URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ComeAllWithin (Harlequins Rugby)
  HTML https://comeallwithin.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: ComeAllWithin Board
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 95411--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Team's Up!
   DIR By: poorfour
       Date: September 12, 2022, 4:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Quinston Churchill link ---
       >
       > I think this is a pretty good comparison. I’d say Wade was a
       better attacker, but he also played in better teams than Radwan
       which probably skews it a bit. Radwan is a better defender than
       Wade, but OK rather than notably good.
       >
       > As well as defence/positioning, the other piece is the aerial
       side. Radwan is just OK when it comes to dealing with high balls
       or chasing kicks. When you’ve got someone like Tommy Freeman who
       scores more tries and is significantly better at the things
       Radwan isn’t great at, it’s pretty obvious why he’s not higher
       up the pecking order.
       >
       > I didn’t think his try was anything that special either?
       No-one’s talking about Earle’s but they weren’t drastically
       different IMO.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       The big question is whether Radwan can learn to get better at
       the things he's bad at. I think he has improved and looks
       willing to learn, albeit he had a long way to go. Wade by
       comparison kept falling back on his speed to compensate for his
       positional wekanesses, and at international level that was a
       career ender.
       #Post#: 95412--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Team's Up!
   DIR By: never sleep
       Date: September 12, 2022, 4:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I watched the game yesterday after knowing what the result was.
       Some of the comments (clueless/shambles/etc) in this thread seem
       bizarre.
       Newcastle scored 2 tries against the run of play (Radwan and
       Earle). I was surprised that Earle's try stood. It looked as
       though the lazy runner disrupted our attack and led to the
       intercept.
       I thought that generally, our scrum looked good.
       But, there was clearly a little communications failure between
       the SH and hooker. I think that we didn't manage to hook a
       couple of balls. One looked as though it was caused by out SH
       getting his timing wrong. But, this is to be expected when both
       are new/inexperienced.
       The stats look very good for Quins. So we were clearly doing
       plenty of things right.
       I was surprised that the ref didn't give Newcastle a warning
       earlier in the game. They were giving away loads of penalties in
       the red zone. In some cases, there were multiple different
       infringements that happened almost simultaneously. (However,
       these usually only count as 1 penalty in the stats.)
       As en example, I think that we were doing a catch and drive.
       Newcastle lifted a leg of one of our players. At a similar time,
       another player went way offside to prevent us using the ball
       from the maul - but - it only counts as one penalty.
       I wasn't surprised that Newcastle scored a few from close range.
       I think that is what they are good at.
       I did like our S/H's kicking game. It seemed as though all of
       his kicks were contestable.
       Overall, good game to watch and a good win at a location that is
       not always the easiest to win at.
       #Post#: 95414--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Team's Up!
   DIR By: Andrew Moore
       Date: September 12, 2022, 5:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It was similar to how many of last season's games went.  5
       points away from home on the first day of the season is really
       all you can reasonably ask for.
       That being said, the concerns in defence remain - it seems
       sometimes that the only way we get the ball back is by conceding
       a try so we can then get possession and go on to score one
       ourselves.  Maul defence is a weakness, but Newcastle are quite
       well drilled there and our 2, 4 & 5 won't be hugely familiar
       with each other yet.  Key will be to not give away pens near
       halfway and be defending close to our line from the resulting
       kick.  It probably seems like we're conceding more here because
       increasingly teams are turning down 3 points for a kick into the
       corner.
       Dombrandt looked great - proper captain's performance and I
       thought Head went really well, especially on his "darts".
       Lennox looks sharp and distribution was probably better than I
       was expecting.  He maybe didn't run as much himself as I'd
       thought he would do - and generally we didn't look very direct
       but should improve as players become more used to each other
       (Allan and Lennox have surely not played many/any games together
       - certainly not with Gjaltema at 9).  Comparing to Andre in this
       department would be unfair to pretty much every centre in the
       world barring a small handful and in any case we should be
       capable of (and did) generating linebreaks with a good running
       inside centre even if they are a few inches and stone smaller.
       Looking ahead to Saracens, given their PRC game was called off
       and that they looked to be using it as a pre-season game,
       perhaps they'll be a bit slower out the blocks.  If we can build
       a good early lead then their usual gameplan may have to go out
       the window.
       #Post#: 95420--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Team's Up!
   DIR By: Quinston Churchill
       Date: September 12, 2022, 6:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I’m a little bit confused re. the comments on our defence TBH. I
       think we need to be more specific.
       Re. the maul defence, there’s no shying away from the fact that
       we’re not good at this and as As @Maggiephilquin said, we’ll
       definitely miss Symons in this department. That being said, it
       is probably Newcastle’s strongest suit (McGuigan’s try rate says
       so too) which probably made it look more of a problem than it
       might be against other sides who places less emphasis on this.
       From an open play POV, I genuinely don’t recall us obviously
       struggling at any point TBH? The tries for Radwan and Earle
       weren’t defensive issues, they came from our attacking mistakes.
       Our defenders were out of position because they were (rightly)
       expecting to be involved in the next phase of attack - the
       errors were the players clearing out Green or giving a pass that
       should have been held (lazy runner definitely disrupted us too),
       not the defence.
