URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 144904--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cover tackler?
   DIR By: FrostAndFire
       Date: November 19, 2025, 3:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: TomBuckQuin link ---
       >
       > "Very little deviation" = clearly changes his line to the left
       to take out the chasing defender?
       >
       > See:
  HTML https://youtu.be/FN97ErIUEH0?si=_AXdbF65SCOwVd71&t=406
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Or keeps enough distance to be a viable option if a pass is
       needed?
       #Post#: 144906--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cover tackler?
   DIR By: Banstead Quin
       Date: November 19, 2025, 4:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Yareet link ---
       >
       > I think that's a little harsh. He's only had one year as a
       senior player. In that time, he's had the opportunity to win 5
       competitions. He was in the team that won the biggest
       international competition he was part of and made the final of
       the biggest club competition. By the end of this week, he'll
       hopefully also have been part of the team that does an Autumn
       clean sweep.
       >
       > It's not bad going and I'm struggling to think of many kids
       who've had a better first year.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       For sure he's been involved in a big year and had some standout
       moments that he should be proud of and it looks like as long as
       he carries on the way he is with the pressure of being him and
       what's about to hit him then we can all own him as an
       Englishman. I'm not as 'super excited' as most about him as I've
       seen too many false dawns of the new messiah and want him to
       have a chance to learn and grow without the weight of the world
       on his shoulders.
       If he consistently makes 15+ plus tackles, wins turnovers,
       scores a try a game and involved in 2 or 3 others for the team
       then brilliant. Let's see how he responds to a dip in form,
       should one happen and see then. We all look brilliant when
       everything is going our way.
       #Post#: 144919--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cover tackler?
   DIR By: TomBuckQuin
       Date: November 19, 2025, 9:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: FrostAndFire link ---
       >
       > Or keeps enough distance to be a viable option if a pass is
       needed?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       To be a viable option he'd need to be behind the player passing,
       which he only was as Roebuck flopped over the line (and only
       because he got bumped backwards in the contact he made with the
       NZ defender). Also, I thought you already established a pass
       wouldn't be needed because there was - and I quote - "no chance
       the covering tackler would have made it there"? Your argument
       has holes all over it - but that's because you know he ran
       across the defender and should have been pinged.
       It's really not a big deal though in this case, like I said
       before - wouldn't have changed the outcome of the game either
       way. But hopefully the coaches had a word with him to nip it in
       the bud so he doesn't have brainfarts like that in future that
       do have consequences for the team.
       It's obvious he's got the potential to be a player that
       generations look back on as one of the (if not the) best in the
       world... but the self-confidence he has does need to be
       controlled so it doesn't stray into arrogance and complacence.
       If he can rein in silly moments like the above then we're in for
       a treat.
       #Post#: 144921--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cover tackler?
   DIR By: Yareet
       Date: November 19, 2025, 9:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: TomBuckQuin link ---
       >
       > To be a viable option he'd need to be behind the player
       passing, which he only was as Roebuck flopped over the line (and
       only because he got bumped backwards in the contact he made with
       the NZ defender). Also, I thought you already established a pass
       wouldn't be needed because there was - and I quote - "no chance
       the covering tackler would have made it there"? Your argument
       has holes all over it - but that's because you know he ran
       across the defender and should have been pinged.
       >
       > It's really not a big deal though in this case, like I said
       before - wouldn't have changed the outcome of the game either
       way. But hopefully the coaches had a word with him to nip it in
       the bud so he doesn't have brainfarts like that in future that
       do have consequences for the team.
       >
       > It's obvious he's got the potential to be a player that
       generations look back on as one of the (if not the) best in the
       world... but the self-confidence he has does need to be
       controlled so it doesn't stray into arrogance and complacence.
       If he can rein in silly moments like the above then we're in for
       a treat.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       In his defence, he got away with it twice in that game. The
       nature of backrow play is to play to the ref.
       #Post#: 144925--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cover tackler?
   DIR By: FrostAndFire
       Date: November 19, 2025, 10:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: TomBuckQuin link ---
       >
       > To be a viable option he'd need to be behind the player
       passing, which he only was as Roebuck flopped over the line (and
       only because he got bumped backwards in the contact he made with
       the NZ defender). Also, I thought you already established a pass
       wouldn't be needed because there was - and I quote - "no chance
       the covering tackler would have made it there"? Your argument
       has holes all over it - but that's because you know he ran
       across the defender and should have been pinged.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Nope. My argument is that he wasn't needed for a pass. However,
       if I conceded that the covering tackler would have made it
       (which I don't), then he still wouldn't be giving up a penalty
       as he would be a passing option.
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 3
   DIR Previous Page