URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 108187--------------------------------------------------
       Silence from Clubs and Premiership Rugby 
   DIR By: Monte
       Date: April 25, 2023, 6:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have been following Quins since the dark ages and Prem Rugby
       since the start. We have about 100 Premiership Rugby players
       about to become unemployed as the clubs go down to £5 million
       budget each and we still have total silence! Quite
       extraordinary! Over 100 redundant what are they going to do wait
       for the whistle? How many are English qualified?
       I have paid my dues for 23/24 to Quins and I have no idea as of
       today how many Clubs there are going to be!  10 or 11? I think I
       must be a complete mug to accept being treated like this.
       Nothing from Quins or PR how long do they think we will accept
       this? At least give us the outline of what you are trying to
       achieve.
       #Post#: 108190--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Silence from Clubs and Premiership Rugby 
   DIR By: Audi Quintro
       Date: April 25, 2023, 6:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       More Brexit madness
       #Post#: 108194--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Silence from Clubs and Premiership Rugby 
   DIR By: poorfour
       Date: April 25, 2023, 7:10 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What do you want the clubs to do about it? They've got a salary
       cap - which was agreed 3 years ago - and most clubs will have
       been planning towards that.
       The collapse of Wasps and Worcester has thrown a bit of a
       spanner into the works because it means that there are suddenly
       a much larger pool of players from academy to international who
       were potentially available - but there was no increase in the
       salary cap to accommodate that.
       If you look at what's happened with Quins, three relatively
       expensive players have left for overseas deals, a few older
       players have retired and some squad players have been released.
       I think overall we're something like 12 out, 3 in and 8
       promotees from the academy, so broadly in line with the expected
       exodus. But it's also a fairly typical level of turnover for
       Quins.
       Other clubs - like Exeter - have made some more sweeping changes
       in terms of high profile players going. I suspect Quins have
       handled this better than most as they re-signed several key
       players early in COVID, I suspect on deals that allowed them to
       stay within the cap while offering more later.
       I would also hope that behind the scenes clubs have been working
       with players who likely weren't going to be renewed to help them
       explore other options. Life as a rugby player is short and it's
       going to end for everyone sooner or later (except Danny Care),
       so clubs are doing more to help with the transition. The
       Guardian has a good article about it today:
  HTML https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/apr/25/life-after-rugby-union-premiership-players-face-demanding-transition
       But what would you have the club do? Say it's sorry? Spend over
       the cap? Argue publicly for an increase in the cap? Offer
       players pay decreases so that we can hoover up Wasps and
       Worcester leavers? Raise prices so that they can make a case for
       a higher cap after next season?
       #Post#: 108195--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Silence from Clubs and Premiership Rugby 
   DIR By: Banstead Quin
       Date: April 25, 2023, 7:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I wonder, focusing on the 100, whether the powers that be would,
       in effect, run a bench scheme so that clubs who lose players to
       WC and long term injuries early in the season, get to pick
       replacements from within the 100 first, before looking
       elsewhere? These could then be outside of the cap bit helping to
       keep them paid until things improve....just a thought
       #Post#: 108196--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Silence from Clubs and Premiership Rugby 
   DIR By: never sleep
       Date: April 25, 2023, 8:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I suspect that it is now far fewer than 100.
       I think that typically, teams have 40-45 players.
       I would guess that there is around a 15% churn at the end of
       each season.
       So this takes it down to around 70ish.
       Then, some of the better players have already been snapped up by
       other clubs.
       So, the number is probably much less than 70.
       Also, Wasps will need players when they re-join the Championship
       - This is of course assuming that they re-join as a professional
       club. But, we will have no news about this for the next few
       months.
       So, I don't think that there will be that many spare players.
       #Post#: 108197--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Silence from Clubs and Premiership Rugby 
   DIR By: Monte
       Date: April 25, 2023, 10:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The figure of 100 came from Robert Kitson in the Guardian this
       morning. This is not particularly a hit out at Quins it is
       across the board at Rugby Union in England  and Premier Rugby in
       particular. I feel desperately sorry for the players involved
       trying to organise their lives around this chaos and total lack
       of information being provided. It’s like a game of Chinese
       whispers but appears to be only me that feels this.
       #Post#: 108198--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Silence from Clubs and Premiership Rugby 
   DIR By: poorfour
       Date: April 25, 2023, 10:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Monte link ---
       >
       > The figure of 100 came from Robert Kitson in the Guardian this
       morning. This is not particularly a hit out at Quins it is
       across the board at Rugby Union in England  and Premier Rugby in
       particular. I feel desperately sorry for the players involved
       trying to organise their lives around this chaos and total lack
       of information being provided. It’s like a game of Chinese
       whispers but appears to be only me that feels this.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I think all of us (except perhaps those who see players as
       commodities to be fired if they have a couple of bad games) have
       sympathy for the players, but just because we don't know much
       about the situation, it doesn't mean the players don't know
       more.
       Some of them will have some tough decisions about taking a
       contract that's less than they'd planned for, and some will have
       an even tougher decision about retiring from playing. But that
       could happen to any professional sportsperson at any time - it
       just happens to have happened to a larger slice of the Prem
       playing base than usual. Clubs have been getting better at
       helping players to prepare for "what happens next", so I'd
       expect most of them to have options to go alongside their broken
       dreams.
       To BansteadQuin's idea of only picking from that pool of
       players, how would that work in practice? There's no guarantee
       that any given player will be needed, and how do they pay the
       bills while they're waiting to see whether a contract will
       emerge? Where does that money come from?
       #Post#: 108202--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Silence from Clubs and Premiership Rugby 
   DIR By: Fursty
       Date: April 25, 2023, 11:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hopefully someone will post a list soon (they normally do at
       about this time of year) - but it would be very interesting to
       see what the ins and outs look like across the league. I'd be
       particularly interested to see Bath's, I'd love to know how
       they're keeping at the new Wuss signings under the cap before
       you even think about the addition of Finn Russell.
       #Post#: 108203--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Silence from Clubs and Premiership Rugby 
   DIR By: Quinky
       Date: April 25, 2023, 11:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Banstead Quin link ---
       >
       > I wonder, focusing on the 100, whether the powers that be
       would, in effect, run a bench scheme so that clubs who lose
       players to WC and long term injuries early in the season, get to
       pick replacements from within the 100 first, before looking
       elsewhere? These could then be outside of the cap bit helping to
       keep them paid until things improve....just a thought
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I would expect that most, if not all, will have secured
       alternative employment by the time RWC comes around.
       #Post#: 108204--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Silence from Clubs and Premiership Rugby 
   DIR By: Brown Bottle
       Date: April 25, 2023, 11:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: poorfour link ---
       >
       > ...
       > I suspect Quins have handled this better than most as they
       re-signed several key players early in COVID, I suspect on deals
       that allowed them to stay within the cap while offering more
       later.
       > ...
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Well, let's hope not since that would appear to be against the
       salary cap rules.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 4
   DIR Next Page