URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 118772--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marchant to Sarries
   DIR By: Quinston Churchill
       Date: January 21, 2024, 5:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: T-Bone link ---
       >
       > That would be unforgivable
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I’d be happy enough to see him back in the Premiership for
       literally any other side but some things you just don’t do …
       #Post#: 118773--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marchant to Sarries
   DIR By: FatQuin
       Date: January 21, 2024, 5:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Great player but we haven’t missed him.  Up to him where he
       plays and he knows it will go down like a lead balloon with most
       Quins fans.  Looks like (understandably) that’s not his main
       priority.
       #Post#: 118775--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marchant to Sarries
   DIR By: RodneyRegis
       Date: January 21, 2024, 6:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: FatQuin link ---
       >
       > Great player but we haven’t missed him.  Up to him where he
       plays and he knows it will go down like a lead balloon with most
       Quins fans.  Looks like (understandably) that’s not his main
       priority.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I'd strongly disagree. Look at yesterday's game - ulster
       repeatedly broke our midfield in broken play yesterday. On
       another day that costs us dear. Will Joseph, much as I like him
       ball in hand, is nowhere near marchant in defence, and goes
       missing a bit for me. Beard has been very promising, but I don't
       think anyone would suggest he's Joe's equal in any facet.
       #Post#: 118776--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marchant to Sarries
   DIR By: Quinky
       Date: January 21, 2024, 6:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: RodneyRegis link ---
       >
       > I'd strongly disagree. Look at yesterday's game - ulster
       repeatedly broke our midfield in broken play yesterday. On
       another day that costs us dear. Will Joseph, much as I like him
       ball in hand, is nowhere near marchant in defence, and goes
       missing a bit for me. Beard has been very promising, but I don't
       think anyone would suggest he's Joe's equal in any facet.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Joe is a really special player. Sadly, the England team
       management didn't seem too aware of that. Although I can't help
       thinking that he just happened to excel because of his teammates
       and the way we play. Would he be as effective at Sarries? I
       doubt it, although he'd still be pure quality.
       #Post#: 118782--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marchant to Sarries
   DIR By: FishQuin
       Date: January 21, 2024, 9:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Yareet link ---
       >
       > Still makes no sense….
       > …Completely understandable decision but not the conspiracy
       that some want to see.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I feel like you’re missing the point here.
       Under Jones, Marchant wasn’t being picked. So he did not have
       the carrot of England selection to keep him here.
       Marchant knew it was likely Jones would move on after the World
       Cup, sure. But he had no reason to believe that would also mean
       he would be picked. It’s just as likely the new coach comes in
       and still doesn’t pick him. After all, he’s spent years being in
       and around the squads without ever really getting a chance.
       Then Borthwick comes in and picks him.
       Suddenly Joe has the carrot of England selection. He likely
       believes he has a very good chance of getting picked if he’s in
       England. Because Borthwick has shown a tendency to pick him and
       Borthwick is the England coach.
       So now Marchant wants to come back to England so that he can get
       picked for England.
       Not sure what about that is a conspiracy theory. Seems pretty
       logical.
       #Post#: 118787--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marchant to Sarries
   DIR By: RodneyRegis
       Date: January 21, 2024, 9:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It's not really very logical. He could very easily waited and
       seen what happened if he was only going because of Eddie.
       #Post#: 118791--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marchant to Sarries
   DIR By: FishQuin
       Date: January 21, 2024, 10:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       He could have done. Or he could move on. As I said, he had no
       reason to think he would be picked. Now he has a reason to think
       he will be picked.
       #Post#: 118792--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marchant to Sarries
   DIR By: FishQuin
       Date: January 21, 2024, 10:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: RodneyRegis link ---
       >
       > It's not really very logical.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Person X wants Y and Z.
       Person X wants Y slightly more than Z.
       Y and Z can’t be had simultaneously.
       Person X doesn’t think they can get Y so instead they take Z
       when it is offered.
       After having taken Z, person X learns they can have Y.
       Person X then gives up Z in order to have Y.
       Rodney, please point out where the logic fails in this
       statement.
       Sure, you can argue against my premises. You can’t reasonably
       argue against the logic.
       #Post#: 118793--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marchant to Sarries
   DIR By: FatQuin
       Date: January 21, 2024, 10:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: RodneyRegis link ---
       >
       > I'd strongly disagree. Look at yesterday's game - ulster
       repeatedly broke our midfield in broken play yesterday. On
       another day that costs us dear. Will Joseph, much as I like him
       ball in hand, is nowhere near marchant in defence, and goes
       missing a bit for me. Beard has been very promising, but I don't
       think anyone would suggest he's Joe's equal in any facet.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Yes but it didn’t cost us and it hasn’t so far.  I specifically
       said he’s a great player but, for whatever reason, I’ve not had
       a moment this season where I’ve felt he would have made a
       difference to the outcome of the game. I’m surprised by that but
       pleasantly so.
       #Post#: 118794--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Marchant to Sarries
   DIR By: RodneyRegis
       Date: January 21, 2024, 10:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: FishQuin link ---
       >
       > Person X wants Y and Z.
       > Person X wants Y slightly more than Z.
       > Y and Z can’t be had simultaneously.
       > Person X doesn’t think they can get Y so instead they take Z
       when it is offered.
       > After having taken Z, person X learns they can have Y.
       > Person X then gives up Z in order to have Y.
       >
       > Rodney, please point out where the logic fails in this
       statement.
       >
       > Sure, you can argue against my premises. You can’t reasonably
       argue against the logic.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I've already pointed it out.
       X doesn't need to make a decision on Z until T, but accepts Z at
       T minus lots. Suggesting that Z wasn't really what X wanted, and
       Y was more important.
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 20
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page