URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 131345--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Quins - good or not? - here are some stats
   DIR By: Brown Bottle
       Date: December 10, 2024, 4:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: never sleep link ---
       >
       > Here are the combos
       >
       > Sale
       > Newcastle Marcus+Lenny+Northmore
       > Saints JEv+Lenny+Joseph
       > Sarries Smith+Lenny+Beard
       > Bath Smith+Nortmore+Beard
       > Chiefs JEv+Lenny+Beard
       > Bristol Jev+Nortmore+Beard
       > R92 Smith+Lenny+Northmore
       >
       > We haven't used the same 3 players twice.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Actually we have but you've craftily used Marcus and Smith.
       😁
       #Post#: 131346--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Quins - good or not? - here are some stats
   DIR By: never sleep
       Date: December 10, 2024, 4:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Brown Bottle link ---
       >
       > Actually we have but you've craftily used Marcus and Smith.
       😁
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Oops - yes you are right
       #Post#: 131351--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Quins - good or not? - here are some stats
   DIR By: thatchapcarnell
       Date: December 10, 2024, 5:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Not ideal though is it? A very unsettled midfield.
       Smith, Andre, Marchant was absolutely the first choice but I'm
       not sure we really know the best combination at the moment
       anyway.
       9 Porter
       10 Smith
       11 Murley
       12 Anyanwu
       13 Northmore
       14 Isgro
       15 Green
       Is this our best backline? How many times has that combination
       actually featured? Beard gets hard done by here too but I guess
       something has to give.
       #Post#: 131353--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Quins - good or not? - here are some stats
   DIR By: never sleep
       Date: December 10, 2024, 5:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: thatchapcarnell link ---
       >
       > Not ideal though is it? A very unsettled midfield.
       >
       > Smith, Andre, Marchant was absolutely the first choice but I'm
       not sure we really know the best combination at the moment
       anyway.
       >
       > 9 Porter
       > 10 Smith
       > 11 Murley
       > 12 Anyanwu
       > 13 Northmore
       > 14 Isgro
       > 15 Green
       >
       > Is this our best backline? How many times has that combination
       actually featured? Beard gets hard done by here too but I guess
       something has to give.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       In the 2 games where we had Smith+Lenny+Luke, we had:
       Falcons - Porter, Smith, Cleaves, Anyanwu, Northmore, David,
       Halfpenny
       R92      - Porter, Smith, David   , Anyanwu, Northmore, Murley,
       Halfpenny
       I think that the Murley+Green+Isgro combo has only featured
       twice. Chiefs + Bath. In those games, Isgro scored 3 tries and
       Murley 1.
       #Post#: 131369--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Quins - good or not? - here are some stats
   DIR By: RodneyRegis
       Date: December 11, 2024, 3:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Second most tackles is not a good stat...
       #Post#: 131371--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Quins - good or not? - here are some stats
   DIR By: thatchapcarnell
       Date: December 11, 2024, 3:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: RodneyRegis link ---
       >
       > Second most tackles is not a good stat...
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Depends, no?
       You don't want to be endlessly tackling the opposition by
       letting them have the lion's share of possession as it is
       exhausting.
       But better to tackle than not and shows defence is working
       hard...?
       #Post#: 131373--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Quins - good or not? - here are some stats
   DIR By: Quinky
       Date: December 11, 2024, 4:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: thatchapcarnell link ---
       >
       > Depends, no?
       >
       > You don't want to be endlessly tackling the opposition by
       letting them have the lion's share of possession as it is
       exhausting.
       >
       > But better to tackle than not and shows defence is working
       hard...?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Missed tackles would be an interesting stat. But the high number
       of tackles could mean that we're defending well enough that the
       oppo are attacking but not scoring.
       #Post#: 131374--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Quins - good or not? - here are some stats
   DIR By: championes
       Date: December 11, 2024, 4:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Quinky link ---
       >
       > Missed tackles would be an interesting stat. But the high
       number of tackles could mean that we're defending well enough
       that the oppo are attacking but not scoring.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Opta stats put our tackle success at 87.7%.
       % of missed tackles leading to breaks - 12.6%
       % of missed tackles leading to try - 10.7%
       % missed where player was tackled (eg falling off) - 76.8%
       Now again, we have to speculate wildly about what is actually
       happening on the pitch here -- but looking at the teams at the
       top....
       % missed where player was tackled
       Quins - 76.8%
       Bath - 64.2%
       Bears - 64.4%
       Tigers - 64.9%
       Saracens - 66.7%
       Now this is the bit that's simply guesswork based on those stats
       -- but if you're attempting a tackle to the point where it's
       nearly completed that's you taken out of the defensive line
       (probably).
       So it might be that our failure to complete these tackles more
       than others is happening at crucial moments allowing line breaks
       etc...but again we just can't tell from this.
       It is interesting that we have this gap compared to others when
       most of the other stats are roughly similar.
       And now i've checked the bottom....
       Saints (66.2%) Falcons (69.3%), Chiefs (69.5%)
       So we are in fact the most likely in the league to get hold of
       someone in a tackle but fail to complete, according to this
       stat.
       #Post#: 131375--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Quins - good or not? - here are some stats
   DIR By: poorfour
       Date: December 11, 2024, 5:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Isn't that a function of how we defend? We tend to go with a
       fast defensive line with at least one player - often Marcus -
       rushing up to disrupt the passing lanes. That player quite often
       makes a partial tackle that the ball carrier breaks, but they
       then get stopped on or near the defensive line. The system
       doesn't care if the first tackle is missed, as long as it keeps
       the ball from getting wide.
       #Post#: 131376--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Quins - good or not? - here are some stats
   DIR By: championes
       Date: December 11, 2024, 6:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: poorfour link ---
       >
       > Isn't that a function of how we defend? We tend to go with a
       fast defensive line with at least one player - often Marcus -
       rushing up to disrupt the passing lanes. That player quite often
       makes a partial tackle that the ball carrier breaks, but they
       then get stopped on or near the defensive line. The system
       doesn't care if the first tackle is missed, as long as it keeps
       the ball from getting wide.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Yes could well be
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 6
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page