       #Post#: 95422--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Team's Up!
   DIR By: Andrew Moore
       Date: September 12, 2022, 8:10 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Quinston Churchill link ---
       >
       > I’m a little bit confused re. the comments on our defence TBH.
       I think we need to be more specific.
       >
       > Re. the maul defence, there’s no shying away from the fact
       that we’re not good at this and as As @Maggiephilquin said,
       we’ll definitely miss Symons in this department. That being
       said, it is probably Newcastle’s strongest suit (McGuigan’s try
       rate says so too) which probably made it look more of a problem
       than it might be against other sides who places less emphasis on
       this.
       >
       > From an open play POV, I genuinely don’t recall us obviously
       struggling at any point TBH? The tries for Radwan and Earle
       weren’t defensive issues, they came from our attacking mistakes.
       Our defenders were out of position because they were (rightly)
       expecting to be involved in the next phase of attack - the
       errors were the players clearing out Green or giving a pass that
       should have been held (lazy runner definitely disrupted us too),
       not the defence.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Those are fair points - and I've gone back and checked the stats
       and there is nothing there to suggest we had defensive issues
       outside of the maul and a couple of turnover tries.  I'm
       probably reflecting some early season over-eagerness to see a
       dominating defensive display and letting a nine-point margin
       sway the underlying reality in that we didn't allow them to play
       too much.  We did concede 14 turnovers, but with nearly 60%
       possession and a very low kicking from hand % then that's maybe
       not surprising (plus I'm sure we will sharpen up).
       One mention on the scrums as well - I think some credit may have
       to go to Trevor Davison, who is a pretty tidy operator.  Plus
       I'm sure the pitch there isn't an ideal surface.
       #Post#: 95423--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Team's Up!
   DIR By: never sleep
       Date: September 12, 2022, 8:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: MerstQuin link ---
       >
       > Those are fair points - and I've gone back and checked the
       stats and there is nothing there to suggest we had defensive
       issues outside of the maul and a couple of turnover tries.  I'm
       probably reflecting some early season over-eagerness to see a
       dominating defensive display and letting a nine-point margin
       sway the underlying reality in that we didn't allow them to play
       too much.  We did concede 14 turnovers, but with nearly 60%
       possession and a very low kicking from hand % then that's maybe
       not surprising (plus I'm sure we will sharpen up).
       >
       > One mention on the scrums as well - I think some credit may
       have to go to Trevor Davison, who is a pretty tidy operator.
       Plus I'm sure the pitch there isn't an ideal surface.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I am sure that there are multiple sources of stats
       But - this post
  HTML https://tinyurl.com/z86v2c5s
       shows:
       61% possession; 63% territory and 13 Turnovers won against 10
       conceded.
       It also shows the huge difference in penalty count
       #Post#: 95424--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Team's Up!
   DIR By: T-Bone
       Date: September 12, 2022, 8:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       On the scrum, you could hear Pearce warning Gjaltema and
       speaking to our front row and basically saying that our delayed
       put-ins / timing issues were the reason for the scrum problems.
       I think that's what he was saying anyway.
       I was surprised at the time that Earle's try wasn't pulled back,
       and still think it was iffy having watched the highlights. The
       problem is though that Pearce loudly said "oh come on, just get
       on with it", or words to that effect, when we complained about
       their lazy runner, so he then couldn't really go back and look
       at it. If he'd said nothing during our attacking phase then he
       could have asked the TMO to have a look. He might still have
       come to the same conclusion, but having so clearly waved played
       on at the time he didn't really allow himself the option of
       looking again. Maybe I'm over-analysing though.
       Murley would have been disappointed to spill a fairly routine
       cross kick / kick pass for a try, but certainly made up for it
       at the end to stop Radwan.
       #Post#: 95429--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Team's Up!
   DIR By: never sleep
       Date: September 12, 2022, 9:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: MaidstoneQuin link ---
       >
       > We are making some awful decisions. Really stupid penalty from
       Joe, who’s been poor so far.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I was looking at the stats earlier. Neither of the Joes conceded
       any penalties.
       Are you sure you were watching the correct game?
       (Actually, maybe you were correct. The following all conceded 1
       penalty apiece.
       Joe Murley, Joe Louw, Joe Hammond, Joe Kenningham, Joe Lawday,
       Joe Dombrandt, Joe Musk and Joe Kerrod)
       #Post#: 95430--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Team's Up!
   DIR By: You Shall Not Pass
       Date: September 12, 2022, 10:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: never sleep link ---
       >
       > I was looking at the stats earlier. Neither of the Joes
       conceded any penalties.
       > Are you sure you were watching the correct game?
       >
       >
       > (Actually, maybe you were correct. The following all conceded
       1 penalty apiece.
       > Joe Murley, Joe Louw, Joe Hammond, Joe Kenningham, Joe Lawday,
       Joe Dombrandt, Joe Musk and Joe Kerrod)
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Maybe he was talking about Joe Pearce, who was stupid for
       awarding it
       #Post#: 95431--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Team's Up!
   DIR By: TomBuckQuin
       Date: September 12, 2022, 11:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       He is Joe King and I claim my £5.
       *****************************************************
       Page 11 of 12
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page