URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 98871--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eng v Arg
   DIR By: Mayor West
       Date: November 8, 2022, 3:45 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It looks to me that statistics don’t really count for much but
       points on the scoreboard do. You can have 90% territory and
       possession but if you don’t score points and the oppo scores 7
       from their 10% you lose.
       #Post#: 98873--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eng v Arg
   DIR By: Domestos
       Date: November 8, 2022, 4:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Account_109 link ---
       >
       > England made 9 offloads to Argentina's 1. I really wish that
       people would actually look at the stats before making easily
       disprovable claims. From actually looking at the stats, we see
       that basically the only thing England were worse than Argentina
       at was turnovers lost (13 to Arg's 8), which to me suggests that
       England are still settling into their patterns, and that it
       won't take much for results to change
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Another, quite fundamental thing that England were worse at than
       Argentina was scoring points.
       #Post#: 98874--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eng v Arg
   DIR By: T-Bone
       Date: November 8, 2022, 5:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Few people in Twitter have highlighted the shocking lack of
       effort from Farrell and Nowell to chase back after the
       intercept. That sort of lack of effort by players who aren't his
       favourites would see them dropped permanently. It just goes to
       show that not all players have to earn their place
       #Post#: 98875--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eng v Arg
   DIR By: Account_109
       Date: November 8, 2022, 5:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Mayor West link ---
       >
       > It looks to me that statistics don’t really count for much but
       points on the scoreboard do. You can have 90% territory and
       possession but if you don’t score points and the oppo scores 7
       from their 10% you lose.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Sure, points on the board are more important than stats,
       obviously, but stats give you insight into why points
       were/weren't being scored. In this case, the key stat that
       explains why England struggled to convert possession and
       territory into points is that they lost the ball more often than
       Argentina did
       #Post#: 98877--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eng v Arg
   DIR By: JammyGit
       Date: November 9, 2022, 2:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Account_109 link ---
       >
       > I would strongly disagree with that definition of an effective
       offload. There are plenty of reasons to offload that aren't just
       to put someone through a gap - primarily to change the point of
       contact, allowing you to make a dominant carry and get front
       foot ball. You also mention offloads off the floor, which are
       popular at the moment as another tool in the arms race for
       faster ruck speed. Would you say that an offload isn't effective
       if it directly leads to a clean break being made on the next
       phase, rather than putting someone through a gap immediately?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I'd say offloads that happen long after contact aren't as
       effective as offloads that happen through contact.
       Otherwise they're just another pass that makes a ruck slightly
       quicker. It's about how much space the receiver has and how
       little time to react the defenders have.
       Billy going into contact, being wrestled for a few seconds, then
       offloading backwards to his 9 is better than losing the ball but
       not a particularly effective offload.
       I also don't quite get what you mean about changing the point of
       contact. Contact has already happened. That's why it's an
       offload and not a pass.
       #Post#: 98882--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eng v Arg
   DIR By: JammyGit
       Date: November 9, 2022, 4:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: T-Bone link ---
       >
       > Few people in Twitter have highlighted the shocking lack of
       effort from Farrell and Nowell to chase back after the
       intercept. That sort of lack of effort by players who aren't his
       favourites would see them dropped permanently. It just goes to
       show that not all players have to earn their place
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I have to say I thought it was pretty obviously a knock-on so I
       can't really blame them. And the guy who picked it up is way
       faster than both of those players, who are in the side more for
       their deep thinking than their ability to run fast... ;-)
       #Post#: 98884--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eng v Arg
   DIR By: MaidstoneQuin
       Date: November 9, 2022, 4:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I hope the backs wind in the constant running over and slapping
       the backs of the forwards for doing something fairly straight
       forward. I understand supporting team mates when on top, but it
       felt OTT in my view.
       I might start running over to my colleagues at work patting them
       on the back for logging on and responding to an email
       #Post#: 98885--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eng v Arg
   DIR By: Camquin
       Date: November 9, 2022, 5:05 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It is a knock on, if and only if, the referee blows their
       whistle.
       Until then, keep playing.
       #Post#: 98888--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eng v Arg
   DIR By: Brown Bottle
       Date: November 9, 2022, 5:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: MaidstoneQuin link ---
       >
       > I hope the backs wind in the constant running over and
       slapping the backs of the forwards for doing something fairly
       straight forward. I understand supporting team mates when on
       top, but it felt OTT in my view.
       >
       > I might start running over to my colleagues at work patting
       them on the back for logging on and responding to an email
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Unfortunately every team does that now.
       #Post#: 98889--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eng v Arg
   DIR By: Yareet
       Date: November 9, 2022, 5:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Brown Bottle link ---
       >
       > Unfortunately every team does that now.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Even at the Ams’ lowly level.
       And to some extent I can understand it. I don’t think many would
       bemoan players celebrating a try. Likewise a try-saving tackle
       or turnover.
       So why not a big scrum drive or penalty won?
       Put another way, what should be celebrated by players and what
       shouldn’t?
       *****************************************************
       Page 7 of 10
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page