbish compared to the traditional
       format
       #Post#: 145559--------------------------------------------------
       Re: o/t RWC draw for 2027
   DIR By: Rugbycat
       Date: December 4, 2025, 7:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Expanding to 24 teams has really made the logistics of the draw
       difficult, 32 would be much easier to manage, but you would be
       scraping the bottom of the barrel for teams, or perhaps 20 teams
       in 4 groups of 5 and top two going through.
       But the world rugby let’s go to 24 teams and have a 16 teams
       qualifying, has meant that the seeding is only really for the
       group stage and then it become luck of the draw after that.
       #Post#: 145560--------------------------------------------------
       Re: o/t RWC draw for 2027
   DIR By: Yareet
       Date: December 4, 2025, 7:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Rugbycat link ---
       >
       > Expanding to 24 teams has really made the logistics of the
       draw difficult, 32 would be much easier to manage, but you would
       be scraping the bottom of the barrel for teams, or perhaps 20
       teams in 4 groups of 5 and top two going through.
       >
       > But the world rugby let’s go to 24 teams and have a 16 teams
       qualifying, has meant that the seeding is only really for the
       group stage and then it become luck of the draw after that.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Some (mainly not in England) would argue that the 20 teams in
       2023 resulted in some luck of the draw
       #Post#: 145564--------------------------------------------------
       Re: o/t RWC draw for 2027
   DIR By: deadlyfrom5yardsout
       Date: December 4, 2025, 8:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: dawson9 link ---
       >
       > Cant see Georgia getting close to this Italy team - who are
       improving all the time. They gave RSA a better fight than most
       of the top tier nations did this autumn, and have beaten Aus
       twice in a row. Cant see Georgia getting anywhere near them.
       >
       > Personally I hate this new format - almost no real jeopardy in
       the groups - with zero chance of an 'England 15' or 'Australia
       24' happening - every tier 1 and 2 team will be through to the
       last 16, and you'll have a handful of tier 3 teams into the
       knockouts who will have likely won 1 game of 3 - will be a race
       for 'who can concede the least beating by tier 1 nations to
       qualify'. I get there will be jeopardy in terms of who faces who
       in the last 16, but its just rubbish compared to the traditional
       format
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       One positive is that Rugby will get some useful exposure in the
       Tier 3 Nations, which is kind of the point of the exercise,
       n'est ce pas?
       #Post#: 145565--------------------------------------------------
       Re: o/t RWC draw for 2027
   DIR By: Rugbycat
       Date: December 4, 2025, 10:05 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Yareet link ---
       >
       > Some (mainly not in England) would argue that the 20 teams in
       2023 resulted in some luck of the draw
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       You really need 16 or 32 anything else has greater or lesser
       luck of the draw, and means that you can’t guarantee to keep the
       top 2 ranked teams on different sides of the draw.
       Both draws have worked out pretty well for England, but it works
       for me, with the draw so far ahead the rankings are going to be
       different anyway.
       #Post#: 145570--------------------------------------------------
       Re: o/t RWC draw for 2027
   DIR By: Yareet
       Date: December 4, 2025, 10:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Rugbycat link ---
       >
       > You really need 16 or 32 anything else has greater or lesser
       luck of the draw, and means that you can’t guarantee to keep the
       top 2 ranked teams on different sides of the draw.
       >
       > Both draws have worked out pretty well for England, but it
       works for me, with the draw so far ahead the rankings are going
       to be different anyway.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       16 could still give you an element of the draw having an impact.
       The nature of a draw is that there is a random element and that
       means luck is involved. Plus the difference in standard between
       the top 10 and everyone else (and even within the top 10) is so
       stark. Would Fiji, Scotland or Italy (8-10 in the current
       rankings) beat SA or NZ?
       Unless we either go down to 8-10 teams (not exactly growing the
       game) or start creating pools based solely on rankings at the
       time the competition actually starts (which is completely
       unfeasible), there is always the always the chance that draw
       will be kinder to some.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page