URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 117793--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Women: A New World Record!
   DIR By: honkytonk
       Date: January 3, 2024, 7:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: poorfour link ---
       >
       > I agree with the analysis but not necessarily the reasons. The
       creation of PWR has given teams that previously weren't
       competitive the budget to attract stars, and Quins lost more
       good players than they gained
       >
       > There is a plan to rebuild, and Quins have a decent Centre of
       Excellence to develop new talent, but it is taking longer than I
       had expected. I am not sure if that's down to the coaching or
       not, but Amy Turner does not look a happy bunny at the moment
       and imagine she will be under serious pressure if things don't
       improve.
       >
       > Sadly, it looks like we might have picked up some bad injuries
       on Saturday, including losing a second fly half after Mackenzie
       went back to Oz. Looks like a tough second half of the season
       ahead.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Yeah, injuries do seem to stack up.
       Re the Centre of Excellence, didnt they recently beat Exeter
       75-0??  We do seem to have some good youngsters, Shalliker looks
       rapid on the wing and Heyret has impressed when given a chance.
       My frustration comes from how poor we are. We havent been
       unlucky, we have been completely outplayed. Our basics skills
       are lacking. There are some good teams around now but our
       performances just not good enough.  Rugby basics seem to have
       deserted us.  Turner and the coaches have a huge job.
       The top 3 are miles ahead of the rest. If we can get our act
       together its still between us and Bristol for 4th spot imho.
       #Post#: 117809--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Women: A New World Record!
   DIR By: Mayor West
       Date: January 3, 2024, 12:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Now that all the Womens Prem teams are closely associated with
       Prem clubs the resources are more evenly spread. Clubs like
       Richmond (who lost all of their major talent to Quins) , DMP and
       Waterloo could never compete with Quins and Saracens who put the
       effort and finances into the Women’s game. Thus those two teams
       dominated the first three seasons of the Women’s Premiership
       competition. The rise of womens rugby has made other top clubs
       who can afford the costs of running a female squad realise that
       you need to attract the top talent to make it worthwhile. This
       has led to a much more even league because the best players are
       spread around a lot more. There is a salary cap but I’ve heard
       that it’s only “advisable” so looking at the squads you might
       get an idea who might be keeping to it or not.
       While it might not be good for us and we are struggling
       this year, the bigger picture is far better overall. Nobody
       wants to see uncompetitive one sided games and I’m far more
       likely to bother with watching a game that doesn’t involve Quins
       than I have been before.
       #Post#: 117812--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Women: A New World Record!
   DIR By: RodneyRegis
       Date: January 3, 2024, 1:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Fearless Fred link ---
       >
       > As much as some here seem to want to pour doubt and scorn on
       this, it's not just the club announcing something. This will
       have been verified by a Guinness World Record invigilator. They
       don't just take someone's word for a record. They have strict
       rules about what is & isn't allowed, how an attempt is measured,
       etc.
       >
       > As regards the technical side of it, it's fairly simple. Think
       back to the 2012 Premiership final. Even 11 years ago they had
       the technology to take a photo that showed the entire crowd. I
       remember it being posted online with the ability to pan around,
       zoom in, and even tag myself when I found where I'd been sitting
       that day (Block M10, Row 55, Seat 258). That was 11 years ago &
       didn't involve lots of mucking around. Now, fast forward to
       today, with the advances in computing, and it would be very
       simple to take a similar photosphere and get an accurate count
       of the people present (even programming to not count coaching
       staff, players, stewards etc as they can be easily defined).
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Guinness WR is as exposed to ESG as any other business. "Strict
       rules" lol. If they were strict they would never allow this,
       it's a mockery. Imagine if some club game between 2 womens'
       sides in NZ actually attracted 10k fans on its own merits.
       Actual paying fans.
       #Post#: 117813--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Women: A New World Record!
   DIR By: RodneyRegis
       Date: January 3, 2024, 1:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Quanks link ---
       >
       > At Twickenham for every England game you've got thousands who
       wouldn't have been there if it wasn't for a corporate jolly, do
       they count in attendances?
       >
       > Do we also need to ask all the attendees for the men's game if
       they primarily booked for the women's game and subtract them
       from the men's attendance?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       No, just count them both at individual games.
       The corporate jolly is there because of the men's game, not the
       other way round.
       I'm sure you're stubborn enough to suggest that as many would go
       to the same corporate jolly if the red roses were playing.
       #Post#: 117818--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Women: A New World Record!
   DIR By: DOK
       Date: January 3, 2024, 2:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is like arguing "but for that forward pass (that the ref
       didn't see/give) we would have won". The answer is whatever the
       reason, this was another record and ought to be celebrated as
       such. The requirement is "is there a bum on that seat?", it
       doesn't care if the reason is "we love women's rugby" or "we
       drove up from Exeter and allowed a good deal of time in case of
       traffic problems". If Saracens win because they played better or
       they're a cheating bunch of bar stewards, the history books show
       they have X amount of championships awarded to them - however
       much we'd like to see Exeter claim the win. It's a figure. It's
       a fact. Get over it.
       #Post#: 117825--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Women: A New World Record!
   DIR By: RodneyRegis
       Date: January 3, 2024, 4:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It will get plenty of likes, but that's a totally redundant
       analogy.
       #Post#: 117830--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Women: A New World Record!
   DIR By: Quanks
       Date: January 4, 2024, 3:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: RodneyRegis link ---
       >
       > No, just count them both at individual games.
       >
       > The corporate jolly is there because of the men's game, not
       the other way round.
       >
       > I'm sure you're stubborn enough to suggest that as many would
       go to the same corporate jolly if the red roses were playing.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Not at all, of course there's bigger corporate jollies for the
       men's game. I just don't think that people's intention for
       attending should change the count of whether they attended or
       not.
       #Post#: 117831--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Women: A New World Record!
   DIR By: Domestos
       Date: January 4, 2024, 3:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: DOK link ---
       >
       > This is like arguing "but for that forward pass (that the ref
       didn't see/give) we would have won". The answer is whatever the
       reason, this was another record and ought to be celebrated as
       such. The requirement is "is there a bum on that seat?", it
       doesn't care if the reason is "we love women's rugby" or "we
       drove up from Exeter and allowed a good deal of time in case of
       traffic problems". If Saracens win because they played better or
       they're a cheating bunch of bar stewards, the history books show
       they have X amount of championships awarded to them - however
       much we'd like to see Exeter claim the win. It's a figure. It's
       a fact. Get over it.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I don't agree.
       May I suggest that you have a blinkered view?
       #Post#: 117841--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Women: A New World Record!
   DIR By: deadlyfrom5yardsout
       Date: January 4, 2024, 4:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Quinky link ---
       >
       > Halfway stage, three points off the leaders... A couple of
       other teams have one more win than us.
       >
       > Yep, utterly appalling on the pitch... [emoji15]
       >
       >
       > I see you have found your local branch of Aldi....
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       *****************************************************
       Page 4 of 4
   DIR Previous Page